Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Lens filters for Nikon

J

JuiceyJuice

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 11, 2010
24
0
Philadelphia, PA
Ok, I have a Nikon D3000 with the kit lens 18-55mm, 55-200mm, and just recently got the 35mm 1.8 prime. I will also be getting a Tokina 12-24mm. I'm looking for some suggestions on what types and kinds of filters to look into for these lenses. Any suggestions welcomed.

Thanks!
 
A polarizer should be in everyone's kit, IMO.

You can save money by on filters by buying the largest filter size you'll need, and then buying inexpensive step-up rings for your lenses so you can use the polarizer with all of them. I standardized my filter set at 77mm, since that's the Nikon (and Canon) "pro" size - I figured it was unlikely I'd ever have a lens that needed any filter larger than that.

BTW given the low cost of the first two lenses you list, I don't see the point in a "protective" filter. For a good one you're going to spend 1/3 to 1/2 the replacement cost of the lens. If you buy a cheap one, then you're compromising image quality.

If you do end up buying protective filters, then obviously my "step up" ring idea doesn't apply in that case since you'd want to keep a filter on each lens.
 
I've had a simple 'skylight' filter on each lens I've ever own (I take better pix when I'm not worrying about getting equipment damaged). Other filters? Wait till there's something you want to do that's impossible with the gear you already have (no point filling your bag with stuff you don't really need). Less is more, IMO...
 
Westside guy said:
A polarizer should be in everyone's kit, IMO.

You can save money by on filters by buying the largest filter size you'll need, and then buying inexpensive step-up rings for your lenses so you can use the polarizer with all of them. I standardized my filter set at 77mm, since that's the Nikon (and Canon) "pro" size - I figured it was unlikely I'd ever have a lens that needed any filter larger than that.
Click to expand...
Or just buying a Lee/Cokin filter set ;)
 
UV filters are a waste, unless you are shooting in the desert (Sahara for example). The only filters that are worth anything, IMO, are grad, PL and ND. Everything else, you can do in photoshop.

I agree that graduated ND filters (or reverse, etc) should be the square style. I just ordered a 3 stop SE Galen Rowell filter.

I have never used a UV filter, and I have never had a scratched lens. They are more durable than you think. Just use some lens cleaner, a dedicated lens cloth (hand wash it) and a lens pen, as well as a giottos blower. I have been using these for years and years and years, and never have had a problem. I shoot in the rain and stuff quite a bit, as that is how it is up here.
 
Thanks for the advice guys, BUT I was actually looking for suggestions for Neutral Density filters, exactly what type to purchase for the camera/lenses I have. I wasn't really too worried about prtection yet with the relatively low cost of the lenses I currently own.

Suggestions?
 
My suggestion would be to buy 77mm ones and step up rings. Saves you buying NDs per lens. B&W do good ones and I have some of the Hoya Pro1 digital ones which are fine (I have an ND4 and ND8 which along with a circular polariser covers all eventualities for me)
 
Is there any difference between, say a plane ND filter and a "digital" ND filter? Or is the "digital" label that I've seen on some filters just a marketing scheme?
 
^

I wasn't aware they labeled them "digital" and non-digital, if that tells you anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back