kwandrews, are you the same guy benching his MBP 2016 at 5am in the morning on Geekbench 4?
I was going through the site and found some interesting results. Here is my rough and approximate distillation between my present system and rMB 2016 as well as rMBP 2016 13".
CPU
My Late 2011 MBP 15 has about 33xx or 36xx Single Core performance, 9xxx multi core.
rMB 2016 m5 is same 3xxx single core but multi core is 3000 less, at 6xxx.
rMBP 2016 is about 38xx single core but multi core is 12000-something averaged.
Graphics
My Late 2011 MBP 15 has a paltry, laughable, downright embarrassing 51xx Compute score, the GPU is Radeon 6770m.
rMB 2016 m5 is 16000-something with Intel 515.
rMBP 2016 13" is 26000-27000-something with Intel 530.
With these figures in hand, it seems to me that if I were to buy an rMB 2016, I would essentially just thin down my big fat 2011, is all. Or am I reading it wrong?
On the other hand, the 13" boasts of definite CPU and Graphics improvements in a similar form factor. And if I am not looking for the thinnest and lightest, I might be doing well to get a 13.
But, frankly, I am quite surprised, as in 5 years the major improvements have happened only in the graphics subset it seems - when compared to my Sandy Bridge i7 2.4GHz in the MBP Late 2011.