This isn't "ordinary ram" -- it's fully-buffered (FB) RAM, which can be more expensive. Who knows whether you MUST use FB RAM or if it an option like ECC. We'll see once people start playing around with the new machines.damado said:Is there another place I can order RAM from cheaper than directly from Apple?
I saw the pictures of the RAM sticks in there and they look pretty different from anything else I've ever seen.
No. FB-DIMM's have a controller on the memory stick that acts as a buffer (hence the name) between the system controller and the memory. The reason is that in the past, the memory controller wrote directly to the memory and had a pin on the memory stick to access each section of RAM. Using a FB-DIMM, you can keep the same pin-out on the DIMM (it's a serial interface between the system memory controller and the buffer) and still increase the RAM size. ECC is usually incorporated into FB-DIMM's because the memory buffer can implement this feature.spicyapple said:Isn't FB the same as ECC?
Sun Baked said:>Rapmastac1
This isn't APPLE memory, it is INTEL Memory.
It is the same memory they use with the Intel S5000XVN Server/Workstation, just use that as you machine when you look around if they have not updated their database.
Though buy from the people that guarantee that it will work in the Mac Pro anyway, since Apple tends to play some games with firmware upgrades every now and then.
Intel doesn't make them, it is just one of the "next generation" memory specs they are pushing like they did RIMM modules before.carletonmusic said:I'm pretty sure Apple still uses Samsung as its supplier for RAM.
I'd say you're wrong on everything except the graphics card thing - that really needs some work. You can get a stick of RAM at any reasonable computer place and stick it in - I bought some Kingston RAM from Circuit City and stuck it in my mini with no problem. Everything else should plug in no problem.Rapmastac1 said:See, this is the only reason I don't LOVE apple. They have great computers, but it would be great, if I could go out, and get a new stick of ram, and not worry, or get a new graphics card, and have no worry about upgrading it.
True. JEDEC publishes the spec, like a lot of other RAM specs.Sun Baked said:Intel doesn't make them, it is just one of the "next generation" memory specs they are pushing like they did RIMM modules before.
Yeah, but that article is over two years old, so I'm not sure how meaningful those qualms are in real-world terms now.simie said:Here is some info on the new FB-Dimms according to Intel - The guys at Arstechnica disagree with some of Intels comments.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20040416-3668.html
Old Intel Development Forum news -- last paragraph ...Cocobolo said:How important is the Apple heatsink? I was just about to order the Kingston ram on eggsoft, but now I'm confused. I've never bought my ram from Apple, but now I'm wondering if I should have. I'm sure this will be a confusing subject as more Mac Pro are shipped.
The Intel machines don't require anything more than heatspreaders, and I doubt that it'll affect DIMM life.Makosuke said:I'll also add that both Crucial and DMS are selling RAM that is explicitly for the Mac Pro, and with a lifetime warranty, so if it turns out the heatsink is NOT adequate and the RAM glitches or fails, they'll replace it for free--their bad for selling it to you in the first place. But I'm reasonably confident that both makers know enough about what they're doing to sell stuff that'll work, and if for some fluke reason the first run of sticks fail prematurely, you can be certain that the replacements won't, since both companies no doubt sell plenty of RAM to Apple customers.
Makosuke said:The heatsinks, as I understand it, are because of the small processor on the FB-DIMM--it generates some heat of its own. I expect that the airflow to the RAM is as good in an Apple tower as any other server, so if the heatsinks on the RAM are sufficient to cool the chip in a regular server, I can't imagine it would be an issue in the Mac Pro. Apple is probably just being extra-cautious.
wdhpgx said:Yeah. So if you didn't catch the other thread, Crucial has pulled their MacPro dimms, because apparently they don't have sufficient heat dispersion.
Frustrating. I just don't think the default 1gb in this machine is going to do it for me; I'm already used to the 2gb in my powerbook. I really hate to pay Apple's price for ram, too. Ugh.
Has anyone ordered dimms from other vendors (OWC, Datamem, etc) that seems to have decent heatsinks on theirs??
ehurtley said:FB-DIMMs are just a new standard. They are a standard, though, so they will be common sooner or later. They aren't REQUIRED to have a heatsink, but in Apple's enclosure, it's probably a good idea to make sure you get ones that have one.
And Crucial Technology, (the retail arm of memory manufacturer Micron,) does have them in stock, and the Mac Pro is even listed in their 'Memory Advisor' tool. (Yes, they are significantly cheaper than Apple, but they only have 1 GB modules, so if you want to reach the full 16 GB, you have to go somewhere else.)