it would make sense. unfortunately it represents a terrible fracturing in the general marketplace of Audio accessories. Apple using Lightening and the rest of the world using USB C. Apple could put the Lightening port on it's computers but hey will also have USB C so no manufacturer is incentivized to target it, creating the situation of Apple including a dedicated port which may never serve any purpose on those machines. I expect that Apple's non-iOS products use USB C and that there is an overpriced adapter to Lightening for headphones and the like.
I think you may be on to things here. But I seriously hope that there is no removal of the magsafe, I love that connector so much.There are clues in the rumored leaks that the new case designs have room to include them. Add to that the elimination of MagSafe as a power method, and then removing the headphone jack in their most popular mobile devices. The Retina MacBook for instance is an ideal companion to the iPhone, and would benefit the most by replacing the headphone jack with a Lightning port. 1) It becomes a primary charging method using the same cable the iPhone uses, leaving the USB-C port free for peripherals. 2) It serves as a natively compatible headphone jack for the iPhone's Lightning headphones. 3) It serves an optional USB 3.0 port leaving the USB-C port free for something else to be used at the same time without a hub. 4) It allows Apple to simplify its adapter lineup by offering Lightning only adapters for common functions like SDXC card readers, USB 3.0 ports, HDMI ports, etc. It also allows a customer to immediately use any Lightning adapters they already own with a new rMB where the single port and prospect of buying a lot of USB-C adapters is a deterrent.
While I fully expect a Lightning headphone to USB-C adapter is in the works, I just can't imagine that Apple will require it for native use of the Lightning headphones on new Macs. I mean can you imagine the conversation where the Apple Store employee tells the customer that the new Lightning headphones they just purchased to use with their new iPhone will require an adapter to use with the new MacBook they just bought? Then again, I can't believe how bad this transition from 3.5mm headphone jack has been.
For the new Macs that potentially may be coming out before the end of the year, they may already have the audio port removed and replaced with Lightning ports. If the systems are in fact coming out in October as people are speculating, then the final design would already be in production at this point. And no one knows with 100% certainty, without a shadow of a doubt, what exactly the machines are going to be like.
I think you may be on to things here. But I seriously hope that there is no removal of the magsafe, I love that connector so much.
I suspect the (near) future Macs will still include a 3.5mm combo audio interface. The real bummer is the lightning headphones included with iPhones will be useless on Macs - I often kept my Apple EarPods in my bag and used them interchangeably with my iPhone and Mac. This will no longer be an option (without another adaptor). My real wish is that they would have moved the iPhone to a USB-C interface, but that would have meant design issues and very angry customers who already own zillions of lightning cables...
Why in the world would they add a lighting port to the Mac? It would be useless other than for then lightning headphones. Apple is slimming down ports, so why would they change it over to lightning for the sole purpose of audio? It will either have the 1/8" jack or it won't have either. But there would be no point in a lightning port on the Mac.
Desktop computers need standard "audio-in" and "audio-out" jacks.
If one needs more than that, one can use either USB or Firewire (with a thunderbolt-to-firewire convertor).
At the rate Apple's going, if they keep removing connections, how long until we see a "Mac dekstop" that is just "a box" with NO ports at all?
What kind of "desktop computer" will that be?
1) It becomes a primary charging method using the same cable the iPhone uses, leaving the USB-C port free for peripherals.
2) It serves as a natively compatible headphone jack for the iPhone's Lightning headphones.
3) It serves an optional USB 3.0 port leaving the USB-C port free for something else to be used at the same time without a hub.
4) It allows Apple to simplify its adapter lineup by offering Lightning only adapters for common functions like SDXC card readers, USB 3.0 ports, HDMI ports, etc. It also allows a customer to immediately use any Lightning adapters they already own, where the prospect of buying a lot of USB-C adapters is a deterrent.
1.) While lightning connectors specs are not publicly available, 12 Watts is the largest we have seen this far. And for a connect that was designed some 4 or 5 years ago (at least) for their low power mobile devices, it is unlikely that it is safely capable of delivering enough power. Even if it could handle double or triple the power of the 12watt supply used for the iPP, that would still be just enough for the rMB, not the 85Watts needed by Apples current flagship laptop. While I could see the new line being more efficient, it won't be THAT much more effecient. And USB C is sitting over here capable of 20Volts at 5Amps.. Quite a bit more than the 85Watt supply.
2.) Yes. It would.
3.) So I'm going to have to buy lightning to USB B to interface with a printer or lightning to MicroUSB to interface with a camera? Or have a bag full of adapters? Actually this sounds like Apple lately.
But still, you think it's more likely they would fragment the machine with a lightning port instead of another USB C?
4.) Literally the same point as number 3. While I see what you are getting at, I find it very unlikely. Most of those adapters are made for USB 2.0 standards, as the only lightning equipped device cable of 3.0 is the 12.9iPP. Also, the adapters have already been made for the rMB, and Apple loves spellings adapters.
It seems like Apple is about trimming down as much as possible to make it "simple." Lightning would be adding an all new port with limited use. And, less aware users would indefinitely be trying to plug lightning cables into USB C and vise versa. Heck people do that with HDMI and USB A, and they look far less similar than C and lightning.