but boooy wouldn't it be amazing? hahalaidbackliam said:good lord, who needs that much ram?
I agree completely.Flowbee said:Their line-up is suspiciously missing a sub-$2000 "pro" desktop. A $1700 Mac Pro Cube or Mac Pro mini would fit very nicely.
isn't that where the iMac comes into play? it's not a "pro" computer, but it's better than the mini.Flowbee said:Their line-up is suspiciously missing a sub-$2000 "pro" desktop. A $1700 Mac Pro Cube or Mac Pro mini would fit very nicely.
Sli doesn't work that way. In fact, dual sli only lets you have ONE display. (1, UNO!) I don't know about quad sli, though.srobert said:Support for up to 8 displays? (20-23")
Now if only they could make those screen bezel narrower…
daxpd28 said:I've heard that it's usually better to wait for the second batch of a new line before purchasing, due to various bugs that get worked out.
Is there any truth to that?
michaeldmartin said:Sli doesn't work that way. In fact, dual sli only lets you have ONE display. (1, UNO!) I don't know about quad sli, though.
MovieCutter said:Nope, BUY NOW!!!!
I don't know anything about the driver they use; but i'm guessing they're not going to allow that..menziep said:Yeah but the can work on there own
So you can have 8 displays
michaeldmartin said:Ah, crap! No sli?!
>.<
What's the point of having multiple cards without sli?!
Graphics will go as slow as $#!@ with two displays on a single 7300. I mean; you're better off with an imac!Sesshi said:Because SLI is hopeless for multi-monitor use?
michaeldmartin said:Ah, crap! No sli?!
>.<
What's the point of having multiple cards without sli?!