Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sure. If anyone gets funds for upgrading.

I am in the camp where instalment in a computer is really dumb idea. Have a lending products on a deprecating product is not smart move (one exception is car).

If I need a computer immediately and I only have $200, I would buy $200 computer and save up.
As an Individual, absolutely.

As a business, even if that business is a single person, buying in installments make a lot more sense, for income tax deduction reasons.

Many countries do not let you spread the cost of an item bought for business purposes over months, you can only deduct is as an expense in the for month you bought it. So leasing or paying in installments s a business makes sense, as yo can claim a deduction for every month you pay an installment.
 
Who said any of that? I recently read about a deal to get a new one at BestBuy for like $700-800.

One M1 Air or M1 Pro? M2 Air?

$700-$800 for new M1 Air seems be high.. M2 Air maybe.

I recently acquired a base M2 MacBook Air (8+256) for $1020, it is floor demo model. With open box discount, it was $899 and $1020 after sales tax (Canadian Dollar, around $750USD). Good deal, maybe? Is this a good buy? Depends on what you do.

I am not computer programmer, video editor nor I need do heavy work on a computer. The most I do is probably edit some family photos or videos and sent to family group chat. I can get all these done by an Intel laptop, so can you really say spending $1k is a good move? I brought it, because I wanted and I have spare cash.

The problem isn't should or should not buy AS Mac if you are loaded with cash. $700 -$800 isn't cheap, especially if you count sales tax into.


Apparently, 50% of Canadian are $200 away from not being able to pay bills. This is probably true for American as well.

Yes, buying Apple Silicon Mac would be good, but if half of country's population is $200 away from not being able to pay bills, $700-$800 computer would be very expensive, isn't it.

This is why, sub $300 laptop exists and people buy them.
 
Who said any of that? I recently read about a deal to get a new one at BestBuy for like $700-800.
If you read this thread closely people are coming into this thread with a budget of $200-400 so we are not talking about getting anything brand new. This is where admittedly the very narrow window of opportunity for Intel Macs comes through.

If your particular budget is $700-800 and you have plenty of experience with a second hand marketplaces/prepared to wait for a good bargain you can literally get anything you want for this kind of money as sometimes sellers are desperate for a quick sale.
 
But keep in mind, no-one should go buy Unibody MacBook Pros (2009-2012, non-retina), as these machines are very old. Sonoma and Sequoia aren't work well with these machines.
I'd argue that the 2012 Non Retina MacBook Pro (with SSD + Ram upgraded of course) is good with Sonoma and Sequoia if it was say $50... I have one on Sequoia and it's not the fastest thing in the world, but I haven't done a clean install since Monterey...

it's the oldest one that supports Metal.
 
Not a lot. But that is not point for the post. But M1 Air or Pro is 5 years old, battery is likely worn out and SSD life is questionable anyway. And just assume if battery are being replaced, you probably can find battery on an older Intel machine for much cheaper.

For most people who are shopping for used computer, price is most important thing and performance is secondary.




Top spec 16” MacBook Pro performs equal to baseline M1 Mac (not the M1 Pro). If you can found one for lesser price.


And I think spending 700 euro for 2019 M1 MBP as Windows machine isn’t good move either. You could easily find Windows laptop with better spec, aka anything Alder Lake above for this kind of money.



That’s the point or for people who don’t want spend a ton on a computer.



Baseline M1 Mac only offers 8+256. Good luck fining M1 Mac with these budget with 16+500. You can easily find Intel Mac with 16GB RAM and 512GB SSD less than baseline Mac.

And no, recent Intel MacBook does feel like 10 years ago. And cheap Intel is not waste of money. What is waste of money is spending more money for things you don’t need. If all I am doing is light computing task, spending more money on AS Mac is waste of money.
Wowy, way to dissect my comment, but I guess I appreciate the effort.

