Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

c23roo

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 29, 2004
148
0
What gets me the most bang for my buck - upgrading to a SSD or upgrading RAM?
Slowness I'm seeing is with iPhoto - I'm thinking the bottleneck is the iPhoto library HD (800 GB of pix).
- c
 
What gets me the most bang for my buck - upgrading to a SSD or upgrading RAM?
Slowness I'm seeing is with iPhoto - I'm thinking the bottleneck is the iPhoto library HD (800 GB of pix).
- c

Depends entirely on what drive you have now and how much RAM you have now.
 
well buying a 1tb ssd would work but they cost a lot.


I would not buy 2 new intel 600gb ssds and raid0 them into a 1.2tb hdd with the 800gb iPhoto album.


I would max ram first.


I would then consider using 1 pair of 1tb samsungs in a raid0 of 2tb and putting the iphoto on it. but you must have a backup system if you do that. not just Time machine.


these make a fast raid0 :



http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152185&Tpk=samsung 1tb f3
 
4 drives:
320 Gig WD Raptor (10,000 rpm) as system drive
1 Tb (7200 rpm) for iPhoto
1 Tb (7200 rpm) for iTunes/video

other external HD for backups, etc...

Have 5 of RAM in there now (2-2-1-0).

So was initially looking to upgrade RAM, but then thought maybe SSD could be more bang for the buck. But if my bottleneck is the iPhoto drive I think simply upgrading my system drive to SSD might not get me as far...

Thoughts?
 
Well, I have to use paired RAM, right? That's my only option...

The next question: Is there a difference performance-wise, between adding, say, 2 x 4GB or 4 x 2 GB? As I understand it, tri-channel only applies to the later Mac Pros...
 
1957 -

Can I ask why you recommend 2 x 1 TB in RAID instead of simply going out and grabbing a 2TB drive? Cheaper? Faster? Sorry, forgive the ignorance...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.