You are going to get a lot of really good feedback here. I'm going to toss in three thoughts.I want something that I can expand in the future so was looking at the EOS 250D DSLR also the EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens for shooting portrait photos and YouTube videos with a bokeh effect.
Thank You
Hmm... This is a still shot camera. Have you considered a good camcorder for this task? Not saying the still shot camera won’t do the job but I know camcorders are more powerful for video. I know Sony makes a very nice 4K model at $1000. I personally have a Canon camcorder but it can only shoot in HD and not 4K. If I had the ideas it would be perfect for YouTube. Just something to consider. You can do what you wish but if money is not a problem I personally would use a camcorder for YouTube videos.I want something that I can expand in the future so was looking at the EOS 250D DSLR also the EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens for shooting portrait photos and YouTube videos with a bokeh effect.
Thank You
I have to agree here. I've have had SLR/DSLRs for over 50 years now and have multiple lenses for my Nikon cameras; BUT if you are just starting out now, I would highly recommend going Mirrorless. Nikon along with other companies have moved away from the entry level DSLRs and are concentrating on Mirrorless cameras.I would think a mirrorless camera would do better for video, but maybe not.
Minor quibble. Though the 50mm lens on a crop sensor will give the field of view of an 85mm lens on a full frame sensor, the “bokeh” will be the same as a 50mm lens on a full frame sensor. NOT the “bokeh” you would get with an 85mm lens on a full frame sensor.I think a Rebel line camera is perfectly fine for an entry level, starter camera. Changing manual controls won't be as easy as some higher end ones, but many people start out with the Rebel.
I don't think you will get much bokeh on a 24mm; good bokeh needs a longer focal length, on a crop body like the Rebel that would happen around 50mm (which acts like an 85mm). I'd be more inclined to go for a 35mm in your case if you think you have the space to back up that much, which will give you a creamier background than a 24mm will.
On the contrary. Canon has numerous RF lenses. In addition to that, EF, EFS, and M lenses are fully compatible with Canon mirrorless cameras with the use an EF-R lens adapter. I am using all my Canon EF lenses on a Canon R6, and a Tokina SWA lens that has an EF mount. There are two types of RF lenses, one type is comprised of very expensive lenses (wider apertures, and better construction, water-proofing, etc.), and the other a cheaper line of lenses of narrower apertures, and perhaps not as sturdy as the expensive ones).If you have any interest in video, go with a mirrorless model. You can switch between the viewfinder and the rear panel seamlessly. Trying to do video on a dSLR is a painful experience, though it can be done.
Canon's mirrorless system doesn't have many lenses but it is useful, if you want that brand. Any of the brands have good models, but learn about the lenses to see what matches what you want to accomplish, and go with that brand.
I didn't know that 10 was numerous.On the contrary. Canon has numerous RF lenses. In addition to that, EF, EFS, and M lenses are fully compatible with Canon mirrorless cameras with the use an EF-R lens adapter. I am using all my Canon EF lenses on a Canon R6, and a Tokina SWA lens that has an EF mount. There are two types of RF lenses, one type is comprised of very expensive lenses (wider apertures, and better construction, water-proofing, etc.), and the other a cheaper line of lenses of narrower apertures, and perhaps not as sturdy as the expensive ones).
Remember the Sony A7 line began with 3, 35mm f2.8, 55mm f1.8 and 18-70mm so 10 RF lenses at this stage is arguably rapid... lol...I didn't know that 10 was numerous.
what about the Canon EOS M50?I have to agree here. I've have had SLR/DSLRs for over 50 years now and have multiple lenses for my Nikon cameras; BUT if you are just starting out now, I would highly recommend going Mirrorless. Nikon along with other companies have moved away from the entry level DSLRs and are concentrating on Mirrorless cameras.
I'm a Nikon shooter, so am ignorant about Canon. My main point is if you are new to photography and are not invested in any lenses yet, I would recommend going mirrorless vice DSLR because that is where the industry is heading and, as many know, camera bodies come and go, but lenses last a lifetime.... and I believe mirrorless camera lenses and DSLR camera lenses are compatible with any brand.what about the Canon EOS M50?
I find the Canon menu is easy to use IMO but then mirrorless lenses are expensive...can you recommend a Nikon model?I'm a Nikon shooter, so am ignorant about Canon. My main point is if you are new to photography and are not invested in any lenses yet, I would recommend going mirrorless vice DSLR because that is where the industry is heading and, as many know, camera bodies come and go, but lenses last a lifetime.... and I believe mirrorless camera lenses and DSLR camera lenses are compatible with any brand.
The Nikon Z6 is highly regarded for video. If you want something more entry level look at the Z50.I find the Canon menu is easy to use IMO but then mirrorless lenses are expensive...can you recommend a Nikon model?
Thank You
Use a camcorder instead if he can afford one. Was just playing with mine this morning and it’s far more capable and has more features for video than a still camera.The Nikon Z6 is highly regarded for video. If you want something more entry level look at the Z50.
Disagree. For the most part the quality on a consumer camcorder are sub par. The sensor is small and you don't need the features other than raw video. Most of the work will be done in post.Use a camcorder instead if he can afford one. Was just playing with mine this morning and it’s far more capable and has more features for video than a still camera.
I agree with MacNut, in this day and age, unless I were a serious videographer I wouldn't choose a camcorder with a tiny sensor. The OP said he wants bokeh and the youtube look. That requires a full frame sensor and interchangeable lenses.Use a camcorder instead if he can afford one. Was just playing with mine this morning and it’s far more capable and has more features for video than a still camera.
Even if I was a serious videographer I would be spending for a 1-2 inch CCD sensor. I'm not buying a camcorder at Best Buy. Im going to B&H.I agree with MacNut, in this day and age, unless I were a serious videographer I wouldn't choose a camcorder with a tiny sensor. The OP said he wants bokeh and the youtube look. That requires a full frame sensor and interchangeable lenses.
I am looking at the Z50 but can you recommend a lens that I can use for the bokeh effect?The Nikon Z6 is highly regarded for video. If you want something more entry level look at the Z50.
I’d probably consider the 35mm z mount lens. If that it too expensive consider the F mount 35mm 1.8 and the ftz adapter. It might be close to the same cost once you add in the adapter. Not sure the price difference.I am looking at the Z50 but can you recommend a lens that I can use for the bokeh effect?
Thank You