Ok, so. My girlfriend was in the market for a laptop around two years ago. We looked around but ultimately there was nothing checking enough boxes. Solid but compact build, good feeling keyboard with backlight, big and precise and tactile trackpad, great speakers, great big screen, at least 1TB of storage, enough RAM for multitasking and many tabs.
That 16“ 2019 was just the right fit and actually a decent deal compared to similar models.
It running Windows was a must have, it running macOS natively a big plus for me, because I wanted her to get in touch with this much more fun and user friendly OS anyway. Turns out she enjoys it quite a lot too, especially the trackpad gestures.
The only downsides are no USB A port, no HDMI and a very power hungry Windows partition (uses more energy than can be charged sometimes…)
According to iStat Menus and one other disk app, don’t know which anymore, the SSD still has a lifetime of more than 90% left, more than enough for her needs over the next 5 years. Battery is also still ok, it’s in the 80‘s range but she can still watch 6 hours of Netflix on it, and is this has become a USB C household since I got my 15 Pro, there is always a charger around.
I myself bought a used but almost mint M1 Pro that’s been used since 2021 and it’s battery and SSD are also still solid.
How do you defend old Intel Macs but for M1 Macs all of a sudden SSD lifetime and battery are important? I’d much rather replace my M1 Pro battery than having to look for an entire new top case that’s probably used, too…

May be that most people care less about the performance, but they really should with Intel Macs, depending on what they want to use them for. Any M Mac is very capably, but all the i5 i7 i9 this and that GHz bs was and is now more than ever very annoying and confusing.

Problem with any M1 Mac compared to the 2019 16“ is first the screen, second the speakers and third the native Windows compatibility. We don’t intend on spending money for a VM.
Also, no need for a 265 8GB machine. 1TB with 32GB is much more appropriate, and you seem to agree, so I don’t really know what this is about.

I also agree with you that for some people and some activities a used, cheap Intel Mac might be sufficient. Just not for all. And it’s difficult to recommend someone a Mac that will retain its software bugs and hardware problems for the rest of time.
Also, OCLP isn’t really mainstream consumer friendly, so I wouldn’t judge a Mac by being able to run it.
 
One M1 Air or M1 Pro? M2 Air?

$700-$800 for new M1 Air seems be high.. M2 Air maybe.

I recently acquired a base M2 MacBook Air (8+256) for $1020, it is floor demo model. With open box discount, it was $899 and $1020 after sales tax (Canadian Dollar, around $750USD). Good deal, maybe? Is this a good buy? Depends on what you do.

I am not computer programmer, video editor nor I need do heavy work on a computer. The most I do is probably edit some family photos or videos and sent to family group chat. I can get all these done by an Intel laptop, so can you really say spending $1k is a good move? I brought it, because I wanted and I have spare cash.

The problem isn't should or should not buy AS Mac if you are loaded with cash. $700 -$800 isn't cheap, especially if you count sales tax into.


Apparently, 50% of Canadian are $200 away from not being able to pay bills. This is probably true for American as well.

Yes, buying Apple Silicon Mac would be good, but if half of country's population is $200 away from not being able to pay bills, $700-$800 computer would be very expensive, isn't it.

This is why, sub $300 laptop exists and people buy them.
Ok, but what’s your point? You have spare cash, others don’t, that’s why <$300 laptops exist.
Ok?
If you can get a MacBook for that kind of money, should you, would you really? Do you need a Mac?
Do YOU need a Mac? Do you need so many Macs?
I agree, like I said, with the sentiment that used MacBooks make a very good starter Mac or casual laptop. I’d even say that’d there was never a better time to try a Mac and there was never a time when a capable Mac was as affordable as it is right now.
 
Ok, but what’s your point? You have spare cash, others don’t, that’s why <$300 laptops exist.
Ok?
If you can get a MacBook for that kind of money, should you, would you really? Do you need a Mac?
Do YOU need a Mac? Do you need so many Macs?
I agree, like I said, with the sentiment that used MacBooks make a very good starter Mac or casual laptop. I’d even say that’d there was never a better time to try a Mac and there was never a time when a capable Mac was as affordable as it is right now.

$300 MacBook Pro (let it be 2018 or 2019 model), is still better than Chromebook or these with Celeron, Pentium or possibly Core i3 model.

Again, if one gets money for AS Mac, they should. Otherwise, Intel Mac fill the void. It isn't like Intel Mac is too slow for anything. We aren't talking about Core 2 Duo, even the Sandy Bridge (like one found on 2011 Mac) are capable for light computing tasks.

I don't so many Mac, but I have spare cash, so I could. Probably not the smartest move.
 
