So if they stole your technology does your technology suck?
If that's true, then Apple takes the Douchiest Company Ever Award for suing Samsung over rounded corners. Every company protects its IP.Masimo seems to be a douchy company. The only thing this lawsuit has done is hurt the end user.
So if they stole your technology does your technology suck?
So is he implying that Masimo's technology sucks? 🤔
and Apple has been advertising the SpO2 feature as a wellness feature and not to be used for medical purposes ... so there is that, this guy is wrong.Not really. Someone can steal another person's tech and not implement it very well. It sounds like Massimo's monitors are continuous, unlike the Apple Watch. Their products are also FDA approved and used throughout the medical industry, unlike Apple's. It's pretty obvious that whatever Apple is doing with Massimo's tech, Apple's solution hasn't been as thoroughly vetted, so maybe Massimo's CEO is right.
I believe they are one of the biggest makers of medical pulse oximeters for hospitals. Will not go out of business.Theyll be out of business in < 2 years.
I can't wait for other newsworthy quotes like "Apple's screens are terrible," from Samsung or "Pepsi just tastes awful" from Coke."I really feel wholeheartedly that consumers are better off without it."
Fair point. I work in healthcare, so definitely familiar with Masimo's tech. I've seen Apple Watch readings compared to O2 sensors. Sometimes their readings are spot on. Sometimes close. Other times...not so much. I would absolutely trust the O2 sensor's reading over the watch's reading, simply for the sake of consistency. But I don't recall Apple ever saying this is the "be all end all" reading. Given that it's not the main purpose of the Apple Watch, I could imagine "perfection" isn't the primary goal.Not really. Someone can steal another person's tech and not implement it very well. It sounds like Massimo's monitors are continuous, unlike the Apple Watch. Their products are also FDA approved and used throughout the medical industry, unlike Apple's. It's pretty obvious that whatever Apple is doing with Massimo's tech, Apple's solution hasn't been as thoroughly vetted, so maybe Massimo's CEO is right.
So what does that mean exactly? A "wellness feature"? Is that another way of saying "gimmick"? Apple might have ripped off Massimo's tech but still implemented it in a sub-standard way. Bottom line remains, Apple's products aren't FDA approved and, as you pointed out, are marketed as "wellness" devices, which is really quite meaningless. Massimo's products are FDA approved and have been used by the medical industry for decades. So, no, this guy is not wrong.and Apple has been advertising the SpO2 feature as a wellness feature and not to be used for medical purposes ... so there is that, this guy is wrong.
Erm... did the people who sold the the sleep apnea treatment also conduct the sleep study? If so, they have an interest in finding the minimum SpO2 values possible.I’m not a fan of poaching people and stealing patents that said IP and patent length should be reviewed. No reason for parents to exist past 10-15 years. Costs would go down for the consumer across all markets…. In terms of the quality of Apples algorithm and oxygen sensor I’m going to agree. I was recently diagnosed with sleep apnea via a sleep study My O2 levels dropped below 60. My Apple Watch has always showed me at 93 or above this not showing any signs of an issue from that stat.
Or Apple did their own thing, but Masimo's CEO is butt hurt about them hiring away some of their employees.I think he is trying to imply that Apple is applying or manipulating the “stolen” Masimo tech incorrectly i.e., Masimo's technology is good, Apple's application of it sucks.
Yeah they definitely aren't going anywhere anytime soon, that's for sure.I believe they are one of the biggest makers of medical pulse oximeters for hospitals. Will not go out of business.
Your SpO2 will improve with aerobic exercise for instance if you are very out of shape..So what does that mean exactly? A "wellness feature"? ...
It mean if you think something is wrong go to a doctor.So what does that mean exactly? A "wellness feature"? Is that another way of saying "gimmick"? Apple might have ripped off Massimo's tech but still implemented it in a sub-standard way. Bottom line remains, Apple's products aren't FDA approved and, as you pointed out, are marketed as "wellness" devices, which is really quite meaningless. Massimo's products are FDA approved and have been used by the medical industry for decades. So, no, this guy is not wrong.
I've only seen 97-98-99 from mine, which I suppose is good... assuming it's accurate which this CEO says it's not 🤷🏻♂️
Just anectdotal, but when I got covid the first time around and it was hitting me hard, i was monitoring my blood oxygen on the watch just out of curiosity. When I finally went to hopsital the readings were bang on.
And do you need a gimmicky "wellness" feature to tell you that?It mean if you think something is wrong go to a doctor.
You hit the nail on the head!A lot of people posting in this thread are revealing that they cannot hold two related but ultimately exclusive ideas in their heads. Apple could build a sensor that both violates Masimo’s patent and collects health metrics in an inferior way to the product they ripped off.