What gets me the most bang for my buck - upgrading to a SSD or upgrading RAM?
Slowness I'm seeing is with iPhoto - I'm thinking the bottleneck is the iPhoto library HD (800 GB of pix).
- c
What gets me the most bang for my buck - upgrading to a SSD or upgrading RAM?
Slowness I'm seeing is with iPhoto - I'm thinking the bottleneck is the iPhoto library HD (800 GB of pix).
- c
well buying a 1tb ssd would work but they cost a lot.
I would not buy 2 new intel 600gb ssds and raid0 them into a 1.2tb hdd with the 800gb iPhoto album.
I would max ram first.
I would then consider using 1 pair of 1tb samsungs in a raid0 of 2tb and putting the iphoto on it. but you must have a backup system if you do that. not just Time machine.
4 drives:
320 Gig WD Raptor (10,000 rpm) as system drive
1 Tb (7200 rpm) for iPhoto
1 Tb (7200 rpm) for iTunes/video
other external HD for backups, etc...
Have 5 of RAM in there now (2-2-1-0).
So was initially looking to upgrade RAM, but then thought maybe SSD could be more bang for the buck. But if my bottleneck is the iPhoto drive I think simply upgrading my system drive to SSD might not get me as far...
Well, I have to use paired RAM, right? That's my only option...
The next question: Is there a difference performance-wise, between adding, say, 2 x 4GB or 4 x 2 GB? As I understand it, tri-channel only applies to the later Mac Pros...