I’ll mention it here, I don’t get the hate directed at the
1998 Film from the Godzilla franchise authorities.
I grew up with a Godzilla who trashed cities. I agree that it is an allegory for the evils of nuclear power. Ok, he’d fight other monsters, and according to this article sometimes Godzilla was good and sometimes it was bad.
There are some consistent elements to his character.
screenrant.com
So what was wrong with a big lizard, born of radiation, deciding it needs to migrate to a location to lay some eggs? It was not functioning in an inherently evil manner, yet the evils of nuclear radiation are clearly present, a large mutated lizard/monster.
I’m trying to figure out why the 1998 film got <30% reviews from audience and critiques, it was describes as bloated and slow. It appears in this case, that I’m on the outside, because I’m not tied down/vested in any specific lore, and I was entertained by this story. 🙃
During a nuclear test, the French government inadvertently mutates a lizard nest; years later, a giant lizard makes its way to New York City. Dr. Niko Tatopoulos (Matthew Broderick), an expert on the effects of radiation on animals, is sent by the U.S. government to study the beast. When the...
www.rottentomatoes.com