hello guys
so im just about to hop over from windows to Mac for productivity reasons [windows just kept lagging and stuttering and driving up the fans like crazy for idle/low use apps]
mostly photo editing with some 4K video editing on davinci resolve and FCP[I use Nikon cameras with N-RAW format and Possibly ProRes RAW/422 HQ].
initially I was saving up and eyeing on the M2 Ultra Mac Studio because it's perfect for my needs
However seeing the M3 Max from some reviewers running similar benchmarks showing the M3 Max is faster and much more snappier now prompted me this debate.
Money wise I am putting a lot into my first Mac as I tend to ride my products to death and aren't ultra insecure in chasing always the next big thing. by to death I mean around at least 5 years [if not more is even better]
have these options
14 inch MBP m3 max 16c 40g 48 or 64gb ram with 1tb ssd
16 inch MBP m3 max 16c 40g 48 or 64gb ram with 1tb ssd
base M2 Ultra Mac Studio 64gb ram, 1tb ssd, 24c 60Gpu
for context I do have monitors [4k 60hz and 1440p 165hz] which can link via HDMI and keyboards/mouse which can bluetooth/pair to both types of Macs.
given the above scenario which would you prefer.
I am aware the 14" is much more portable and easier to lug vs the 16"
and obvs the 14" will throttle/heat up quicker in comparison to the 16" which has more cooling/room to play with at the expense of convenience of portability.
and the Mac Studio is tempting too because it has more ports than I'll ever need and can sit on top of my desk being tiny and light [my PC is a ridiculously oversized noisy fan junkie that still lags against apple silicon. plus with the edge of being ultra cool thanks to a large cooling system with fans never ramping high... is kinda insane given the power inside [idk why windows pcs enjoy driving up the fans too much in idle and basic mode it was pissing me off after many years of tolerating it] not to mention its a tiny box like 10-15x smaller than my current pc whilst holding so much potential in that chip
any input appreciated based on performance for above two main productivity tasks, if I have to spend more so be it. I for once don't think I'll need 96/128GB ram nor 2/4/8TB ssd. I have external USB-C drives that work fine via usb-c to usb-c cable as external storage when at home or on the go [its a 4TB external ssd]
also would I be fine with 48gb or should I just plunge the extra for 64gb lol [to match up against M2 Ultra Mac Studio to even out the comparison... god
buying a Mac is so difficult; when apple is literally surpassing itself over the ultra in a matter of half a year... had the m3 max never been released so quick id settle for a M2 Ultra but now there's so many options avail aahaha
so im just about to hop over from windows to Mac for productivity reasons [windows just kept lagging and stuttering and driving up the fans like crazy for idle/low use apps]
mostly photo editing with some 4K video editing on davinci resolve and FCP[I use Nikon cameras with N-RAW format and Possibly ProRes RAW/422 HQ].
initially I was saving up and eyeing on the M2 Ultra Mac Studio because it's perfect for my needs
However seeing the M3 Max from some reviewers running similar benchmarks showing the M3 Max is faster and much more snappier now prompted me this debate.
Money wise I am putting a lot into my first Mac as I tend to ride my products to death and aren't ultra insecure in chasing always the next big thing. by to death I mean around at least 5 years [if not more is even better]
have these options
14 inch MBP m3 max 16c 40g 48 or 64gb ram with 1tb ssd
16 inch MBP m3 max 16c 40g 48 or 64gb ram with 1tb ssd
base M2 Ultra Mac Studio 64gb ram, 1tb ssd, 24c 60Gpu
for context I do have monitors [4k 60hz and 1440p 165hz] which can link via HDMI and keyboards/mouse which can bluetooth/pair to both types of Macs.
given the above scenario which would you prefer.
I am aware the 14" is much more portable and easier to lug vs the 16"
and obvs the 14" will throttle/heat up quicker in comparison to the 16" which has more cooling/room to play with at the expense of convenience of portability.
and the Mac Studio is tempting too because it has more ports than I'll ever need and can sit on top of my desk being tiny and light [my PC is a ridiculously oversized noisy fan junkie that still lags against apple silicon. plus with the edge of being ultra cool thanks to a large cooling system with fans never ramping high... is kinda insane given the power inside [idk why windows pcs enjoy driving up the fans too much in idle and basic mode it was pissing me off after many years of tolerating it] not to mention its a tiny box like 10-15x smaller than my current pc whilst holding so much potential in that chip
any input appreciated based on performance for above two main productivity tasks, if I have to spend more so be it. I for once don't think I'll need 96/128GB ram nor 2/4/8TB ssd. I have external USB-C drives that work fine via usb-c to usb-c cable as external storage when at home or on the go [its a 4TB external ssd]
also would I be fine with 48gb or should I just plunge the extra for 64gb lol [to match up against M2 Ultra Mac Studio to even out the comparison... god
buying a Mac is so difficult; when apple is literally surpassing itself over the ultra in a matter of half a year... had the m3 max never been released so quick id settle for a M2 Ultra but now there's so many options avail aahaha