Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Wicked1

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Apr 13, 2009
3,283
14
New Jersey
I am getting one or the other with 4 GB Ram, don't really care about the disk space I have enough external to go around.

Is the 2.26 really worth the $150.00 Clams more that it costs.

I have a New Unibody MacBook with the 2.4 anyone have both I am curious if the 2.26 is close to the MacBook 2.4. As far as the Nvidia 9400M I do not expect the same performance as my MacBook Pro 2.93 with 4 GB Ram.

I just gave my son my MacBook 2.4 which I loved but I broke down for the 2.93 MBP and now I am looking for a toy Desktop for playing around with bc we have Macs at work so I can carry it back and forth, iMac to me is just not worth the limitations bc I have a 24" 2.1 Ghz at work, nice but not for me.


Wicked1
 
I weighed the pros/cons on the 2.0 vs. 2.26. I have a thread on here about it. Search my previous posts to see what others said.

I went with the 2.0/4GB/320GB. I hope to have it in my hands tomorrow.
 
iMac Limitations

I mean a MacBook or Mac Min can be carried from place to place, but an iMac is a stationary Desktop, that is what I meant.


Wicked1
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.