And, what is your point?
The point isn't about when it split or when Apple splits. The point is that Paul Thurrott is supposed to be one of the top Microsoft pundits and he's THIS far off about the stock. If you read the whole quote he rambles on like he thinks he knows what he's talking about.
And yet he has also made himself an expert in all things Apple and what's wrong with every product. He clearly would have preferred that the Magic Touchpad wasn't released at all, even though many people might find it useful. And he's decided that ANYONE who buys Apple products belongs to this Apple cult that blindly buys anything with the logo.
The point was that he's supposed to write for a reputable publication - or at least one that once was. And yet he spends an inordinate amount of time slamming everything Apple without any kind of explanation. His attacks are juvenile and empty.
My point is that it's sad that these once-strong publications have fallen to resembling a comment thread at Engadget instead of interesting commentary.
Yes, this is a rant, but this guy has gotten on my nerves in a big way.
Yes, this is a rant, but this guy has gotten on my nerves in a big way.
In fact, I want to say they’ve done it at least once in the last twelve months
I think the OP has a point. Paul Thurrot holds himself out as a Microsoft expert; speaks at conferences, writes copious articles, has a large number of Microsoft books out, has 'early access' to products, etc etc.
It's not out of the realms of reasonableness to expect people who hold themselves out as such to actually have a level of truth in what they say. He could easily have qualified it with 'I'm not sure actually', but he didn't.
AppleMatt
http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2010/01/27/apple-drops-an-idud.aspx
That says just about everything about Thurott's "expertise." LOL
The potential of the device was way obvious the second Steve pulled it out.
Again, if you don't like it, don't read it. Complaining here isn't going to help.
I don't think anyone, including Thurrott himself, is claiming he's an Apple expert. Besides, everyone is entitled to their opinion about things, so I fail to see what the fuss is about.
He does have a point about over-the-air syncing. I really wish my iPod would do what others can do.
I think the OP has a point. Paul Thurrot holds himself out as a Microsoft expert; speaks at conferences, writes copious articles, has a large number of Microsoft books out, has 'early access' to products, etc etc.
It's not out of the realms of reasonableness to expect people who hold themselves out as such to actually have a level of truth in what they say. He could easily have qualified it with 'I'm not sure actually', but he didn't.
AppleMatt
Executive summary: Thurrott doesn't know anything about Macs, he doesn't know anything about Microsoft, he writes a lot, many people believe he is an expert, and he has a cult-like following that will defend him no matter what nonsense he writes.
Being an expert with a company's products doesn't make someone a business expert. I work on Cisco and Microsoft stuff all the time, but I really have no idea if their stock split or not because I don't really care. I know generally how both companies have done in the past few years, but I'm not a stock analyst. My stock broker may know stock market trends, but I would bet he doesn't know how to setup an Exchange server.