Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

nik911sc

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 12, 2006
35
0
I have been waiting patiently to buy an Air but the specs just appear to be too light on. I admit its to be a portable unit mostly for email and documents etc but I feel that at 2gb RAM just wont cut it for OS X and have been holding out for a 4gb model.

In the meanwhile I thought I would ask those with an Air if they have found the RAM limitation slows them down and if it is a major issue in particular since Snow Leopard was released.

I am on my Mac Pro now with nothing major running and it already has 3gb used.
 

gr8tfly

macrumors 603
Oct 29, 2006
5,333
99
~119W 34N
No problems here on our rev. A running SL.

Almost zero pageouts over 5 days use. Running Pages, Mail, Safari, Word X (yep, Office X), iChat and iTunes. (136154(0) pageins, 42(0) pageouts)

When you see "used" that usually includes RAM in the inactive state. That's available RAM for the previous or new app. It's the ratio of pageins vs pageouts you want to look at for physical RAM requirements.
 

NikFinn

macrumors 6502a
Jun 22, 2009
646
0
MA
I have been waiting patiently to buy an Air but the specs just appear to be too light on. I admit its to be a portable unit mostly for email and documents etc but I feel that at 2gb RAM just wont cut it for OS X and have been holding out for a 4gb model.

In the meanwhile I thought I would ask those with an Air if they have found the RAM limitation slows them down and if it is a major issue in particular since Snow Leopard was released.

I am on my Mac Pro now with nothing major running and it already has 3gb used.
Oddly enough, I was wondering the same thing. (double weird, my name's Nik too.)
 

adamjackson

macrumors 68020
Jul 9, 2008
2,340
4,743
Yeah those are two different things.

Here's my current usage on my MacBook Pro w/ 4Gbs of ram. i'm running a ton of apps too.

http://grab.by/76v


The MBA I have is great! I used it daily and it's an awesome computer for most things.
 

1rottenapple

macrumors 601
Apr 21, 2004
4,758
2,774
Only when I am running three screens of flash, or one flash screen running on the 24 inch external monitor do I experience slowness. NOt sure if it is a ram issue or the 1.86 ghz, but everything else, my rev b with ssd works well.
 

jimboutilier

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2008
647
42
Denver
I have been waiting patiently to buy an Air but the specs just appear to be too light on. I admit its to be a portable unit mostly for email and documents etc but I feel that at 2gb RAM just wont cut it for OS X and have been holding out for a 4gb model.

In the meanwhile I thought I would ask those with an Air if they have found the RAM limitation slows them down and if it is a major issue in particular since Snow Leopard was released.

I am on my Mac Pro now with nothing major running and it already has 3gb used.

I used a RevA MBA 1.6/2/80 traveling on business for about a year. For mainstream business apps (running 10-20 apps at a time) 2gb ram was just fine. It should not be an issue for any of the thing you mentioned. But if you run virtual machines or memory intensive multimedia apps like photo and video editors you may want to hold out for 4gb.

I did an experiment on a MB once with 1gb, 2gb, 3gb, 4gb. I found 1gb ran fine but did not feel snappy. 2gb offered a considerable performance improvement and things really felt fast. 3gb offered a very slight performance improvement but I found I did not reach into the 3gb range much except when running VM's. 4gb seemed to have no noticeable performance increase but I got a fair bump in battery life.

I ended up going back to a MB 2.4/4/320 as the MBA just did not have the storage capacity I needed and running VM's was possible but not optimal. When Apple releases a MBA 2.x/4/256 I will be heading back that way though.
 

ayeying

macrumors 601
Dec 5, 2007
4,547
13
Yay Area, CA
What about when running VMware Fusion with Windows? Any limitations there?

If you wanna run 10 VMs at once, yes. Otherwise, one or two won't have too much limitations. I have Vista SP2 Business x64 running constantly in the background. I have 1GB ram dedicated to it and it doesn't slow down my OSX side at all.
 

musicpenguy

macrumors 68000
Oct 29, 2006
1,851
761
Wow - my original Macbook Pro that I got three years ago maxes out at 2GB! - The machine is still a great machine but I have been able to run VMs on it without a problem.
 

1rottenapple

macrumors 601
Apr 21, 2004
4,758
2,774
Yeah I think my slowdown that I posted earlier has more to do with my slower processor than anything compared to the ram. I think having the 2.16 (i think that is the speed) would improve performance but ah well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.