I have a canon 20d and have the cheapo 18-55 kit lens which I never use. I also have the 50mm 1.4 which I love, but it a bit long on my 20d. Just picked up a 70-200 f4L which is amazing. Now that I have a taste for L series, I want a sharp indoor lens that I can use for shooting my baby, etc. Any suggestions? Any cheaper alternatives offered by tamron? I dont want anything that will be redundant to my 70-200. What would be the next logical lens for indoors?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
lens advice
- Thread starter smackay
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Here are some to research:
Tamron 17-50/2.8 ~$350
Sigma 17-50/2.8 EX Macro (the Macro one, not it's predecessor, which is inferior) ~$350
Canon 17-55/2.8 IS ~$1,000
Sigma 30/1.4 ~$350
Canon 35/2.0 ~$250
Also, do you have the 18-55 or the 18-55IS. If you're current 18-55 is NOT the IS version, you might find the IS version (which can be found as a refurb for $120) is a major step-up, and might do the trick for you.
Check out the reply here (talked about the regular Canon lenses):
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/670391/
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/670391/
I have just the regular 18-55. I have been looking at the Tamron 17-50 2.8. Have you seen any sample shots from this? Any positive or negative feedback on it?
Many people swear by the Tamron 2.8. I had both the Tamron 2.8 and the Sigma 2.8 to try for 2 weeks. I went with the Sigma, but it was pretty close. I liked the look of the Sigma better (a minor point) and I though the my Sigma copy was sharper than my Tamron copy, but lens sharpness can differ between copies of the same lens. They were close enough that, if I had to, I would re-evaluate the Tamron again. I would say they are both very close in quality and output.
btw -- I agree with toxic. Though I gave you a range of choices, I really like my 35/2. I hear the 30/1.4 is even better but a) it costs more, and b) Sigma sometimes have quality issues with their lenses that you have to work out (by either returning and getting another copy, or sending to Sigma under warranty). However, lots of folks who have worked through it to get a good copy of the 30/1.4, say it's a great lens.
I also just remembered another reason why I took the Sigma (yes, 18-50) over the Tammy. My Sigma copy was MUCH quiter than my Tammy, which was even louder than my 35/2, though I think the 35/2 is not so loud any way.
I also just remembered another reason why I took the Sigma (yes, 18-50) over the Tammy. My Sigma copy was MUCH quiter than my Tammy, which was even louder than my 35/2, though I think the 35/2 is not so loud any way.
The EF 50mm f/1.4 would be an excellent lens for taking photos of your family indoors, or low lighting. It costs under $400.00.
I have the Tamrom 18-50mm f/2.8, and love it. This one replaces the 18-55mm kit lens.
I have the Tamrom 18-50mm f/2.8, and love it. This one replaces the 18-55mm kit lens.
Then the OP may have to go with a wide lens around f/1.4. That would be quite expensive for a good one, I imagine.
The OP can look in here:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=141406
It's in your bag: 50/1.4
You already have a terrific baby-capture lens, the 50mm f/1.4. I use my 50 (the f/1.8) for lots of indoor and low-light stuff like this:
Of course, if you're frustrated with the kit lens, you should also replace it for general purpose shooting, especially if you like zooms (as I do). I replaced my kit with the Tamron 17-50/2.8, which I love. Other options depending on your budget would be Canon's 17-55/2.8IS or the IS version of the kit lens, 18-55/3.5-5.6IS. Both are considered good lenses.
You already have a terrific baby-capture lens, the 50mm f/1.4. I use my 50 (the f/1.8) for lots of indoor and low-light stuff like this:
Of course, if you're frustrated with the kit lens, you should also replace it for general purpose shooting, especially if you like zooms (as I do). I replaced my kit with the Tamron 17-50/2.8, which I love. Other options depending on your budget would be Canon's 17-55/2.8IS or the IS version of the kit lens, 18-55/3.5-5.6IS. Both are considered good lenses.
The most obvious choice would be the 35mm prime. It is almost as fast as the 50mm but wider. It's also relatively low cost.
You could go with a zoom. But you'd want an f/2.8 zoom and none of those are cheap. You already have a slow f/5.6 zoom, no need for another lens like that.