Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Blue Velvet

Moderator emeritus
Original poster
Jul 4, 2004
21,929
265
The vault is open

BACK in 2000, Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's chief executive, described a grand vision for the future of health care. One day, he said, everyone would have a secure and private website on the internet on which their doctors could post their “scans, lab results, test results, visit minutes” and the like, and to which the owner could grant certain people access, to view some or all of that information.

His ideas met with guffaws from the old lags of the industry, who have seen many fancy schemes for electronic medical records fall flat. America's health sector is simply too balkanised and too paper-based to stitch together easily in digital form. Google, Intel, Revolution (a firm started by Steve Case, a founder of AOL) and other Silicon Valley firms have all tried to do this, with little success. Even Mr Ballmer conceded back then that he was searching for the “holy grail” of healthcare.

And yet, after years of frustration and furious development work, Microsoft now believes it has realised Mr Ballmer's dream. On Thursday October 4th the software giant unveiled its new health-information product at a big event in Washington, DC. It is called the Health Vault, in keeping with Microsoft's promise to make storing data on the internet just as secure as keeping it in a bank.

Health Vault will store all its customers' health data, ranging from test results to doctors' reports to daily measurements of weight or blood pressure, online. Individuals then have access to those records any time, anywhere, via the internet—a great boon for those who travel a lot. Medical offices and hospitals who sign up for the service could easily send test results in digital form to the vault, and patients could authorise them in turn to have access to various, carefully circumscribed bits of their personal data.

Microsoft also announced that several dozen manufacturers, hospitals and charities have signed up for Health Vault. Big names including the American heart, diabetes and lung associations, the NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, and Omron and Texas Instruments, in addition to various firms devoted to the craze for “wellness”, are all now on board, and are expected to announce products and services shortly.

If the software giant has really found a hacker-proof way of storing records online, then the benefits of Health Vault are clear. But use of the vaults will be free both for the individuals that sign up for them and for the vendors and doctors that provide services based on the information they contain. So how will Microsoft make any money?

Sean Nolan of Microsoft explains that the business model depends on one thing: targeted search. Microsoft is betting that people will use its Health Vault Search to find out about their ailments. This service relies on an approach known as “vertical search” which attempts to provide more relevant results than generalist search engines like Google and Yahoo! by specialising in a particular field. The firm's recent acquisition of Medstory, a vertical-search engine focusing on health care, has given it a boost in this area.

Health Vault's search engine would definitely work better than those of rival sites if it could examine users' health records and past queries, and thus provide the responses that are most relevant to each individual's situation. But in order to attract any users in the first place, Microsoft has promised to enforce strict privacy rules. These, says Mr Nolan, would preclude such data-mining.


http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9928129

Somehow, this doesn't fill me with a great deal of confidence. And what's more, Microsoft are potentially opening up themselves to some incredibly serious litigious action if any of it fails.
 

clevin

macrumors G3
Aug 6, 2006
9,095
1
i don't trust internet for any permanent information storage. just fragile.
 

GFLPraxis

macrumors 604
Mar 17, 2004
7,152
460
This bothers me because it directly competes with the company I work for, but ours can only be accessed from within the network.

Putting this on the internet, with free access seems just...dangerous.
 

CalBoy

macrumors 604
May 21, 2007
7,849
37
yeah i know nobody is.....but we're talking about Microsoft here.....the reason we have viruses
Microsoft is not the reason we have computer viruses; intelligent people with questionable ethics are the reason for that.

Microsoft has been in health care for a long time. They've been making me feel sick for years.
Well done sir!:D
 

Ugg

macrumors 68000
Apr 7, 2003
1,992
16
Penryn
This is the future of health care.

One of the biggest problems emergency rooms face is a lack of knowledge about a patient's medical history. A lot of unnecessary and expensive tests could be eliminated if there was a nationwide network like this.

Unfortunately, given the current administration's lack of concern about privacy, the insurance industry's use of medical history to deny insurance and many employers who base their hiring on medical history, it's bad news for the average American.

The only way it will work is if non-medical access of online records is criminalized to a degree that makes it not worthwhile.

Sad that such useful medical technology won't see the light of day until stricter laws are in place.
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Jul 11, 2003
27,397
12,521
Had Apple introduced this, this thread would be filled with people touting Jobs discovery of the fountain of youth or similar. Yeah, Microsoft is an easy target but the concept is a good one with many hurdles to overcome. Kudos to them for getting the ball rolling.
 

j26

macrumors 68000
Mar 30, 2005
1,754
726
Paddyland
....

Unfortunately, given the current administration's lack of concern about privacy, the insurance industry's use of medical history to deny insurance and many employers who base their hiring on medical history, it's bad news for the average American.

The only way it will work is if non-medical access of online records is criminalized to a degree that makes it not worthwhile.

It's not just that - employers and insurance companies can just demand access. Considering you can just give them access easily, it will just be added in to the application/proposal that you consent to their unhindered access to your files.
Criminalising unauthorised access won't be the problem.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.