Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cal6n

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Jul 25, 2004
2,096
273
Gloucester, UK
Scaling the display using the option key to access more resolutions appears to be disabled on the new MBP.

Or am I missing something?

I’m trying to get the display’s native resolution of 2560x1440 so I can benchmark Civilization 6 like-for-like against my iMac.
 

MK500

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2009
434
550
The native resolution is actually 2560 x 1600. This will let you choose: RDM 2.2 (free, open source)


Screen Shot 2020-11-24 at 10.27.14 AM.png
 

FilmIndustryGuy

macrumors 6502a
May 12, 2015
612
393
Manhattan Beach, CA
how does this whole thing work with monitors? I got a 32 inch 4k monitor and I didn't like how small things looked so changed the 3800 to 3000 resolution and now it looks better but not as good as the Mac screen when it comes to text sharpness. Does scaling mean the resolution is still 4k but everything looks bigger instead of tiny meaning the resolution will be 4k no matter what scaling I choose?
 

MK500

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2009
434
550
The resolutions with the lightning bolts are running the display at its full resolution, but interpolating the pixels such that the size of object/text/windows is equivalent to whatever resolution you choose. The resolutions without the lightning bolts actually change the display resolution to a lower resolution.

You have to kind of test to see what you like best. In a perfect world a lightning bolt resolution that is exactly half your actual resolution is probably the best looking. If we call that a 2x scale, then oddly 1.5x scales also often look pretty good. I usually run my M1 Air at 1680x1050 for example. It gives me a pretty decent information density, but also sharp text.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.