Be it as it may I begin to resent the fact that you always need an internet connection to install a macOS on a M-series Macs, without internet connection your Apple Silicon Mac can be as good as a brick. It seems that Apple will also have all the power to control remotely the function of the Configurator and your ability to revive/restore your Mac, so your Apple Silicon Mac is not really "your Mac".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Be it as it may I begin to resent the fact that you always need an internet connection to install a macOS on a M-series Macs, without internet connection your Apple Silicon Mac can be as good as a brick. It seems that Apple will also have all the power to control remotely the function of the Configurator and your ability to revive/restore your Mac, so your Apple Silicon Mac is not really "your Mac".

Correct me if I'm wrong, you could create USB macOS installer and install macOS on Apple Silicon Macs.


Do I miss something?
 
i hear ya and no. intel became gross. we know the business. its documented. and there is a reason why tsmc is our god now. its the same story always over again. its a gem at first, then a rotten apple.

So Apple isn't gross in the sense of anti-repair practice? Or charging ridiculously expensive price for RAM and SSD upgrades?

One thing I really like about pre-touch bar Macs, was ability to upgrade RAM or SSD on our own.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, you could create USB macOS installer and install macOS on Apple Silicon Macs.

Do I miss something?
No, you MUST have an internet connection even with the USB macOS installer.

The latest Intel Mac I had experience with(2016 13" MBP) allowed you to do a COMPLETELY offline macOS installation.

So this is another major "+1" in favor of the Intel Macs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aoligei
No, you MUST have an internet connection even with the USB macOS installer.

The latest Intel Mac I had experience with(2016 13" MBP) allowed you to do a COMPLETELY offline macOS installation.

So this is another major "+1" in favor of the Intel Macs.

Oh well, that sucks...
 
>TLDR: I think there are still plenty of life left with Intel Mac and if one is looking to purchase an Mac on a budget, Intel MacBook Pros are still offers values that can't be matched by Apple Silicon Macs.

Hard disagree. The jump from Intel to M1 is enormous, utterly enormous. There is literally no good reason to get an Intel Mac unless you have some very unique use cases. You're throwing money away for a vastly inferior machine with far worse battery life and performance.
Agreed. I went from a fully maxed out i9 iMac to just the base M1 Mac Mini with RAM bump and storage bump. My video editing workflow increased drastically, never went back to the iMac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrono1081
You keep making the same argument over and over. An old used Intel Mac is cheaper than a new Silicon Mac. No debate there.

You say top dollar, I was talking about smart spending. You can buy a refurbished M1 MacBook Pro on Amazon right now for $500. Sure you can 'save' maybe $200 by finding an old Intel Mac, but where will you be in a couple of years? Spending another $300 on another old Mac ... or... happily using the M1. Sorry, that's where the smart money is.

Continuing to be penny wise is continuing to not save in the long run.

But yes, an old used Intel Mac is cheaper.
People always fall into this trap, especially on the Windows side. My grandma keeps updating her computers every year or two because she buys the CHEAPEST ONE POSSIBLE.

Meanwhile, my second generation Surface Laptop is still going strong and performs great for basic tasks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Plenty of videos of people demonstrating that 8GB M1 Mac minis/Airs can edit 4k video - without proxies in Final Cut. Check YouTube for the many examples demonstrating its performance. Basic 4k video work can be done on an iPad.

Yes, it will be limited in the size of the projects, but if you're looking at 6+ year old intel machines, presumably the size and scope of your projects is limited and the budget is small because it is a hobby and not paid work.

I'd suggest bumping the RAM and/or storage up, but it can be done in 8 GB.

People assume they need high end pro/max for dinky little side projects; the higher end machines are aimed at high end video work. The baseline machines Apple make are plenty for smaller hobby stuff.
Exactly this. I went from a 2019 i9 iMac fully maxed out, to the Mac Mini M1. While I did bump up the RAM and storage, I did test my FCP projects in the pure base model. I was so shocked. I was extremely disappointed in spending over $5,000+ for my iMac. Immediately sold it and got the M1 Mac Mini. While other areas of my workflow were lacking, the FCP tasks made up for it. I used this until the Macbook Pro launched, got that M1 Max and used that as my desktop in clamshell mode. Then I upgraded to the Mac Studio M1 Ultra.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
People always fall into this trap, especially on the Windows side. My grandma keeps updating her computers every year or two because she buys the CHEAPEST ONE POSSIBLE.

