Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MP 1,1-5,1 Mac pro 5.1 as a server/NAS

T

tollickd

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jan 10, 2010
118
72
Hey all

Ok I have been offered a Mac pro 5.1 (2010) with specs of:

2 x 2.4 ghx Xeon quad core
16 GB 1066 MHz DDR3
Ati Radeon 5770
and 256 GB ssc boot drice and 5 TB HDD

I am wanting to create a server at home that can be used to back up my macs and iphones and to use it as a Media/NAS.

Is this total over kill and will cost too much to run in power over time or should I opt for a Mac mini 2014 with a few ext HDD attached?

Any advise would be great thanks
 
There's a video of this guy who converted his Mac Pro to a NAS server. He mentioned that cost is minimal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bmoraski
This just makes sense if you run the "server" just when needed. 24/7 costs to much energy.

Plus you have an old GPU what eats a lot of power plus a dual processor board. Maybe set in a energy efficient gpu like a RX560 or a Nvidia Kepler.

And replace the dual cpu board with a single cpu board.

But after all this beast still eats a whole lot of energy in 24/7
 
  • Like
Reactions: arw
ok good to know thanks guys. Maybe it will be over the top for my needs, messaged the guy to see if he would drop price no go 300 EUR
 
Macsonic said:
There's a video of this guy who converted his Mac Pro to a NAS server.
Click to expand...
In this example he is using a single 16TB drive in his 5.1 to BACKUP an existing Drobo NAS server.

You can use any old Mac to do that.

And in this example setup, he could just use an external 16TB USB device attached to his 2019 Mac Pro to achieve the same result, negating the use of the 5.1 entirely.
 
Last edited:
tollickd said:
Is this total over kill and will cost too much to run in power over time or should I opt for a Mac mini 2014 with a few ext HDD attached?
Click to expand...
The nice thing about the 5.1 is that you can have all the hard drives inside the machine. No external wires nor enclosures nor power supplies.

For 300 Euors you might be better off buying a cheap Synology NAS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuperCachetes and G5isAlive
Macsonic said:
He mentioned that cost is minimal.
Click to expand...
The INITIAL cost.
While I use a 5,1 as a main computer for years now, it is an extremely power hungry machine even doing nothing. Here it is with two X5690s, 3 NVMe drives (no spinners) and a single Safari window, the very one I am typing this text into, opened:

IMG_7CDAC3DFBE0A-1.jpeg


In regards of a NAS, I am well catered with a Dell OptiPlex 7060 running a number of VMs under ESXi and a "dumb" (non-NAS) 4-disk enclosure hooked to it via USB3. Total power consumption of these two is below 80W.
 
hwojtek said:
The INITIAL cost.
While I use a 5,1 as a main computer for years now, it is an extremely power hungry machine even doing nothing. Here it is with two X5690s, 3 NVMe drives (no spinners) and a single Safari window, the very one I am typing this text into, opened:

View attachment 2169660
Click to expand...

Ok power here in Cyprus is at stupid levels already now i think a mac mini will defiantly for my needs.
 
Yep, I looked into this several years back, actually own an old 2010 Mac Pro... and decided it was STILL cheaper to buy a purpose built synology that had about 5% of the total energy costs. Of course, the Mac Pro running 24/7 acted as a better heater than the synology NAS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arw
Just to throw some Euros into consideration: Assuming 130 W idle power consumption and an electricity price of 0,30 €/kWh results in 342 €/year.
A simple DIY Windows Server, Mac mini or a NAS consumes less than 10% of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: foliovision and G5isAlive
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back