Guys, has anyone noticed that MobileMe (http://www.me.com) is not SSL for email or contacts ? Is anyone concerned by this - I am pretty worried about my emails/contacts being accessible by man in the middle type attacks.
Guys, has anyone noticed that MobileMe (http://www.me.com) is not SSL for email or contacts ? Is anyone concerned by this - I am pretty worried about my emails/contacts being accessible by man in the middle type attacks.
Bleh, I've been whining about this, here, for some time. Welcome to the club.Guys, has anyone noticed that MobileMe (http://www.me.com) is not SSL for email or contacts ? Is anyone concerned by this - I am pretty worried about my emails/contacts being accessible by man in the middle type attacks.
SSL isn't working for me. I have had many intermittent issues with SSL over the last few months, both at home (on 2 computers) and at work. Apple really needs to get their act together.Bleh, I've been whining about this, here, for some time. Welcome to the club.
As far as I can tell, none of the web services are secure, except for the account services. However, it seems that non-web access to MobileMe can be secure. Synchronization (on the PC) appears to be secure, so that takes care of contacts and calendars (assuming, of course, that you've bought Outlook from Apple's competitor). Email access can be secure if you configure your client to use the secure mechanism:
IMAP: port 993, SSLBottom line: if you only need contacts, calendar, and email, avoid the web interfaces, and you can be OK.
SMTP: port 587, TLS
Bleh, I've been whining about this, here, for some time. Welcome to the club.
As far as I can tell, none of the web services are secure, except for the account services. However, it seems that non-web access to MobileMe can be secure. Synchronization (on the PC) appears to be secure, so that takes care of contacts and calendars (assuming, of course, that you've bought Outlook from Apple's competitor). Email access can be secure if you configure your client to use the secure mechanism:
IMAP: port 993, SSLBottom line: if you only need contacts, calendar, and email, avoid the web interfaces, and you can be OK.
SMTP: port 587, TLS
This is pure madness if you are in an unprotected Wifi-spot, omg, and the number of replies here show something even worse: people don't even care...
Uh, as much as I like google, I don't think google's web albums (picasa) supports SSL, either.I have a real problem - I love the photo gallery in mobileme. It's pefect for what I do (family stuff). But, I won't pay one penny without SSL. It's just stupid.
Uh, as much as I like google, I don't think google's web albums (picasa) supports SSL, either.
Google supports SSL for some things, but not others.
Well, the MM web logins do appear to be secure, although everything afterword seems to be unencrypted, except for the account settings. I assume that google's logins are also secure, but I don't know that for a fact (gmail and reader can be secure -- don't know about anything else).For the writing of files, they should (at least the logon process). It's the logon that needs the encryption the most. With mobile me, it doesn't matter if you're logging in for mail or to upload photos...it's one unified logon that should be protected.
Well, the MM web logins do appear to be secure, although everything afterword seems to be unencrypted, except for the account settings. I assume that google's logins are also secure, but I don't know that for a fact (gmail and reader can be secure -- don't know about anything else).
jc1350 said:Well, the MM web logins do appear to be secure, although everything afterword seems to be unencrypted, except for the account settings. I assume that google's logins are also secure, but I don't know that for a fact (gmail and reader can be secure -- don't know about anything else).
You're right...I was too stupid to notice. the logon does use ssl. Well...I'll stop my bitching now. Although I do wish iDisk used encryption for uploads and downloads for the non-public directories.
Well, vista can use https for idisk access, and so I assume that OS X can, too, but I don't know how.You're right...I was too stupid to notice. the logon does use ssl. Well...I'll stop my bitching now. Although I do wish iDisk used encryption for uploads and downloads for the non-public directories.
Well, you can do that, but aren't encrypted zip files pretty insecure, too?How about using Encrypted ZIP files for iDisk backup or shared storage?
Well, you can do that, but aren't encrypted zip files pretty insecure, too?
You're probably better off using truecrypt or gpg.