Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

caliguy

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jun 12, 2005
336
1,046
I'm not a very active member of these forums, so sorry if this has been discussed.

I'm guessing that Leopard is delayed because of possible Blu-ray addition to the Mac lineup. Of course this probably isn't the whole entire reason, but I think that added probably a month or two to the delay.

Any thoughts?
 

dukebound85

macrumors Core
Jul 17, 2005
19,170
4,168
5045 feet above sea level
I'm not a very active member of these forums, so sorry if this has been discussed.

I'm guessing that Leopard is delayed because of possible Blu-ray addition to the Mac lineup. Of course this probably isn't the whole entire reason, but I think that added probably a month or two to the delay.

Any thoughts?

i doubt it. there isnt a clear winner yet for the next format as far as i know. apple will not risk it if hd dvd does indeed win out. plus leopard is software not hardware so you are talking about blu-ray or hd dvd compatibilty in the os right.

leopard is delayed because it is simply not ready. pure and simple
 

pilotError

macrumors 68020
Apr 12, 2006
2,237
4
Long Island
I thought the rumour was that they pulled a bunch of developers off of it to work on the iPhone.

LOL!

Yeah, I'd be inclined to think there wasn't any real back story other than they had to stabilize the core iPhone functionality. It should be good for Apple TV and ultimately the full OS X functionality as well.

I would venture to guess that you didn't see Blu-Ray / HD-DVD drives, because Leopard is late not the other way around. Cost probably had something to do with it as well. The drives are still in the $600+ range.
 

72930

Retired
May 16, 2006
9,060
4
Maybe there is substance in the theory that hardware is holding Leopard back...maybe something revolutionary such as touch sensitivity, but done Jeff Han style :)
 

Killyp

macrumors 68040
Jun 14, 2006
3,859
7
I think it's because OS X sales have risen since Vista was released. Apple realise they can get more sales out of Tiger and can afford to delay the release of Leopard.

It's just a hunch though.
 

PlaceofDis

macrumors Core
Jan 6, 2004
19,241
6
I think it's because OS X sales have risen since Vista was released. Apple realise they can get more sales out of Tiger and can afford to delay the release of Leopard.

It's just a hunch though.

i think there's more to it than that. i think they had a set of features and such that they wanted to incorporate, but just couldn't get it done within their time-table, especially with everything else going on at Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.