Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MrCrouton9597

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 27, 2022
10
2
Which MacBook would have better graphics performance? I would like to game but also photo editing.
 

JahBoolean

Suspended
Jul 14, 2021
552
425
Compare both options on the geekbench database and see for yourself if the delta between the 5500m and the M1 outweighs the 18% performance hit that emulating x86 programs on the new process architecture is worth it.


PS. get the m1 pro and enjoy not getting dead ended in a soon to be obsolete architecture, you won't be playing windows games but the 120hz display is really fine for the few competitive games I play with friends.
 

MrCrouton9597

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 27, 2022
10
2
I'd go with the M1, just cause the new architecture has provided better performance vs comparable Intel. Also, better battery life, not sure if that is a factor for you.
I know cpu performance is better on m1 but I didn’t take into account the architecture. Is it really that bad for intel macs?
 

MrCrouton9597

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 27, 2022
10
2
Compare both options on the geekbench database and see for yourself if the delta between the 5500m and the M1 outweighs the 18% performance hit that emulating x86 programs on the new process architecture is worth it.


PS. get the m1 pro and enjoy not getting dead ended in a soon to be obsolete architecture, you won't be playing windows games but the 120hz display is really fine for the few competitive games I play with friends.
I cannot afford the m1 pro at the moment.
 

jav6454

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2007
22,303
6,264
1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
I know cpu performance is better on m1 but I didn’t take into account the architecture. Is it really that bad for intel macs?
There are several articles out there which compare the Intel (i5, i7 and i9) to the M1 and variants. The end results are always for single threaded performance Intel wins but slightly. For multithreaded performance the M1 leaves Intel way behind the rearview mirror.

Mind you these are synthetic benchmarks. Testing actual applications, those same articles, mention that software that has interaction through Rosetta 2 performs much better (percentage varies on M1-flavour) than on the actual Intel chip. Moreover, software optimized for M1 has huge gains in performance vs equivalent Intel.
 

GumaRodak

macrumors 6502a
Mar 14, 2015
583
362
With intel you can run egpu and that is another story for gaming and photo editing….and you can upgrade the egpu, while on m1 you are frozen … i have been gaming in bootcamp with egpu radeon xt5600…internal cpu temps were like 65-70c degrees, with slight fan noise. Capture One was benefiting too from the egpu….
 

opeter

macrumors 68030
Aug 5, 2007
2,709
1,619
Slovenia
If you can wait, wait at least until WWDC 2022 (sometime in June), maybe at least one MacBook (Air?) gets a refreshment.
 

MrCrouton9597

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 27, 2022
10
2
With intel you can run egpu and that is another story for gaming and photo editing….and you can upgrade the egpu, while on m1 you are frozen … i have been gaming in bootcamp with egpu radeon xt5600…internal cpu temps were like 65-70c degrees, with slight fan noise. Capture One was benefiting too from the egpu….
Yeah I forgot that intel macs can use eGPU. I guess I have made up my mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GumaRodak
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.