Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Super Spartan

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Mar 10, 2018
630
272
Dubai
Here are my MacBook Pro 16 Benchmarks (i9-9980HK/Radeon Pro 5500M 8GB/4TB SSD):

uoAiSbx.png


Lvn7laq.png


u90JHLP.png


eWLsqVc.png



HyTgFO0.png


aN1rmNb.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pb01890

Maurizio Marra

macrumors newbie
Jan 4, 2020
7
6
Nice performance, indeed!
And this is mine, with less ram, lower specs processor, smaller ssd, lower specs GPU, 2500 € less in Europe, not so bad... :):
MacBook Pro 16 | Intel i9-9980H @ 4,8 GHz | 16 GB 2666 MHz DDR4 RAM | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M 4 GB | 1 TB Apple SSD:

Schermata 2020-01-08 alle 15.03.25.png


DiskSpeedTest.png

Schermata 2020-01-08 alle 15.13.32.png



Schermata 2020-01-08 alle 15.14.48.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super Spartan

Super Spartan

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Mar 10, 2018
630
272
Dubai
Nice performance, indeed!
And this is mine, with less ram, lower specs processor, smaller ssd, lower specs GPU, 2500 € less in Europe, not so bad... :):
MacBook Pro 16 | Intel i9-9980H @ 4,8 GHz | 16 GB 2666 MHz DDR4 RAM | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M 4 GB | 1 TB Apple SSD:

View attachment 887484

View attachment 887485
View attachment 887486


View attachment 887487
Awesome man! How come your SSD is much faster than my 4TB? I thought the bigger the SSD the more performance it is supposed to have.

Just got another benchmarking tool called AmorphousDiskMark (looks like a clone of the Windows CrystalDiskMark) and ATTO Disk Benchmark

aN1rmNb.png


HyTgFO0.png

[automerge]1578516661[/automerge]
Your CPU score is the same as my i9-9980HK!! Impressive!
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.