No. Not hard to understand. Just because you steal someone's idea/tech doesn't mean you implement it as well as they do.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Masimo CEO: Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Sensor is Not Reliable, Customers Are 'Better Off Without It'
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
True, but FDA approval isn't even an option for noninvasive/low-risk devices like the Apple Watch so it's kinda an irrelevant distinction.
So they stole your tech, and so it’s not any good. Or it’s not good compared to yours, meaning they didn’t steal it. Like that seems like a public admittance.
You'll have to ask Apple why they think these features are useful to their customers. But I surmise that lots of people who are interested in tools to help them live healthy lives find it valuable. For instance, I like the pulse and calorie measurements when I am exercising, but I don't need them to be highly accurate because I am really just interested in trends and patterns.
If Apple's technology is so bad, according to Masimo, then why does Masimo consider Apple a threat?
If Apple stole Masimo's technology, and Apple's technology is unreliable, then by inference Masimo's technology must be unreliable.
If I want a continuous blood O2 monitor I would get Masimo. Except, uh, I can't buy the Masimo watch. Not on their website, not on Amazon. No one knows if Masimo's technology works as no one can buy the watch. Maybe their technology is so bad, in a wearable device, that Masimo is unable to sell the product.
The continuous monitoring must be a significant drain on the battery in a wearable device. Keeping those LEDs lit, and monitoring the response takes power. The battery life on the Masimo product must be measured watching the minute hand rather than the hour hand.
So here is a plan from Masimo. The technology is so unreliable, we won't sell the technology in a wearable device. But we must also stop Apple from selling a wearable device that we have stated is unreliable because we don't want people to know our technology is unreliable.
If Apple stole Masimo's technology, and Apple's technology is unreliable, then by inference Masimo's technology must be unreliable.
If I want a continuous blood O2 monitor I would get Masimo. Except, uh, I can't buy the Masimo watch. Not on their website, not on Amazon. No one knows if Masimo's technology works as no one can buy the watch. Maybe their technology is so bad, in a wearable device, that Masimo is unable to sell the product.
The continuous monitoring must be a significant drain on the battery in a wearable device. Keeping those LEDs lit, and monitoring the response takes power. The battery life on the Masimo product must be measured watching the minute hand rather than the hour hand.
So here is a plan from Masimo. The technology is so unreliable, we won't sell the technology in a wearable device. But we must also stop Apple from selling a wearable device that we have stated is unreliable because we don't want people to know our technology is unreliable.
That’s a fair point. But blood oxygen levels don’t trend. They should be close to 100% for healthy people.
I don’t know why so many people here have trouble understanding this. Massimo’s technology is medical grade. Apple’s implementation of the technology, which Massimo patented, is not. It’s not hard to understand.
Couldn't we ask the same thing of Apple and their ridiculous "rounded corners" lawsuits against Samsung?
I mean, after all, if Android is such crap, why sue over something as petty as rounded corners? At least Massimo is suing over actual technology they claim to have developed versus something as absurd as rounded corners on a consumer product, something Apple most definitely did NOT do first.
The company has been around since 1989, and has many patents in this area. They are specialized in blood oxygen devices. They are the exact opposite of a patent troll. Fanboy.
Even if Apple's implementation is 100% correct, it is likely that Masimo's CEO would be saying these things to promote their own watch.
Before Samsung was copying Apple's designs, they were copying designs from BlackBerry, Motorola, and others.
Yes, we could. Along with dozens of other patent infringement cases. Some of the patents the have been approved are ridiculous. Things along the lines of "a method to transfer data between devices". Vague and in some cases completely obvious.
I don’t know about the specific patents that they are defending, but I am sure that they have hundred if not thousands of patents that they have developed over the years. There’s not just one. They have clearly refined this technology, because they are one of the leaders in this field.
And lot of the new ones have already been tossed and Apple is down to a couple that most likely will also go.
I don’t pay any attention to the blood oxygen reading because I figure it’s not very accurate.
Not sure what point you are trying to make regarding your sleep apnea results. As has been stated, the O2 tech on the AW is NOT continuous, you have to physically initiate a reading. I dont think you are doing that while sleeping. Likewise, sleep apnea does not have a bearing on your O2 readings when awake. Apple has never claimed to be able to monitor sleep apnea for those reasons. I have sleep apnea as well. I do wear a continuous monitor and its results track well with my Apple Watch. Apple has never represented the AW as a medical device, it's for information only, but I find it reasonable accurate (admittedly I take multiple readings and average them and I dont demand perfection).
If the readings are low then it might be an indication of a problem that needs medical attention. It doesn't need to be very reliable to do that minimal level of monitoring. Masimo says it is unreliable because it is not continuous, but continuous monitoring would just eat up the battery unnecessarily.
It's a watch first and foremost. To tell time. Everything else it does is a nice-to-have feature but there are better tools for all of those features. I don't bother trying to use the watch for email, but it is useful to quickly scan incoming messages without picking up my phone or going to my PC.