I hope this doesn't turn into a Lightroom vs Aperture debate because they both have their strong points i assume, but I gotta tell you, I really love LR. It is amazing.
I use Photoshop all the time for editing purposes, but sometimes you just want to get to the good stuff for photos and LR does that for me. I won't use a few of the features like the print options very often with the price of ink being what it is, but the layouts are nice anyway. I dunno maybe if i was better at PS i wouldn't need this tool, but to be honest I would rather pay $200 for this than $600 for PS again, when all I want to do is photo work.
I did try and load Aperture, but it said I didn't have good enough specs. That to me is faulty planning on the software makers part. I run CS without a hitch and I run LR without a hitch.
So I have until April 30th to buy LR befre it jumps up $100, and you better believe I am going for it
I use Photoshop all the time for editing purposes, but sometimes you just want to get to the good stuff for photos and LR does that for me. I won't use a few of the features like the print options very often with the price of ink being what it is, but the layouts are nice anyway. I dunno maybe if i was better at PS i wouldn't need this tool, but to be honest I would rather pay $200 for this than $600 for PS again, when all I want to do is photo work.
I did try and load Aperture, but it said I didn't have good enough specs. That to me is faulty planning on the software makers part. I run CS without a hitch and I run LR without a hitch.
So I have until April 30th to buy LR befre it jumps up $100, and you better believe I am going for it