Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

majormike

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 15, 2012
113
42
A few days ago, I put a benchmark together with native third party plugins in Logic Pro and compared it with my 9900KS running at 5 GHz on all cores in Pro Tools Ultimate.

I created the same chain of plugins, same FX busses and same bus processing, identical.

On the M1, it's about 37 activated tracks, in Pro Tools Ultimate on my 9900KS, which is equivalent to a 12 Core Mac Pro 2019, about 34 tracks.

M1 37 vs 9900KS 34 tracks.

Which means the M1 has more Processing power / equal in Logic than a 12 Core Mac Pro from 2019 in Avid's Pro Tools.

The Session was set up using Fabfilter and Valhalla plugins (which are available both in Apple Silicon) using a Lynx Aurora (n) with 1024 buffer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Screech

08380728

Cancelled
Aug 20, 2007
422
165
Astoundingly vague and absent of many details:
what M1 and what 9900KS?
what interface
what buffer
any audio on the tracks, any automation
what plugins

I give up.
 

majormike

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 15, 2012
113
42
Astoundingly vague and absent of many details:
what M1 and what 9900KS?
what interface
what buffer
any audio on the tracks, any automation
what plugins

I give up.
The Session was set up using Fabfilter and Valhalla plugins (which are available both in Apple Silicon) using a Lynx Aurora (n) with 1024 buffer.

Macbook Pro M1.
 
Last edited:

majormike

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 15, 2012
113
42
Screenshot 2021-03-22 at 10.44.35.png

ptbenchmark.jpg


Both sessions run in 44.1 KHz.

If Pro Tool's thread optimisation was better, I could probably run 2 more tracks but it already maxes out that way.
 

robco74

macrumors 6502a
Nov 22, 2020
509
944
Pretty impressive, considering it's unsupported and likely running under Rosetta.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.