Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We will see his reaction after the Appellate Courts. Anyone who thinks this is over does not understand the US Appellate System and Apple’s ability to navigate it.

The hardware is still in the devices. It’s the App that is disabled.

His shareholders should be pressuring him to negotiate in good faith. His request for $100 per devise in Royalties is ludicrous and immature. Apple would be willing to settle on a reality based figure.

His wish to “Collaborate” is also fiction. Apple is not going to let Masimo use the AW as a Hardware Testbed. Masimo deep down isn’t interested in licensing, they want to be the Sensor Hardware supplier.

Never going to happen.
 
"...there has been no chat with Apple..."

Is that a quote from the CEO MacRumors?
Wouldn't the appropriate words be discussion or negotiation?
How odd.
 
So if they stole your technology does your technology suck?

So is he implying that Masimo's technology sucks? 🤔

I think he is trying to imply that Apple is applying or manipulating the “stolen” Masimo tech incorrectly i.e., Masimo's technology is good, Apple's application of it sucks.
 
Not really. Someone can steal another person's tech and not implement it very well. It sounds like Massimo's monitors are continuous, unlike the Apple Watch. Their products are also FDA approved and used throughout the medical industry, unlike Apple's. It's pretty obvious that whatever Apple is doing with Massimo's tech, Apple's solution hasn't been as thoroughly vetted, so maybe Massimo's CEO is right.
and Apple has been advertising the SpO2 feature as a wellness feature and not to be used for medical purposes ... so there is that, this guy is wrong.
 
"I really feel wholeheartedly that consumers are better off without it."
I can't wait for other newsworthy quotes like "Apple's screens are terrible," from Samsung or "Pepsi just tastes awful" from Coke.

(And yes, I know. The first one may be a little too on the nose here.)
 
Not really. Someone can steal another person's tech and not implement it very well. It sounds like Massimo's monitors are continuous, unlike the Apple Watch. Their products are also FDA approved and used throughout the medical industry, unlike Apple's. It's pretty obvious that whatever Apple is doing with Massimo's tech, Apple's solution hasn't been as thoroughly vetted, so maybe Massimo's CEO is right.
Fair point. I work in healthcare, so definitely familiar with Masimo's tech. I've seen Apple Watch readings compared to O2 sensors. Sometimes their readings are spot on. Sometimes close. Other times...not so much. I would absolutely trust the O2 sensor's reading over the watch's reading, simply for the sake of consistency. But I don't recall Apple ever saying this is the "be all end all" reading. Given that it's not the main purpose of the Apple Watch, I could imagine "perfection" isn't the primary goal.

(Not disputing your point, by the way. Just in case that wasn't clear)! Honestly, this whole thing is a cluster 😂
 
I suppose it's possible that Masimo's CEO is being balanced and fair in his statement (and I don't have a position on who stole what and didn't pay what), but it does came across as very Buford Tannen.
3a0e4cc9-6791-4890-b047-268e7ba15361_text.gif
 
  • Love
Reactions: Clent
and Apple has been advertising the SpO2 feature as a wellness feature and not to be used for medical purposes ... so there is that, this guy is wrong.
So what does that mean exactly? A "wellness feature"? Is that another way of saying "gimmick"? Apple might have ripped off Massimo's tech but still implemented it in a sub-standard way. Bottom line remains, Apple's products aren't FDA approved and, as you pointed out, are marketed as "wellness" devices, which is really quite meaningless. Massimo's products are FDA approved and have been used by the medical industry for decades. So, no, this guy is not wrong.
 
I’m not a fan of poaching people and stealing patents that said IP and patent length should be reviewed. No reason for parents to exist past 10-15 years. Costs would go down for the consumer across all markets…. In terms of the quality of Apples algorithm and oxygen sensor I’m going to agree. I was recently diagnosed with sleep apnea via a sleep study My O2 levels dropped below 60. My Apple Watch has always showed me at 93 or above this not showing any signs of an issue from that stat.
Erm... did the people who sold the the sleep apnea treatment also conduct the sleep study? If so, they have an interest in finding the minimum SpO2 values possible.

In any case, one or the other sensor was wrong, or your Apple Watch doesn't measure this during sleep. Could be a lot of things.
 
So what does that mean exactly? A "wellness feature"? Is that another way of saying "gimmick"? Apple might have ripped off Massimo's tech but still implemented it in a sub-standard way. Bottom line remains, Apple's products aren't FDA approved and, as you pointed out, are marketed as "wellness" devices, which is really quite meaningless. Massimo's products are FDA approved and have been used by the medical industry for decades. So, no, this guy is not wrong.
It mean if you think something is wrong go to a doctor.
 
A lot of people posting in this thread are revealing that they cannot hold two related but ultimately exclusive ideas in their heads. Apple could build a sensor that both violates Masimo’s patent and collects health metrics in an inferior way to the product they ripped off.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.