Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Glenn Wolsey

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Nov 24, 2005
1,230
2
New Zealand
That's right, if you couldn't tell from the title I've finally taken the plunge on a DSLR. What did I chose? The Canon EOS 350D.

So far I've taken around 100 test shots, the DSLR gives me immensive control over what I'm shooting. I've already done some comparisons to my Sony P&S and it wasn't even worth my time, the 350D blew the Sony away in image quality.

Current kit: Canon EOS 350D Body, 18-55 Kit Lens.
Coming Soon: 2GB CF Card, 50mm 1.8 Lens, 75-300 Lens.

Keep an eye on my Flickr account for photos!
 

Mike Teezie

macrumors 68020
Nov 20, 2002
2,205
1
Congrats on the new camera, you'll love it.

If I may - I'd advise against the 75-300, and in its place recommend the 70-200 f/4L. It's not much more money, and it is a much, much, much better lens.
 

sjl

macrumors 6502
Sep 15, 2004
441
0
Melbourne, Australia
If I may - I'd advise against the 75-300, and in its place recommend the 70-200 f/4L. It's not much more money, and it is a much, much, much better lens.

Strongly seconded. Hell, I can't go overboard in saying how much I agree with this comment.

I took maybe a dozen shots with my 75-300 on my 20D, looked at them, and sold the lens on eBay. You'll get better results from cropping the 70-200.
 

Caitlyn

macrumors 6502a
Jun 30, 2005
842
0
Congrats. :) Looking forward to seeing some "applicious" photos, in Nathan's lingo. ;)
 

iGary

Guest
May 26, 2004
19,580
7
Randy's House
That's right, if you couldn't tell from the title I've finally taken the plunge on a DSLR. What did I chose? The Canon EOS 350D.

So far I've taken around 100 test shots, the DSLR gives me immensive control over what I'm shooting. I've already done some comparisons to my Sony P&S and it wasn't even worth my time, the 350D blew the Sony away in image quality.

Current kit: Canon EOS 350D Body, 18-55 Kit Lens.
Coming Soon: 2GB CF Card, 50mm 1.8 Lens, 75-300 Lens.

Keep an eye on my Flickr account for photos!

Congrats Glenn.

Glad you got the 50mm 1.8 straight off; you'll love it.
 

extraextra

macrumors 68000
Jun 29, 2006
1,758
0
California
Congrats!

I'm with the others - skip the 75-300. If you need that range on a budget, the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro will do a pretty good job for about $200. Otherwise, save up and get the 70-200 f/4L (non-IS), it's amazing.
 

Earendil

macrumors 68000
Oct 27, 2003
1,582
36
Washington
Congrats!

I'm with the others - skip the 75-300. If you need that range on a budget, the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro will do a pretty good job for about $200. Otherwise, save up and get the 70-200 f/4L (non-IS), it's amazing.

I'll chime in as well, the 70-200f/4.0 is an amazing lens. More so than image quality for me is its ability to focus extremely fast. One of the reasons I got a DSLR was to get rid of shutter lag... why not buy a lens that doesn't spend forever* trying to focus on the subject?

~Tyler


*Forever is a relative term. I do a lot of action/sports photography, and a slower focus would drive me insane.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.