Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

stoid

macrumors 601
So this means that instead of plugging a DSL modem into the wall and then running that out over ethernet, you'd plug the phone line into the back of your Mac (just like the 80s)?

I suppose that it might be useful for desktop machines, but I like using wireless internet just fine. Now, it the Airport Extreme could have the DSL wire run straight to it, that would be cool!
 

Josh396

macrumors 65816
Oct 16, 2004
1,129
0
Peoria/Chicago, IL
stoid said:
So this means that instead of plugging a DSL modem into the wall and then running that out over ethernet, you'd plug the phone line into the back of your Mac (just like the 80s)?

I suppose that it might be useful for desktop machines, but I like using wireless internet just fine. Now, it the Airport Extreme could have the DSL wire run straight to it, that would be cool!
I agree. I think there's a better chance that we'll see this integrated with the Airport Extreme. Apple really seems set on wireless making it standard on every model of the iMac, iBook, Macbook Pro and high end Mac mini. The thing I never got is why it's not standard on any Powermac. You would think that paying $2,000 would get you wireless when you can buy a $600 mini with it standard.
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
Josh396 said:
The thing I never got is why it's not standard on any Powermac.
If it could be added for zero additional cost to the consumer, I'm sure people would like it. But most pro buyers are going to have PowerMacs on ethernet connections - often gigabit. Not many would tend to use the wireless connectivity, or at least not enough for Apple to justify putting it in by default.

Just my opinion, of course!
 

Le Big Mac

macrumors 68030
Jan 7, 2003
2,840
437
Washington, DC
jsw said:
If it could be added for zero additional cost to the consumer, I'm sure people would like it. But most pro buyers are going to have PowerMacs on ethernet connections - often gigabit. Not many would tend to use the wireless connectivity, or at least not enough for Apple to justify putting it in by default.

Just my opinion, of course!

Yeah, seems to be pretty low value. Of course, the application was five years ago.

But given that lots of high-speed users are on an intranet or cable modem, only a small share would have a use for this anyway. And since technology keeps developing, I imagine that it will become outmoded.
 

FireArse

macrumors 6502a
Oct 29, 2004
900
110
jsw said:
But most pro buyers are going to have PowerMacs on ethernet connections - often gigabit.

Thats what I do.

I see wireless as a convenience. Gb ethernet is a better 'Power' solution. Plus, you can forsee the laptops and the consumer desktops being moved around a bit - but have you picked up a Power G5?!

F
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.