Greetings all,
I recently (two days ago) got in an MBA (1.6/80) to replace a 17" 2.33 MBP that suffered an accident (car ran over it, cracked screen. HD was recovered).
I've been reading the forums and it sounds like some people's MBA's are cooler than others. Mine has been running the fans fairly heavily, and I was wondering if the load/fan speed sounded about right or whether I should take it back in for a replacement (or MBP if irreconcilable).
My typical load is Safari, Mail, iTunes, Parallels (for OneNote), Adium, NetNewsWire, Things, and recently word 2k8 for outlining. Fairly light load.
On the MBP, the fans rarely ran above 2k unless I was doing something fairly cpu intensive (occasional handbrake, etc). I never really pushed it (basically same load as above, occasional videos and youtube etc.
On the theory of similar load and high desire for portability, I moved to MBA when forced to replace the old lappy.
The machine is beautiful and amazingly light. The screen reduction was not a problem, contrary to what I feared. However, it seems to be running...hot.
I haven't installed coolbook or any other mods. Just stock settings. I kind of hoped the machine would run properly without having to mod it.
When I run the same load now on the MBA, the fans almost never drop below 3500. If I try to do anything that uses the hard drive (i'm talking downloading a file in safari while playing a tune in itunes) it revs up to ~4400, and can easily go to 6.2k. I've been playing with the configuration a little, so I quit adium and NNW when possible to chill the CPU off.
The CPU is almost never below 130F, with heatsink 1 reading typically ~120. when I tell it to do something, CPU shoots up to 150 or 160F, and heatsink 1 doesn't really increase for a little while, while fans rev up like a jet.
Are my numbers out of whack? Is my load significant? Do I need to take it in to be replaced, or are others finding similar loads generating similar results?
My battery life is correspondingly short - haven't really run it a ton off battery, but 4.5hrs? yeah right - more like 2.5, maybe 3. Are others finding similar results?
Thanks in advance,
asparagus
I recently (two days ago) got in an MBA (1.6/80) to replace a 17" 2.33 MBP that suffered an accident (car ran over it, cracked screen. HD was recovered).
I've been reading the forums and it sounds like some people's MBA's are cooler than others. Mine has been running the fans fairly heavily, and I was wondering if the load/fan speed sounded about right or whether I should take it back in for a replacement (or MBP if irreconcilable).
My typical load is Safari, Mail, iTunes, Parallels (for OneNote), Adium, NetNewsWire, Things, and recently word 2k8 for outlining. Fairly light load.
On the MBP, the fans rarely ran above 2k unless I was doing something fairly cpu intensive (occasional handbrake, etc). I never really pushed it (basically same load as above, occasional videos and youtube etc.
On the theory of similar load and high desire for portability, I moved to MBA when forced to replace the old lappy.
The machine is beautiful and amazingly light. The screen reduction was not a problem, contrary to what I feared. However, it seems to be running...hot.
I haven't installed coolbook or any other mods. Just stock settings. I kind of hoped the machine would run properly without having to mod it.
When I run the same load now on the MBA, the fans almost never drop below 3500. If I try to do anything that uses the hard drive (i'm talking downloading a file in safari while playing a tune in itunes) it revs up to ~4400, and can easily go to 6.2k. I've been playing with the configuration a little, so I quit adium and NNW when possible to chill the CPU off.
The CPU is almost never below 130F, with heatsink 1 reading typically ~120. when I tell it to do something, CPU shoots up to 150 or 160F, and heatsink 1 doesn't really increase for a little while, while fans rev up like a jet.
Are my numbers out of whack? Is my load significant? Do I need to take it in to be replaced, or are others finding similar loads generating similar results?
My battery life is correspondingly short - haven't really run it a ton off battery, but 4.5hrs? yeah right - more like 2.5, maybe 3. Are others finding similar results?
Thanks in advance,
asparagus