Meanwhile, my second generation Surface Laptop is still going strong and performs great for basic tasks.

Second generation Surface Laptop is going strong and performance great for basic task. The second generation Surface Laptop was released around 2018 and it is pretty cheap to buy one.

Something can be said for the MacBooks. Intel MacBooks are also going strong and performs great for basic tasks.

Your grandma is probably only use laptop for basic tasks, therefor the logic her is that, a basic computer would be okay for her. Whether it is your hands down Surface Laptop, or used MacBook Pro or new cheaper laptop.

There is absolutely no reason, for your grandma to spend upwards of $1000 for a new machine where she is not going to utilize the power.
 
Depends. It isn't a clear cut as some people think.

If you have tight budgets, Intel Mac is solution and it is capable for most of people.

The M1 MBA came out in 2020. It’s 2025. Intel was 2019 and before. M1 MBA is dirt cheap now. Now is not the time to buy a Mac that is about to get its last OS update and is from 2019 and before. Too many advantages with Apple silicon
 
Exactly this. I went from a 2019 i9 iMac fully maxed out, to the Mac Mini M1. While I did bump up the RAM and storage, I did test my FCP projects in the pure base model. I was so shocked. I was extremely disappointed in spending over $5,000+ for my iMac. Immediately sold it and got the M1 Mac Mini. While other areas of my workflow were lacking, the FCP tasks made up for it. I used this until the Macbook Pro launched, got that M1 Max and used that as my desktop in clamshell mode. Then I upgraded to the Mac Studio M1 Ultra.

You clearly need the computing power for your FCP project. There is no questions that you choose AS Mac over Intel.

Please people, we aren't talking about high end or power users. People need to realize that 99% of computer users aren't going for FCP project with multiple 4K video, sound tracks; or compelling huge coding projects.

People who just need a computer for light computing usage, Intel Macs are powerful enough and cheap enough. Mac Studio M1 Ultra isn't design for average users nor should purchase by average users.
 
The M1 MBA came out in 2020. It’s 2025. Intel was 2019 and before. M1 MBA is dirt cheap now. Now is not the time to buy a Mac that is about to get its last OS update and is from 2019 and before. Too many advantages with Apple silicon

M1 MacBook probably have similar support with 2020 Intel MacBook.

M1 MacBook Air probably only gets upwards of MacOS 27 and two more years of updates. Where last support Intel Mac get there more years of software update. Which means, it is quite possible that M1 MBA get dropped from support in the same years Intel Mac.

But in the same time, Intel Macs is capable of running Windows where M1 MBA is probably forever stuck with macOS.

M1 Macs, especially M1 MBA or MBP aren't worth to get at this year as well. All of them are 5 years old and approaching 6. M2 Macs onwards are the minimum people should get, if you are so concerned about future software updates.
 
But keep in mind, no-one should go buy Unibody MacBook Pros (2009-2012, non-retina), as these machines are very old. Sonoma and Sequoia aren't work well with these machines.
Honestly, depending on use case I'd beg to differ. I'm using a 2009 unibody white MacBook and with an SSD and RAM upgrade it works amazingly on older OS versions. I wouldn't recommend older OSes to everyone, but if you're relatively tech-savvy and know not to visit any shady Web sites, etc., it's really not as bad as people make it out to be. I've been using older OSes for years and years and still do regular virus scans and I've never been infected thus far.
 
Honestly, depending on use case I'd beg to differ. I'm using a 2009 unibody white MacBook and with an SSD and RAM upgrade it works amazingly on older OS versions. I wouldn't recommend older OSes to everyone, but if you're relatively tech-savvy and know not to visit any shady Web sites, etc., it's really not as bad as people make it out to be. I've been using older OSes for years and years and still do regular virus scans and I've never been infected thus far.
There is a difference between "go buy in 2025" and "using the ones you already have".

I am using my Late 2008 unibody MacBook with its original HDD and it works great for paying bills etc. But I would be reluctant to spend even $5 on it at this stage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uacd
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.