I have a Canon Rebel and am looking to purchase a macro lens for bugs & flowers and things like that.. I really dont want to spend more than $500. Could anyone recommend a good macro lens in this price range?
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
Canon 100mm 2.8 macro - definitely worth it.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/194451-USA/Canon_4657A006_100mm_f_2_8_USM_Macro.html
Extension tubes and a fast fifty if you don't already have one.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375102-REG/Kenko_AEXTUBEDGC_Auto_Extension_Tube_Set.html
Extension tubes and a fast fifty if you don't already have one.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375102-REG/Kenko_AEXTUBEDGC_Auto_Extension_Tube_Set.html
Im sorry Im new to this... Are you saying use the tubes with my stock lens? or a lens someone here is suggesting?
Im sorry Im new to this... Are you saying use the tubes with my stock lens? or a lens someone here is suggesting?
If you have one of the 1.4 or 1.8 50mms, then with that, otherwise after getting one. As others have said, a macro lens is better for moving subjects, but tubes can be stacked and offer lots of options for a relatively inexpensive price.
I got the 100mm macro a year ago and I couldn't be happier. If you want some examples, check out my gallery, almost all pics were taken with that lens.
Yes, I'm definitely recommending it!
Keep in mind that you'll either need lots of light or a flash to light your subject. I use a Canon ring flash (MR-14EX).
What camera are you using if you don't mind me asking?
Yes, I'm definitely recommending it!
Keep in mind that you'll either need lots of light or a flash to light your subject. I use a Canon ring flash (MR-14EX).
That's independent of focal length. If you need a certain lighting, you may need a flash, simple as that.Isnt the whole idea of the 100mm that you can be farther away? Therefor not needing a flash?
While we are on the subject can someone make the same recommendation for a Nikon D90?
Thanks
zack