I’ve seen a lot of posts talking about a higher-end M-series chip used in the iMac, 16” MBP, etc. The problem is that most people are calling this the M2 chip, which I think is incredibly unlikely.
The M1, despite its incredible performance, is Apple’s entry level, power-efficient chip. They’ll have other variants for more powerful machines like the iMac, where power draw is less of a concern.
The “M2” chip, as most people are calling it, is probably what will be used in a new iMac and 16” MacBook Pro. I think, however, that it is way more likely that it will be called the M1X. This makes the naming consistent with the A-series processors, and allows them to use the M2 name for the next generation of their entry-level power-efficient chip, which will be the direct successor to the M1.
Think of it like this: the A12 chip was used in the iPhone, and the A12X chip, which was more powerful, was used in the iPad Pro. They didn’t call the 12X the A13, because it wasn’t the direct successor to the A12. It was a more powerful variant of the A12. Thus, the chip used in the 16” MBP and the iMac will almost certainly be the M1X.
—
Here’s how I expect these chips will be used.
Mac mini
M1 for base models, but configurable with an M1X (with a limited number) once it’s released.
MacBook Air
M1 chip only
13” MacBook Pro
M1 chip for entry-level two-port model.
Higher-end configurations can use the M1X chip, but it can’t be configured with the maximum number of cores.
16” MacBook Pro
M1X chip, configurable with up to the maximum number of cores.
iMac
M1X chip. Smaller (24”?) models can’t be configured to the maximum number of cores, but larger (30”?) models can.
iMac Pro
I expect the iMac Pro to be discontinued after the update to the iMacs. Apple may keep it around for a while for those who need an Intel iMac, but other than that I see no place for it in the lineup. It was a stopgap until Apple had the Mac Pro ready, and now that the Mac Pro is here, it’s not needed.
Mac Pro
M1Z chip. This could even be an M2Z, depending on if Apple already has the M2 chips ready by the time they update the Mac Pro with Apple Silicon.
“Mac Pro mini” / “Mac mini Pro”
The rumors about a smaller Mac Pro are intriguing, and if it was released, I would expect it to use an M1Z, potentially with a limit on core count.
—
I expect the M1X will be configurable up to around maybe 10 high performance cores and 6 high efficiency cores in the CPU, and probably around a 12 core GPU at max? That depends on if Apple will use dGPUs in these Macs.
I definitely think that the M1X/M1Z chips will have higher limits on connected displays, RAM, and Thunderbolt ports.
Anyway, those are my thoughts. I’m excited to hear yours.
The M1, despite its incredible performance, is Apple’s entry level, power-efficient chip. They’ll have other variants for more powerful machines like the iMac, where power draw is less of a concern.
The “M2” chip, as most people are calling it, is probably what will be used in a new iMac and 16” MacBook Pro. I think, however, that it is way more likely that it will be called the M1X. This makes the naming consistent with the A-series processors, and allows them to use the M2 name for the next generation of their entry-level power-efficient chip, which will be the direct successor to the M1.
Think of it like this: the A12 chip was used in the iPhone, and the A12X chip, which was more powerful, was used in the iPad Pro. They didn’t call the 12X the A13, because it wasn’t the direct successor to the A12. It was a more powerful variant of the A12. Thus, the chip used in the 16” MBP and the iMac will almost certainly be the M1X.
—
Here’s how I expect these chips will be used.
Mac mini
M1 for base models, but configurable with an M1X (with a limited number) once it’s released.
MacBook Air
M1 chip only
13” MacBook Pro
M1 chip for entry-level two-port model.
Higher-end configurations can use the M1X chip, but it can’t be configured with the maximum number of cores.
16” MacBook Pro
M1X chip, configurable with up to the maximum number of cores.
iMac
M1X chip. Smaller (24”?) models can’t be configured to the maximum number of cores, but larger (30”?) models can.
iMac Pro
I expect the iMac Pro to be discontinued after the update to the iMacs. Apple may keep it around for a while for those who need an Intel iMac, but other than that I see no place for it in the lineup. It was a stopgap until Apple had the Mac Pro ready, and now that the Mac Pro is here, it’s not needed.
Mac Pro
M1Z chip. This could even be an M2Z, depending on if Apple already has the M2 chips ready by the time they update the Mac Pro with Apple Silicon.
“Mac Pro mini” / “Mac mini Pro”
The rumors about a smaller Mac Pro are intriguing, and if it was released, I would expect it to use an M1Z, potentially with a limit on core count.
—
I expect the M1X will be configurable up to around maybe 10 high performance cores and 6 high efficiency cores in the CPU, and probably around a 12 core GPU at max? That depends on if Apple will use dGPUs in these Macs.
I definitely think that the M1X/M1Z chips will have higher limits on connected displays, RAM, and Thunderbolt ports.
Anyway, those are my thoughts. I’m excited to hear yours.