Popular myth has been 48GB.
Problem with "Copy & Paste" knowledge, it often isn't very knowledgeable.
3 @ 16GB and 1 @ 8 GB gives you 56GB.
Still waiting for working 32GB modules for these.
Someone needs to make this post outdated.
Am I missing something?
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/18784000/
Am I missing something?
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/18784000/
Ah.. I am quite sure the 4th slot in the single CPU 2009 Mac Pro is actually OK for another 16G of RAM, make it 64G max at this moment, but just not optimum for performance.
The W/X refers to the TDP of the chip not the QPI. The 5 or 3 is what you need to look at.
Not really, the Alpha Designations mean:
E = Enterprise
W = Workstation
X = Extra or High Speed
At least that's what it meant for the 35xx and 55xx series.
For the 36xx and 56xx, Intel seems to have abandoned the W designation of the 56xx series, leaving it for the 56xx series use only.
Lou
It is not however an indicator of dual vs single CPU.
I agree, I never said it was a single/dual indicator. The single/dual indicator is the lead numeric either a 3 or 5. However, Dual CPU chips can be used in single CPU applications, not visa versa.
Lou
Oh I see. Well then if I gain an extra 8GB at the expense of overall performance, I'd rather stick with 48GB in triple channel. Thanks for your help!
Can I ask what do you do, where you'd actually need those extra 8 gb of ram -- where 48gb isn't quite cutting it?
edit: I just realized how seemingly rude my comment seems lol. I don't mean any offense by it, I just am curious. I would like to expand my ram also, but im stuck at 24gb with 3x8 chips