Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Miggins1610

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Nov 15, 2020
4
0
Hi there. After years of getting crappy refurbished computers and never lasting long, I have decided to go for the M1 macbook pro..

I want to get an external hard drive but confused about what drives would be compatible.

Thunderbolt 3 (up to 40Gb/s)
USB 3.1 Gen 2 (up to 10Gb/s)

Those are what it says the ports are. Are there any reasonable hard drives around £100 that would work.

I was looking at the western digital

[/URL]
 

Zazoh

macrumors 68000
Jan 4, 2009
1,518
1,122
San Antonio, Texas
Go to Apple site, see what they offer, if nothing at price point you want, then search google for same specs. There is a 2TB external For $99 (U.S.)
 

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
Hi there. After years of getting crappy refurbished computers and never lasting long, I have decided to go for the M1 macbook pro..

I want to get an external hard drive but confused about what drives would be compatible.

Thunderbolt 3 (up to 40Gb/s)
USB 3.1 Gen 2 (up to 10Gb/s)

Those are what it says the ports are. Are there any reasonable hard drives around £100 that would work.

I was looking at the western digital

[/URL]

I can't think of an external USB or Thunderbolt drive that wouldn't work.

Speed costs though. The inexpensive high capacity drives tend to be slow. Fast drives (external SSD) tend to to be expensive.

Both of these work fine with my macbooks:

The 1TB SSD is well over 10x faster than the 2TB spinning drive.
 

lightfire

macrumors regular
Aug 10, 2017
143
30
Certainly should, although a DIY setup is perhaps better suited for those who needn't ask what's compatible. :p
It is certainly not rocket science to insert a nvme disk in an enclosure. And yes, it should work fine. The problem with it is that speed wont be optimized for USB4. I would think the Thunderbolt drives may offer the optimal solutions, but personally will be fine with my “DIY” setup. 2TB drive in a very small enclosure - love it.
 

Taru

macrumors newbie
May 31, 2021
2
0
Buffalo USB-C SSDs does not work on M1, while they work perfectly on Intel Macs.

I myself became a little scared of buying stuff for M1 without confirmation, that it works.
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
Bear in mind that there are many USB 3.1 drives and enclosures that don't run at the advertised speeds with the M1 Macs. For example, I have some USB 3.1 gen 2 enclosures that should support 10Gbps that only connect at 5Gbps on the M1 (but work correctly on an Intel Mac). I also have some Samsung SSDs (T5 & T7) that connect at 10Gbps, but get considerably slower sustained read/write speeds on the M1 compared to the same drive on an Intel Mac (c. 700MBps vs 950MBps read speeds).

This may not be significant to you, but it is useful to know if you are using external disks for applications with high bandwidth requirements (e.g. 4K+ video editing).

Thunderbolt 3 external disks work better, but you pay a premium, and there is a lot of variation in performance, so you really need see real-world results for specific drives.
 

Taru

macrumors newbie
May 31, 2021
2
0
Bear in mind that there are many USB 3.1 drives and enclosures that don't run at the advertised speeds with the M1 Macs. For example, I have some USB 3.1 gen 2 enclosures that should support 10Gbps that only connect at 5Gbps on the M1 (but work correctly on an Intel Mac). I also have some Samsung SSDs (T5 & T7) that connect at 10Gbps, but get considerably slower sustained read/write speeds on the M1 compared to the same drive on an Intel Mac (c. 700MBps vs 950MBps read speeds).

This may not be significant to you, but it is useful to know if you are using external disks for applications with high bandwidth requirements (e.g. 4K+ video editing).

Thunderbolt 3 external disks work better, but you pay a premium, and there is a lot of variation in performance, so you really need see real-world results for specific drives.


I would like to add info on the Buffalo USB-C SSDs I was referring.

In June the company prepared another firmware. Those drives have two version of firmware, the normal and the Apple Silicon. There is a utility for M1 macs to change between those versions. This utility does not work on Intel macs.

After changing the firmware, it works, but the results are abysmal.
The 1.9T drive performance is about reading 300 GB/s, writing 200-300GB/s.
The 960GB drive is reading 200-300 GB/s, writing... about 30GB/s. Thirty, is is not a mistake.

My guess is the M1 firmware cripples drive so it does not drain too much power.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.