Is anyone disappointed by the lack of ports on the new iMac? It’s a desktop computer that only has three more ports than a tablet.
Yes, there are additional ports. Upper models have two USB 4 (Thunderbolt) ports and two regular USB-C ports for a total of 4 ports, plus ethernet on the power brick.Big disappointment for me. No additional ports, large chin, large bezels again and no option for 16 GB as well
But the hard core enthusiasts aren't limited. All of these ports daisy chain or expand through hubs.I am guessing these base models are intended for the casual home user and not hardcore enthusiasts who need to have several things attached at all times.
The 24” iMac is not a pro machine. It’s a baseline consumer machine. The average consumer doesn’t need more than 4 ports on their Mac, and more and more tech has become wireless.Is anyone disappointed by the lack of ports on the new iMac? It’s a desktop computer that only has three more ports than a tablet.
There is an option for 16gb. Go to the compare page and select the 24” iMac. It says up to 16gb of ram.Big disappointment for me. No additional ports, large chin, large bezels again and no option for 16 GB as well
That is true.But the hard core enthusiasts aren't limited. All of these ports daisy chain or expand through hubs.
I doubt it. Four ports is fine for the majority of consumers. Anyone with more peripherals than that will use a hub.That is true.
I wonder if the casual home user, which they may get geared towards, have a regular need for something besides an external attach drive.
The 24” iMac is meant for families, reception desks, offices, colleges, students, kids: essentially anyone who is not a power user.
Definitely! But exactly this demographics has lots of USB-A stuff lying around and would like to use it without a dongle.
My Mac mini M1 has USB-A and I use it every day. Headphones, Garmin GPS, sticks, whatever. OK I have dongles but life is easier without them. Not sure if it was a good idea to skip USB-A in the consumer M1 iMac.
Four ports is enough for me (technically it has five), but I'd just get a hub if it were an issue.Is anyone disappointed by the lack of ports on the new iMac? It’s a desktop computer that only has three more ports than a tablet.
I was disappointed, if I’m honest. Not sure why USB A couldn’t have been included. If and when I buy an iMac again though, it’ll be the 27” version. It’s a shame there isn’t an M1 27” yet.
Big disappointment for me. No additional ports, large chin, large bezels again and no option for 16 GB as well
I was not. I expected the higher end machines to still be in the future. The M1 is basically an iPad Pro class of SoC with some Mac friendly enhancements such as Thunderbolt and more RAM. With one SoC Apple has been able to update five different product lines. It was not surprising to me at all that they would announce M1 based iPad Pros and smaller iMacs. Both those product lines were long overdue for a refresh.I was disappointed. Not at the lack of ports, as I'm not in the target market for this machine. I was disappointed that the higher end machines are still in the future.
I don't disagree, I was just hoping it would be a faster rollout.I was not. I expected the higher end machines to still be in the future. The M1 is basically an iPad Pro class of SoC with some Mac friendly enhancements such as Thunderbolt and more RAM. With one SoC Apple has been able to update five different product lines. It was not surprising to me at all that they would announce M1 based iPad Pros and smaller iMacs. Both those product lines were long overdue for a refresh.
It will take more time to equal the higher end GPUs in the 2020 iMac, Mac Pro and even the 16" MBP. The M1 is giving the CPUs in the 16" MBP a hard time but the desktop Mac's Intel CPUs are faster and have more cooling and power available to them. The Mac Pro in particular can be configured with a 28 core CPU and 1.5 TB of RAM with 64GB of video RAM. Even the iMac can be configured with 10 high speed cores and 128GB of system RAM and 16GB of Video RAM.