How is it possible that pcmag.com's review and macworld's could have such wildly different results for their "DVD battery drain" tests? Macworld quotes 3.5 hrs of DVD playback to pcmag's pathetic 2hrs and 10 minutes.
macworld:
http://www.macworld.com/2006/05/reviews/mbookmain/index.php
pcmag:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1971099,00.asp
I don't remember if Macworld's specific model is mentioned, so it could possibly be the 1.8 vs PcMag's 2.0 black model. But nevertheless, just over 2 hours is unacceptable. Could macbook owners post their own results with battery life?
Edit: ArsTechnica's review also shows over 3 hours for DVD playback:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/macbook.ars/6
macworld:
http://www.macworld.com/2006/05/reviews/mbookmain/index.php
pcmag:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1971099,00.asp
I don't remember if Macworld's specific model is mentioned, so it could possibly be the 1.8 vs PcMag's 2.0 black model. But nevertheless, just over 2 hours is unacceptable. Could macbook owners post their own results with battery life?
Edit: ArsTechnica's review also shows over 3 hours for DVD playback:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/macbook.ars/6