Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

adonis3k

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Apr 15, 2012
565
119
Hi all,

I have 2013 Mac Pro with 16GB or ram but want to upgrade to 64. The stuff inside runs at 1866mhz but have seen some 64GB which runs at 1600mhz, will this make a major difference in performance in day to day tasks, mainly photoshop/after effects.

Thanks
 
Hi all,

I have 2013 Mac Pro with 16GB or ram but want to upgrade to 64. The stuff inside runs at 1866mhz but have seen some 64GB which runs at 1600mhz, will this make a major difference in performance in day to day tasks, mainly photoshop/after effects.

Thanks

I will be very surprised if you can tell any different.
 
I will be very surprised if you can tell any different.
I agree. If you look at the subtests of benchmarks that stress memory bandwidth, you'll see a difference.

If you look at the subtests that measure performance of useful applications, the difference is small to noise.

The reason is that the memory subtests deliberately try to defeat the effects of memory caches to measure the raw bandwidth from DIMMs to/from CPU.

Applications, on the other hand, are usually written to make the best use of cache.
 
So I should go for it instead of spending xx amount more for 1866 stuff?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.