Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iTechInfo

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 10, 2010
7
0
hey guys im going to get a macbook air (new) and was thinking of also getting an imac (used) or powermac (used) the imac would be a 17" or 20" white imac
the powermac a 1.8ghz-2.5ghz
cheers
 
Don't buy PowerPC based Macs. iMac comes with a display so I would get one but make sure it's Intel
 
Don't buy PowerPC based Macs. iMac comes with a display so I would get one but make sure it's Intel
why not getting a powerpc processor mac? , they are still good performing
and the lamp (iMac g4 ) 20 inch is a design icon for collectors , and still usable
for normal use
the used intel macs are way overpriced , in most cases they are sold at a price range that brings them already close to a basic NEW version of the same mac , on which you got warranty
 
why not getting a powerpc processor mac? , they are still good performing
and the lamp (iMac g4 ) 20 inch is a design icon for collectors , and still usable
for normal use
the used intel macs are way overpriced , in most cases they are sold at a price range that brings them already close to a basic NEW version of the same mac , on which you got warranty

They DON'T perform well. ANY Intel Mac is faster than PPC (excluding G5 PowerMacs and maybe iMacs). There is no support for PPC anymore and buying one is waste of money IMO unless you would use it as a server or smth like that.

Sure they can still be used but almost all web sites have Flash nowadays and they just can't handle it properly. Why not to pay little more and get Mac that is still supported in future
 
They DON'T perform well. ANY Intel Mac is faster than PPC (excluding G5 PowerMacs and maybe iMacs). There is no support for PPC anymore and buying one is waste of money IMO unless you would use it as a server or smth like that.

Sure they can still be used but almost all web sites have Flash nowadays and they just can't handle it properly. Why not to pay little more and get Mac that is still supported in future

my eMac has no problems with flash , i dont know what all the fuss is about with intel
 
my eMac has no problems with flash , i dont know what all the fuss is about with intel

Does Youtube videos work without lag? How about websites with Flash content? I don't have a PPC Mac so I'm just telling what I've heard... But seriously, PPC is old, admit it. Buy one is same as buying a PC with Pentium 4 inside. Sure it works but is it worth it?
 
my eMac has no problems with flash , i dont know what all the fuss is about with intel

Even my 2GHz DualCore G5 had serious problems with Flash!

Flash is a general issue on OS X since it's only software rendered and the faster the processor, the better OS X can handle Flash. Since the Intel processors are way more powerful than the old Power PC processors, it runs better on the current systems.
 
go with intel.. future proof.. the slight cost benefit of PPC vs Intel will not last in the long run..

in most cases ;)
 
I was running a PPC machine until December last year. I didn't know what the big deal was. The new intel machine I bought in January simply crushes it in every way and its only the basic spec running a c2d.
 
Does Youtube videos work without lag? How about websites with Flash content? I don't have a PPC Mac so I'm just telling what I've heard... But seriously, PPC is old, admit it. Buy one is same as buying a PC with Pentium 4 inside. Sure it works but is it worth it?

youtube works fine as long as i dont select hd video content , and i rarely use youtube anyway , but all the videos about ppc macs on youtube work just fine
and for flash content , i do some online games (mafia wars @facebook) and it just works fine , and for other websites i have not the slightest problem , they just open fine , thats why i often dont understand it when others with same G4 eMacs/imacs have problems , ok the fact that i upgraded the ram to 2GB kingston platinum series on it might help a bit
 
Any Intel Mac you get now is going to kick the crap out of any PPC Mac you'll get. But that's not even why you shouldn't get one. Apple has stopped supporting PPC on new versions of OSX. This may not seem like a big deal now since PPCs can use Leopard and the current is Snow Leopard; but as new versions of the OS come out, you'll be stuck with Leopard for all eternity.
 
Any Intel Mac you get now is going to kick the crap out of any PPC Mac you'll get. But that's not even why you shouldn't get one. Apple has stopped supporting PPC on new versions of OSX. This may not seem like a big deal now since PPCs can use Leopard and the current is Snow Leopard; but as new versions of the OS come out, you'll be stuck with Leopard for all eternity.

.., they might be better , faster or whatever ,but i love the old mac's and so far apart from hd video i did not come across anything i could not do with them ,
and i think they look more authentic with the older operating systems , but thats just my opinion , you dont have to agree or follow me there
when i tried leopard on my eMac (which did not improve the overall performance on my eMac ) i felt like i had committed a crime and showed remorse and put tiger back on....

but i have to say i dont use the computer at home to earn money with it , just for fun and as a hobby ,so i prefer style over high performance and i have seen snow leopard and used it when i setup a mates iMac i7 , its just too flashy , dont like that at all
 
for what's it worth, my pb runs like crap... Flash and youtube forget about it. My imac however I have no real issues with everyday stuff.
See sig for specs)
 
.., they might be better , faster or whatever ,but i love the old mac's and so far apart from hd video i did not come across anything i could not do with them ,
and i think they look more authentic with the older operating systems , but thats just my opinion , you dont have to agree or follow me there
when i tried leopard on my eMac (which did not improve the overall performance on my eMac ) i felt like i had committed a crime and showed remorse and put tiger back on....

but i have to say i dont use the computer at home to earn money with it , just for fun and as a hobby ,so i prefer style over high performance and i have seen snow leopard and used it when i setup a mates iMac i7 , its just too flashy , dont like that at all

I can't believe I'm actually reading this. You're kidding, right? Please tell me you're kidding.
 
...
when i tried leopard on my eMac (which did not improve the overall performance on my eMac ) i felt like i had committed a crime and showed remorse and put tiger back on....

Did you really notice a difference from Tiger to Leopard?

I used Tiger for almost 3 years till I moved to Leopard and besides the new styled Dock, I haven't noticed any major difference. It feels absolutely the same and performance improvements weren't noticeable for me.

The same applies for Snow Leopard, after using Leopard for almost a year, I haven't noticed any difference at all (besides the slightly modified Exposé and the new functionality of stacks which I use constantly).

But for me, all three versions are basically the same OS. All of them are rock solid (on my computers) and fast.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.