Is anyone else finding this?
My specs are M1Max 32GB RAM 24 Core GPU.
I'm new to the software, but after upgrading to a beast of a machine from what I was previously using (2010 MBP with upgraded SSD), I've managed to already crash the app a couple of times when I really got going on my edits.
I'm sure it has something to do with it running through Rosetta, or not quite being fully optimized for these new chips, or whatever. I don't know, I'm a photographer, not a computer tech-spec expert.
All I know is that If I were going to show off my new toy, It would not be by demo'ing workflow in Luminar Ai.
I test ran a similar export on the included "Photos" app and it was lightning quick at edits and exporting. and at the same resized size, the files ended up being almost a 3rd in size (1MB vs 350KB).
My main issue is that it's making my computer feel like my 2010 MBP. Doable, but old. I don't have any other software to test as I am against paying Adobe a monthly; my reason for trying out Luminar.
I zoom in quickly, it takes a second or so to buffer and bring the image into focus. I drag or side scroll while zoomed in, same thing. It feels laggy. Enough that it discourages edits or pixel peeping.
These are approx. 20MB RAW files. So not like I'm working with monster files, all things considered.
I lightly edited and exported 20 or so RAW files to a standard email jpeg friendly size, 1000x1500 pixels or so, and it took about a 30 seconds.
That's unacceptable on a machine that can allegedly destroy the export times of a Mac Pro with afterburner pushing out 8k footage, right?
I'm not sure whether to wait until Luminar Neo comes out (part of my bundled purchase presale) or request a refund and avoid learning a new software workflow thats just not going to be the right software for the M1 Max?
My specs are M1Max 32GB RAM 24 Core GPU.
I'm new to the software, but after upgrading to a beast of a machine from what I was previously using (2010 MBP with upgraded SSD), I've managed to already crash the app a couple of times when I really got going on my edits.
I'm sure it has something to do with it running through Rosetta, or not quite being fully optimized for these new chips, or whatever. I don't know, I'm a photographer, not a computer tech-spec expert.
All I know is that If I were going to show off my new toy, It would not be by demo'ing workflow in Luminar Ai.
I test ran a similar export on the included "Photos" app and it was lightning quick at edits and exporting. and at the same resized size, the files ended up being almost a 3rd in size (1MB vs 350KB).
My main issue is that it's making my computer feel like my 2010 MBP. Doable, but old. I don't have any other software to test as I am against paying Adobe a monthly; my reason for trying out Luminar.
I zoom in quickly, it takes a second or so to buffer and bring the image into focus. I drag or side scroll while zoomed in, same thing. It feels laggy. Enough that it discourages edits or pixel peeping.
These are approx. 20MB RAW files. So not like I'm working with monster files, all things considered.
I lightly edited and exported 20 or so RAW files to a standard email jpeg friendly size, 1000x1500 pixels or so, and it took about a 30 seconds.
That's unacceptable on a machine that can allegedly destroy the export times of a Mac Pro with afterburner pushing out 8k footage, right?
I'm not sure whether to wait until Luminar Neo comes out (part of my bundled purchase presale) or request a refund and avoid learning a new software workflow thats just not going to be the right software for the M1 Max?