I would like a legitimate discussion here. None of that "Macs are better" without any support BS.
First off, let me say I am mainly a PC user. Although, I also am a frequent *nix user. I have also owned two Apple computers, and I currently own a custom built Hackintosh. I have had experience with a number of OSes and hardware to form a valid opinion.
I honestly feel that one OS is not better than the other. The constant argument is that Macs are overpriced. Sure they're priced higher than the lower end PCs with possibly better specs, but there is a reason. You're paying for the premium that things should automatically work out of the box without any hassle. Apple controls it's whole ecosystem, making a very good end-user experience. With Windows on the other hand, this is a different case. Microsoft just develops the software. After that, it is out of their hands. Microsoft sells the software, then 3rd party companies will build the actual computer. With this, they have to provide their own drivers for the hardware that Microsoft doesn't natively include(and which they can't natively include because of the vast hardware that Windows is installed on.)
People claim that PCs constantly have errors for no reason, and that OS X computers have never had errors once before. This is the most ignorant argument presented in any debate. Lets look at it from a car point of view. Lets say you buy a Ford F-150, it's going to last you for a long time. The only way it will last you a long time though, is if you maintain it. PCs need to be maintained and taken care of or things will start to go downhill. People think that they can install 90 applications that all start on boot and run in the background and are constantly updating without repercussions. No. On the Apple side, lets say you pay the premium and buy a nice Mercedes CLS class. It will last you longer than the F-150 without needed maintenance, but then eventually it will start having issues because you didn't maintain it.
This is just more of a little rant. Lets have a nice discussion though
First off, let me say I am mainly a PC user. Although, I also am a frequent *nix user. I have also owned two Apple computers, and I currently own a custom built Hackintosh. I have had experience with a number of OSes and hardware to form a valid opinion.
I honestly feel that one OS is not better than the other. The constant argument is that Macs are overpriced. Sure they're priced higher than the lower end PCs with possibly better specs, but there is a reason. You're paying for the premium that things should automatically work out of the box without any hassle. Apple controls it's whole ecosystem, making a very good end-user experience. With Windows on the other hand, this is a different case. Microsoft just develops the software. After that, it is out of their hands. Microsoft sells the software, then 3rd party companies will build the actual computer. With this, they have to provide their own drivers for the hardware that Microsoft doesn't natively include(and which they can't natively include because of the vast hardware that Windows is installed on.)
People claim that PCs constantly have errors for no reason, and that OS X computers have never had errors once before. This is the most ignorant argument presented in any debate. Lets look at it from a car point of view. Lets say you buy a Ford F-150, it's going to last you for a long time. The only way it will last you a long time though, is if you maintain it. PCs need to be maintained and taken care of or things will start to go downhill. People think that they can install 90 applications that all start on boot and run in the background and are constantly updating without repercussions. No. On the Apple side, lets say you pay the premium and buy a nice Mercedes CLS class. It will last you longer than the F-150 without needed maintenance, but then eventually it will start having issues because you didn't maintain it.
This is just more of a little rant. Lets have a nice discussion though