Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

eyoungren

macrumors Penryn
Original poster
Aug 31, 2011
29,654
28,431
So, yeah, yesterday I thought I'd do this. My MP has no Metal Mesh compatible GPU. But I got Mojave on it, via Parallels. :D

Parallels Desktop.png

2020-07-23 13.52.19.jpg
 
Last edited:

eyoungren

macrumors Penryn
Original poster
Aug 31, 2011
29,654
28,431
There’s a patch that enables Mojave and Catalina to work normally with full acceleration on non-metal GPUs.
Yes, that's true. However, in this particular instance I'd rather get a Metal GPU at some point and then update.
[automerge]1595540667[/automerge]
... which he's using to run Mojave on a 2009 Mini (right?). :)
Yes, the Mini and the 2008 MBP. Neither of which, I truly care if I ever have to do a restore on. However, the MacPro is carrying an installation that originally started in 2004 and has been updated over time. Rather not have to deal with juggling the patcher and my data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1

Amethyst1

macrumors G3
Oct 28, 2015
9,824
12,244
There you go - Mojave on Mavericks :)

mojaveonmavs.png


I couldn't go as far back as Snow Leopard since Fusion 5, 6 and 7 wouldn't boot Mojave from the APFS-formatted disk image. I'll try installing a new copy in these older versions.

Edit: Added APFS incompatibility info.
 
Last edited:

Project Alice

macrumors 68020
Jul 13, 2008
2,092
2,174
Post Falls, ID
Thats funny because i have Mojave running on my Mac Pro 5,1 without any such metal graphics card.. Its not as fast, but it gets the job done.
My 5,1 is lightning. But it's got dual X5680's, an NVMe SSD, 32GB of ram and a Radeon RX 590.
I've got Mojave on a 3,1 too, running on a HDD and it's considerably slower. Modern "macOS" really performs better on SSDs. It really doesn't like running on a spinner. The 3,1 has a metal card in it too, a Geforce GT 730.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1

Amethyst1

macrumors G3
Oct 28, 2015
9,824
12,244
I'll try installing a new copy in these older versions.
No luck in Fusion 5 on Snow Leopard (stop sign; same with High Sierra). Mojave happily installs in Fusion 6 on a Lion host though - until it converts its partition to APFS which Fusion 5/6/7 can't deal with. (Fusion 8.5 can boot from APFS as shown earlier but that requires Mavericks as host.) So I'll have to copy my Mojave installation to a HFS+ volume and tell it to leave that well alone. ;)

Sorry for hijacking your thread @eyoungren - will start a new thread about my experiments with this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: eyoungren

eyoungren

macrumors Penryn
Original poster
Aug 31, 2011
29,654
28,431
No luck in Fusion 5 on Snow Leopard (stop sign; same with High Sierra). Mojave happily installs in Fusion 6 on a Lion host though - until it converts its partition to APFS which Fusion 5/6/7 can't deal with. (Fusion 8.5 can boot from APFS as shown earlier but that requires Mavericks as host.) So I'll have to copy my Mojave installation to a HFS+ volume and tell it to leave that well alone. ;)

Sorry for hijacking your thread @eyoungren - will start a new thread about my experiments with this.
About APFS…when setting this up the other day (High Sierra, Parallels 14) the installer would not allow me to install on the volume that Parallels had created because if was HFS+ Journaled. So, I used Disk Utility (inside the installer) to convert the disk image to APFS. I was shocked it let me do it and I was shocked it succeeded. After that, the install proceeded with no issues.

Just putting that out there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.