Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

xPismo

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Nov 21, 2005
675
0
California.
I saw this and busted out laughing.

CIO Today said:
Biting Back

Some believe the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)... is behind the decision to charge for the software...

"I do not believe SOX has anything to do with it. SOX is about reporting and protecting financial data, not about marketing new features," said a MacRumors.com forum member who goes by the name of "EagerDragon."

Another MacRumors.com member named "Guzhogi" was more vehement: "We're already paying for the feature, but now we have to pay more to use it? Sounds a good way to screw the consumer."

Maybe its just me but why would you quote forum members in your article? Do they even ask for permission? Isn't everything we say property of Macrumors/Arn? I think EagerDragon and Guzhogi just became tech journos! :cool:
 
they should have at least contacted an adminstrator, or arn imo. That was pretty funny, but that guy is right but i know i'll be one of the ones to actually pay the fee, like most out there that have a pre-n router.
 
Maybe its just me but why would you quote forum members in your article?
It's easier than randomly interviewing people in the street to see if any care about this?
Do they even ask for permission?
No need. This is exactly the kind of usage that fair dealing/fair use is there to protect.
 
Rebroadcasting material on these sites sort of cuts both ways when they loosened the rules for this type of stuff.

If we can quote their stories, they can likely quote us in their rags.
 
With all due respect to MR, quoting us is not necessarily good journalism, apart from using the material in the context of consumer reactions/opinions.

You don't even hear much more popular forums getting quoted by news outlets - they prefer blogs, especially considering how silly many of our handles sound in a serious context. ;) :p
 
Granted a quick search could reveal this thread to the author of this article, but maybe the author is a fellow MacRumors user!! :eek:
 
With all due respect to MR, quoting us is not necessarily good journalism, apart from using the material in the context of consumer reactions/opinions.

You don't even hear much more popular forums getting quoted by news outlets - they prefer blogs, especially considering how silly many of our handles sound in a serious context. ;) :p

But you need to find out people's reactions to news regarding an Apple product that very few people know anything about. Where are they going to find numerous people who know about the very latest Apple news and rumours. Standing outside an Apple Store won't work because you're not really going to get the most knowledgeable people answering the question.

In some ways, going to a board like MacRumours is a great decision on their part.
 
With all due respect to MR, quoting us is not necessarily good journalism, apart from using the material in the context of consumer reactions/opinions.
Exactly.

Even people who are grabbed on the street for an opinion offer some pretty stupid "insights" sometimes. Quoting a forum, where anybody can say just about anything, is very poor "journalism".

If they wanted to "quote" people in the aggregate, such as, "Reactions to the iPhone at Macrumors.com forums were highly positive," that's a different story.
 
Exactly.

Even people who are grabbed on the street for an opinion offer some pretty stupid "insights" sometimes. Quoting a forum, where anybody can say just about anything, is very poor "journalism".

If they wanted to "quote" people in the aggregate, such as, "Reactions to the iPhone at Macrumors.com forums were highly positive," that's a different story.

In other news, the iPod is destined to be a colossal failure.

Vox populi is a medical term for what's commonly called "lazy journalist's disease."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.