Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Original poster
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10308013-75.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20

A judge on Tuesday ordered Microsoft to stop selling Word, one of its premier products, in its current form due to patent infringement.
Judge Leonard Davis of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a permanent injunction that "prohibits Microsoft from selling or importing to the United States any Microsoft Word products that have the capability of opening .XML, .DOCX or DOCM files (XML files) containing custom XML," according to a statement released by attorneys for the plantiff, i4i.

Microsoft did not immediately reply to request for comment but said in a statement that it planned to appeal the verdict.

Toronto-based i4i sued Microsoft in March 2007 alleging that the Redmond,Wash.-based software giant violated its 1998 patent (No. 5,787,449) for a document system that eliminated the need for manually embedded formatting codes.

XML--an integral feature in Microsoft Word--is considered a "page description language," with one of its key qualities being that it is readable by people, not just machines. Unlike HTML, which has predefined tags, XML allows developers and users to define their own tags for data, such as price and product.

In May, a federal jury in Tyler, Texas, ruled that the custom XML tagging features of Word 2003 and Word 2007 infringed on i4i's patent and ordered Microsoft to pay $200 million in the case.
In Tuesday's ruling, Microsoft was also ordered to pay an additional $40 million for willful infringement, as well as $37 million in prejudgment interest. The order requires Microsoft to comply with the injunction within 60 days and forbids Microsoft from testing, demonstrating, or marketing Word products containing the contested XML feature.


Interesting . . .
 

dejo

Moderator emeritus
Sep 2, 2004
15,982
452
The Centennial State
In May, a federal jury in Tyler, Texas, ruled that the custom XML tagging features of Word 2003 and Word 2007 infringed on i4i's patent and ordered Microsoft to pay $200 million in the case. In Tuesday's ruling, Microsoft was also ordered to pay an additional $40 million for willful infringement...
Sounds like Microsoft has decided not to pay anyone off yet.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Original poster
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
There is an injunction in place currently. MS has 60 days to comply with it. So we'll see what MS does within that timeframe.
 

Scooterman1

macrumors 6502a
May 15, 2008
939
12
Houston, Tx
That's O.K. I have MS Office, but I use OpenOffice, which is FREE, most of the time anyway. I like the interface better than the Ribbon.
 

Eraserhead

macrumors G4
Nov 3, 2005
10,434
12,250
UK
I think this will be overturned. If this actually happened the US would be utterly humiliated.
 

GoCubsGo

macrumors Nehalem
Feb 19, 2005
35,742
155
I think this will be overturned. If this actually happened the US would be utterly humiliated.

I love it when something happens in the US that may or may not be stupid and someone comes out of the woodwork to note how the entire US will be utterly humiliated. The generalizations that occur when stupid news comes from the US are awesome. :rolleyes:

I for one, live in the US and will not feel an ounce of humiliation over this nor would I if it actually sticks. It will not because let's face it, it's stupid.

I only wish this would get those iditos to stop letting newer versions of Office default save using DOCX. It's driving me insane at work.

the ruling wold take 60 days until effective, and will be overturned by then. Just surprising that MSFT didn't settle the case out of court.

It is possible they tried and were unable to, no one knows because the news reports what it wants us to know.
 

GoCubsGo

macrumors Nehalem
Feb 19, 2005
35,742
155
Exactly. The out of court settlement was likely much higher. MS probably figured it'd be cheaper to go the judicial route.
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Jul 11, 2003
27,397
12,521
I love it when something happens in the US that may or may not be stupid and someone comes out of the woodwork to note how the entire US will be utterly humiliated. The generalizations that occur when stupid news comes from the US are awesome. :rolleyes:



Yeah, kind of tired of all the America bashing. Lighten up on us, Bush is gone. :D
 

Eraserhead

macrumors G4
Nov 3, 2005
10,434
12,250
UK
I love it when something happens in the US that may or may not be stupid and someone comes out of the woodwork to note how the entire US will be utterly humiliated. The generalizations that occur when stupid news comes from the US are awesome. :rolleyes:

I think Britain would be humiliated if we banned Microsoft Word from sale as well - practically regardless of the reason it was done. Let alone if it was banned from sale because of a patent troll.
 

GoCubsGo

macrumors Nehalem
Feb 19, 2005
35,742
155
No, America would not be humiliated if you're speaking for every single American. Just as Britain should not feel at all humiliated if your judicial system is behind stupid decisions. I don't consider humiliation of all of America to be eminent as a result of this patent dispute.
 

bartelby

macrumors Core
Jun 16, 2004
19,795
34
I think Britain would be humiliated if we banned Microsoft Word from sale as well - practically regardless of the reason it was done. Let alone if it was banned from sale because of a patent troll.

Really?

I think we'd not give a toss to be honest.
 

whooleytoo

macrumors 604
Aug 2, 2002
6,607
716
Cork, Ireland.
Anyone know what exactly the patent is? I'm assuming it's something a tad more cleverer than "Let's use XML for our document file format. Cha-ching!!"
 

Darth.Titan

macrumors 68030
Oct 31, 2007
2,906
753
Austin, TX
Sure, read the article.
a patent that describes how programs go about "manipulating a document's content and architecture separately."
So maybe the company's next move will be to sue the W3C for the XHTML / CSS standards... :rolleyes:
 

exegete77

macrumors 6502a
Feb 12, 2008
529
6
It isn't XML format that is the problem. Rather "Custom XML format put in by MS" that is the problem. Remember that MS developed the .docx format soon after they were forced to make .doc specifications public. They tried the end run and at least for now are caught.

And it would be unusual for an appeal court to rule within two months.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.