Intel stated Merom has started shipping to revenue. Retail product availability expected for the end of the month. So can we expect a new MBP at WWDC?Anyone else waiting for Merom before buying a MBP?
twoodcc said:i'm hoping to see it in the Macbooks as well......i can only hope
meanmusic said:Intel stated Merom has started shipping to revenue. Retail product availability expected for the end of the month. So can we expect a new MBP at WWDC?Anyone else waiting for Merom before buying a MBP?
Most definitely. I need (well not really, but would really like) a new laptop for school (September). I'll stick to my 12" PB until a Merom comes.meanmusic said:...Anyone else waiting for Merom before buying a MBP?
haha I bet someone will put a XEON in one. Really. The Woodcrest LV at 2.3GHz has a TDP of 40w: 5w more than merom, versus 65 for Conroe/Woodcrestexabytes18 said:I want to see the Conroe in the new MacBook Pros.![]()
I'm sure some computer company will dare to put one in a laptop. In fact, I have a laptop with a desktop processor. If you think your little MBPs run hot, hold onto my laptop.
GFLPraxis said:Conroe's thermal output will go fine in an iMac- it takes more power than previous processors that went in there, but when you consider that a 2.16 GHz Conroe is $70 cheaper than a 2 GHz Merom or the current 1.86 GHz Yonah in the iMac, Apple will actually be saving money if they upgrade the power supply and put Conroe in there.
I'm predicting Merom in MBP and Conroe in iMac, along with Woodcrest in PowerMacs. MacBooks and Mac Mini's will remain Yonah, and either get a minor speed bump or price drops once Yonah's price drops (restoring the $999 MacBook and $499 Mac Mini).
Erasmus said:I agree (with a certain amount of hope).
The iMac should definitely get Conroe (should, not neccessarily will). I am sure I am not alone when I say if they need to make the iMac case bigger to house a decent Conroe (and dare I say X1800), then so be it. The benefits of lower cost and higher speeds (Higher bus speed) would easily be worth an extra quater or half inch of thickness.
Here's hoping for Macbook price drops too. I feel confident (not that I am qualified to feel anything but nonchalance on the matter, considering I have no proof in this particularly delightful pudding) that the Macbook will stay Core Duo, not C2D.
Further Lobbying for iMac Ultra. (Tell me when it starts to get annoying)
23" LCD, >2.4 C2D, X1800 512Mb.
http://guides.macrumors.com/MeromSilentwave said:Really?! Link?
If so then I will now change my prediction on Merom MBPs at WWDC to Definite!
A L2 cache is kind of like RAM except right on the CPU. The bigger your L2 cache the better performance you will get out of the CPU. For example my company just bought some server we went with the 3.2 ghz machines with the 4 mb cache vs same priced 3.4 ghz with 2mb cache. The cache can make a decent difference on performance.emoeric said:But why am I waiting? what is L2 cache? I have been building PC's and fixing PC's for 7 years, and have never regarded this information as important. Now Im interested to know considering it is the ONLY noticeable difference in Merom chips to the current MBP chips. so what is L2 cache and why is it important to have a beefier cache?
generik said:Time to clear off my college fees so my credit card will be ready next month..
*weapons free*
emoeric said:But why am I waiting? With a careful side by side comparison of the chips, it appears that the 2.0ghz is still the same, with the exception of a L2 cache of 4mb.
meanmusic said:Anyone else waiting for Merom before buying a MBP?
Erasmus said:Further Lobbying for iMac Ultra. (Tell me when it starts to get annoying)
23" LCD, >2.4 C2D, X1800 512Mb.