Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ApplePu

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 3, 2010
149
30
Switzerland
I just began to ask about this in my other thread, sorry for that.

What I need is fast help because I need to decide in the next few hours....

First I wanted to upgrade my new mac mini with a Momentus XT but now I'm thinking about getting a "real" ssd + a FW800 drive for storage to have the huge speed boost of the ssd drive.

Does anybody have this combination in his mini? What I want to know:

How is the performance like of the external drive connected to FW800? Is it comparable to a standard internal hard drive?

Which way would you go?

Thanks for your fast hints!
 
My understanding is that the only external hard drive interface that is comparable to an internal SATA drive is eSATA, which unfortunately isn't available on most Macs.
 
My understanding is that the only external hard drive interface that is comparable to an internal SATA drive is eSATA, which unfortunately isn't available on most Macs.

So that means that the performance of such an external drive for large file size image editing etc. is let's say not so nice?
 
So that means that the performance of such an external drive for large file size image editing etc. is let's say not so nice?

I don't have a mini or a Firewire hard drive for that matter so I could be off on my information. That said, Firewire 800 is the fastest interface for an external hard drive on most Macs. If the drive is a 7200 RPM drive it MAY be faster than a stock internal 5400 RPM Mac mini drive, but I believe it will be slower than if the mini had a 7200 RPM drive installed in it. I believe that Wikipedia has all the stats on the various interfaces if you want to look up what's theoretically possible. Hopefully someone with first hand experience will chime in on this before you make your buying decision.
 
So that means that the performance of such an external drive for large file size image editing etc. is let's say not so nice?

FW800 is somewhere in between a fast internal drive and a USB/FW400 drive. Moving files between my mini's internal drive an an external FW800 (spinning at 5400RPM), I get about 2.5GB of throughput per 15-20 seconds for large files going out, about 3GB/15 sec for files coming in.

YMMV
 
FW800 is somewhere in between a fast internal drive and a USB/FW400 drive. Moving files between my mini's internal drive an an external FW800 (spinning at 5400RPM), I get about 2.5GB of throughput per 15-20 seconds for large files going out, about 3GB/15 sec for files coming in.

YMMV

may i ask which FW drive you use?
 
I'm using a Momentus XT internal and a 7200rpm SATAII drive in a FW800 enclosure. I do use Photoshop CS and Aperture as part of my workflow. I wouldn't consider that combination slow. Is it the fastest thing possible? No. Is it slow? No. It's faster than previous desktops I've built.

To be honest, if you wanted pure speed, you short-changed yourself from Day 1 with the Mac Mini. The starting point should've been an i7 27" iMac (I make my switch to that in January, already have a buyer lined up for my Mini). Work in Photoshop/Aperture/Lightroom tends to be more CPU-bound, not I/O bound. Actually, it's almost never I/O bound unless you're working on large, composited panoramas.

Another storage alternative is a NAS solution that supports iSCSI. OS X and Windows 7 both heart iSCSI.
 
As there was a shipping problem with the ordered Momentus XT I changed my mind and installed now a Crucial C300 SSD. I'm just in the middle of the OS setup procedure, can't wait to see if it was worth it.

I will store part of my data on a FW800 disk in the future. I hope I'll be happy with that solution....

Thanks guys!
 
As there was a shipping problem with the ordered Momentus XT I changed my mind and installed now a Crucial C300 SSD. I'm just in the middle of the OS setup procedure, can't wait to see if it was worth it.

I will store part of my data on a FW800 disk in the future. I hope I'll be happy with that solution....

Thanks guys!

I use FW800 LaCie externals. They have eSATA capability, but I don't use that They are swappable and can be RAIDed easily. I tend to use RAID 1 so if a drive goes, the other one holds my data until I replace the bad one which the LaCie just copies again to the replaced drive.

I do not think it is slow when moving iMovie and vid over to it. Those tend to be large files too.

Sorry ApplePu, I left my comment on the C300 too late for you on your other thread, but enjoy anyway.:cool:
 
Another storage alternative is a NAS solution that supports iSCSI. OS X and Windows 7 both heart iSCSI.

Is that right? I think you need third party software such as globalSAN.

In the Linux world NFS really rocks when used with good servers such as NetApp. I haven't tried to do anything serious with NFS and OS X, and I don't know if any/all major applications (such as Photoshop) would work over NFS.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.