Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
seems disingenuous for TB3 on type-C to be called a superset for type-C if it doesn't offer everything USB offers when using the same port.
That's the beauty of USB-C: One physical connector for a variety of protocols which are incompatible to each other. The only thing you can rely on when you see an USB-C connector is basic USB 2.0 support, everything else is optional.
 
Reviving this thread to check if anyone has tried the Iiama 5K monitor. It is listed at Amazon UK at £768, how good can it be for this price?
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: Squuiid
Reviving this thread to check if anyone has tried the Iiama 5K monitor. It is listed at Amazon UK at £768, how good can it be for this price?
DisplayPort 1.4. This is what we have all been waiting for.
Shame its supposedly only an 8-bit panel however.

This should work out of the box with any cMP with an RX/Vega or 10xx series card.


DISPLAY CHARACTERISTICS
Diagonal 27"; 68.3cm
Aspect ratio 16 : 9
Panel IPS LED
Native resolution DisplayPort (v.1.4): 5120 x 2880 @60Hz (14.7 megapixel)
Brightness 440 cd/m² typical
Static contrast 1 200 : 1 typical
Advanced contrast 80 000 000 : 1 ACR
Response time 4ms
Viewing zone horizontal/vertical: 178°/ 178°; right/left: 89°/ 89°; up/down: 89°/ 89°
Display colour 16.7 million
Blue Light Reducer yes
Flicker Free Led yes
Display area h x w 334.8 x 595.2 mm; 13.2" x 23.4"
Pixel pitch h x v 0.116 x 0.116 mm
Resolutions DisplayPort (v.1.4): max.5120 x 2880 @60Hz, HDMI: max.3840x2160 @60Hz
Horizontal sync 30 - 180kHz
Vertical sync 55 - 75Hz
PIP (Picture in Picture) PiP, PbP

https://iiyama.com/gl_en/products/prolite-xb2779qqs-s1/

https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/7qw2re/iiyama_prolite_xb2779qqss1_the_first_5k_monitor/
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: vddobrev
May I ask, overall how is your experience with the monitor.

I'm used to an LG5K and iMac5K - how does the panel compare and how user-friendly is the brightness control?
Can a VESA mount be attached?
Overall, a great experience.

It has the typical section-based On-Screen-Display, which is controlled by 4 touch-sensitive buttons. It takes four taps to be adjusting the brightness (I settled on Contrast 50, Brightness 60 and never change it now. Also disabled all the post-processing features and set the colour temperature to "Normal"). It has a nice so-called "Dot by Dot" mode (aka 1:1), meaning that you can show a less than 5K signal with black borders rather than being upscaled.

Based on the advertised specs (oddly they say 6-bit panel, but no such 5K panel seems to exist), there's some question about the image quality. But as someone who's actually used it, I have no complaints about any aspect of the image quality. This is from someone who, although not a pro photo/video editor, is fussy about just about everything when it comes to computers (I was already seeking out IPS monitors in the mid 2000s).

Haven't used the LG UltraFine personally, but compared to the 5K iMac, this monitor doesn't feel substantially different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alchemistics
interesting, at one stage Phillips had a Europe-only 5K display, that used the same panel as Dell & HP. 2 DP and 3 HDMI in, looks like a good option - I skimmed the manual, couldn't tell if it's a dual cable for 5K.
 
It's a DP 1.4 display, so they might've skipped the dual-cable DP 1.2 support. Wouldn't buy it until someone confirms support.
 
Just curious, has DP 1.4 support in macOS already been verified/tested? I mean, Apple doesn't sell a single Mac with DP 1.3/1.4 outputs, so there's no need to support it...
 
Just curious, has DP 1.4 support in macOS already been verified/tested? I mean, Apple doesn't sell a single Mac with DP 1.3/1.4 outputs, so there's no need to support it...

I personally believe the LG 5K monitor is actually communicated via DP1.4 which embedded into Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C). Therefore, those new Mac can connect it at 5K Hz, but older Thunderbolt 2 Mac can only connect it at 4K 60Hz.

Even though there is no prove, but I believe the chance is there.

CORRECTION: There is NO DP1.4 support in TB3. TB3 still using DP1.2 standard.

[doublepost=1516487841][/doublepost]
From their web site.....

"Apple - Mac All iiyama monitors are compatible with Apple-Macintosh computers."

I notice this statement as well, but it means almost nothing. Any Mac can connect to it and display something (even as worst as 640x480) can fit into that statement. Compatible can means "backward compatibility", not necessary means "fully functioning" as expected.
 
Last edited:
I personally believe the LG 5K monitor is actually communicated via DP1.4 which embedded into Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C). Therefore, those new Mac can connect it at 5K Hz, but older Thunderbolt 2 Mac can only connect it at 4K 60Hz.

Even though there is no prove, but I believe the chance is there.
[doublepost=1516487841][/doublepost]

I notice this statement as well, but it means almost nothing. Any Mac can connect to it and display something (even as worst as 640x480) can fit into that statement. Compatible can means "backward compatibility", not necessary means "fully functioning" as expected.


Agree. I had the Dell 5k which was supposed to work but it was far from plug and go.... I returned it for a nice Dell 4k and I'm much happier with it...
 
I personally believe the LG 5K monitor is actually communicated via DP1.4 which embedded into Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C). Therefore, those new Mac can connect it at 5K Hz, but older Thunderbolt 2 Mac can only connect it at 4K 60Hz.
From my knowledge TB3 doesn't support DP1.3/1.4, they're sending two DP1.2 streams over a single cable to enable 5K.
 
thing that confuses me - USB3/C has DP 1.3 or 1.4 available within it, and TB3 has USB3 within it, but it doesn't carry USB3's higher spec DP signal?
 
thing that confuses me - USB3/C has DP 1.3 or 1.4 available within it, and TB3 has USB3 within it, but it doesn't carry USB3's higher spec DP signal?

Thunderbolt 3 uses a USB-C connector, but it does not use a USB-C controller so it does not support USB-C's Alternate Mode (which supports DP1.3) and therefore is limited to the DP1.2 support of the TB3 specification.
 
Thunderbolt 3 uses a USB-C connector, but it does not use a USB-C controller so it does not support USB-C's Alternate Mode (which supports DP1.3) and therefore is limited to the DP1.2 support of the TB3 specification.

ahh right, so DP 1.3 is granted to USB by the type-c port. USB over type-c is different to USB over a TB3 type-c connector. *facepalm*

seems disingenuous for TB3 on type-C to be called a superset for type-C if it doesn't offer everything USB offers when using the same port.
 
But I would wait for at least one review before jumping on it... In general, I like the looks of the monitor with the all glass front, but how good is it?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.