My MacBook Pro 15" 2.5 GHz (late 2011), purchased in October 2012 at an Apple authorised reseller, has started to do random reboots and demonstrate odd video behaviour which is the classic symptoms of the known graphics card failure of these particular macs...broken up video and offset screen display, stripey lines etc, I've had them all recently.
I learned about the extended program of repair, but then also learned that it had just ended in Dec 2016. I took it into the Apple Store last week and they had it in for tests. Yesterday they phoned and said the fault was not the graphics card and so they would not cover the repair. They said the logic board needed replacement and it would cost me £525 to repair. When I asked what they had done in tests, they said under and EFI test the issue had manifested itself and this did not use the graphics card, hence I was not covered under the extended plan.
They blamed the issue on the fact that the authorised reseller had fitted 16Gb of ram when the machine only officially supports 8Gb. Therefore it was not their fault.
Why do I feel as though I am being fobbed off here? The chap reporting all this to me gave me a pretty garbled account of the tests and I feel they are conveniently blaming the re-seller to get out of paying for the repair.
Should I believe Apple?
Thanks for your help.
Curlydog
I learned about the extended program of repair, but then also learned that it had just ended in Dec 2016. I took it into the Apple Store last week and they had it in for tests. Yesterday they phoned and said the fault was not the graphics card and so they would not cover the repair. They said the logic board needed replacement and it would cost me £525 to repair. When I asked what they had done in tests, they said under and EFI test the issue had manifested itself and this did not use the graphics card, hence I was not covered under the extended plan.
They blamed the issue on the fact that the authorised reseller had fitted 16Gb of ram when the machine only officially supports 8Gb. Therefore it was not their fault.
Why do I feel as though I am being fobbed off here? The chap reporting all this to me gave me a pretty garbled account of the tests and I feel they are conveniently blaming the re-seller to get out of paying for the repair.
Should I believe Apple?
Thanks for your help.
Curlydog