Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Jumpthesnark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Apr 24, 2022
1,242
5,146
California
2020-0629-Nikons_002.jpg


June 29 is National Camera Day, so I decided to start this thread in the hopes that fellow MR members will share a photo or story of a camera that means something to them. Is it your favorite camera? Your first camera? The camera you never leave home without? Was it a gift from someone special? Do you feel like it makes you a better photographer when you use it?

I'll start with this Nikon F3 HP, which has joined me on many adventures. I haven't used it since I switched to digital, but it still holds a special place in my heart because it was the first real pro camera that I bought new (I was in college studying photojournalism, and this camera was the result of summer jobs). This camera recorded countless news and sports events. I have no idea how many rolls of film have gone through this machine, but it was my go-to camera for more than 15 years. I no longer use this Nikon, but it remains my favorite because it allowed me to witness and document so much, and to share those images so other people could have a greater understanding of the world and their community.
 
Last edited:

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,064
50,728
oh, what a fun thread! I don't have photos of all my cameras, but here are some.



1. This was my 30d. It was my first dslr, bought in November 2008. It's the camera i learned to shoot manual on. Prior to this I used a Canon Powershot Pro-1, but no photos of it, and of course plenty of other point and shoot film and digital cameras since I was small.

Web_May_05_2009_001.jpg




2. In May 2009 I upgraded to the Canon 5D Mark II. I really loved this camera hard while I had it, but over time the focusing system failed and it disappointed me. The images from the beginning months were beautiful and had a quality I've never really replicated on my Nikon bodies.

Web_April_30_2009_001.jpg



3. In January 2011, I switched brands to Nikon. To date, this remains my single favorite body ever, and I still have it.

Web_January_18_2011_001.jpg




4. In January 2012 I added the Nikon D800 as a second body to the D700. It was a worthy upgrade, but it never felt quite as right in my hands as the D700, and I used it more because it was better on paper than because I really loved it.

Web_January_24_2014_001.jpg



My current two main bodies now are a Nikon Z6 & Z6ii. I don't actually have photos of either of these. The Z6 rivals the D700 in terms of "favorite" just because it was the first mirrorless and changed the way I shoot. I do use the Z6ii more often now, but the images are nearly identical, and I'd choose the Z6ii because of the focusing system in general.


5. A couple of summers ago, my mom gave me her father's Kodak folding camera that he bought in December 1928 (I think....I have the exact date written down elsewhere). It needs new bellows but I am at a loss as to how to find new ones. The shutter seems to work, and someday I will get this fixed and converted to 120 film so that I can shoot it. My mom has an album of photos my grandad took with this, and I really need to get on with this project so that I can use it before it's too late to share photos with my mom.

Web_August_28_2019_001.jpg



6. In May 2021 I bought a Nikon F100. You may see me refer to images from it as the "broken F100." It had a broken focusing system that confounded even the owner of the camera store where I bought it. He graciously took it back even after the used warranty expired and let me apply the price to a different copy, which has been a joy to use. I don't have a photo of the second copy, but it looks exactly like this one, and actually focuses. 🙂

IMG_1300.JPG



7. In December 2021 I bought a Fujica STX-1 because I wanted the lens that came with it. But the body that came with it works also, and it's a fun little all manual camera.

Web_January_02_2022_001.jpg



8. Earlier this year I bought a half frame camera from Japan. It is super fun, although I've only run one roll through completely so far because it takes forever to shoot twice the number of photos. Looking forward to using it at the beach next week. The meter doesn't work, so I have to use a phone app, and it also leaks a bit of light....but I kind of love it, and it's fun to get vertical images from it.

IMG_3314.jpg
 
Last edited:

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
Oh, indeed, what a fun thread! I didn't rummage back into the far past to find photos of my Nikon D70, D200, D300 and D2x, D2XS and D3, but I know that there are images somewhere in my archives, just as there are of the Nikon SLRs which preceded them and the series of Coolpixes that I enjoyed and used, too, for a while. I loved those Nikon DSLRs, which brought me back into the world of using SLR and through-the-lens photography again with the new digital approach. While the shooting experience felt much the same, there now was no more darkroom, but instead, figuring out the challenges of working with images in the computer.

As it happened, about a year or so ago when cleaning out a closet I ran across my very first introduction to digital photography, the Coolpix 900, which I kept for sentimental reasons, and so before putting her away again snapped a photo:

Coolpix 900.jpeg



Moving forward into more current times, it's a bit easier to find images of my favorites, starting with the Sony RX10 IV, which really got me back into photography after having a bit of a hiatus. I had bought this camera for a specific trip and had the vague idea that maybe I'd use it once in a while around home.....and to my surprise found myself using it more and more and rediscovering the joy of photography as I did so. The MR POTD thread and the RX10 IV by re-igniting the flame within, gently brought me back "home" to something which I've always loved: taking photographs.

One day, fooling around, I did a sort of "glamor" shot of the RX10, but this doesn't really show her assets. I bought this camera in the summer of 2018 and still use her often as a grab-and-run-out-to-the-deck camera to capture some action going on in the lake. This camera will always be a favorite, even though she eventually made it clear to me that I needed to get back to more "serious" cameras, the kind with interchangeable lenses.....

RX10 Glamor Girl.jpeg



Much as I love the RX10 IV there definitely are limitations and there were certain kinds of shots I wasn't able to get. Macro in particular. I could get great closeups but that just isn't the same. I used my Nikon gear and my old Sony NEX-7 occasionally but was getting the itch for something new, current and up-to-date. I was already hooked on Mirrorless, and it was obviously the direction in which camera manufacturers were going, so I quickly dismissed the idea of buying a new Nikon DSLR. The problem was, though, that Nikon at that time didn't have any mirrorless offerings. There were plenty of rumors about something coming eventually. Ehhhh... To make a long story short more than a year had passed between the time I initially started thinking about new gear and the time I actually bought anything, because I wanted to wait to see what Nikon would be offering and also what others were offering, too. The RX10 IV and I spent a lot of time together while I explored where I wanted to go next and with what gear.

The upshot of this was that one day in late November of 2019 I made a trip to one of the local camera shops we have in this area, after having already sent an email with a listing of what I had and the staff there returning a preliminary estimate of trade-in value. I already knew that I needed to go full-tilt with this, rather than trying to run two systems. I'd already seen how much of my gear sat in the bags while I was out running around shooting with the mirrorless NEX-7 or the RX10 IV. I figured, best to just take the plunge all the way, go with ONE current mirrorless system. So, the Nikon gear and the old Sony NEX-7 left the house and didn't come back. Instead, when I walked in the front door a few hours later I had several boxes containing a Sony A7R IV and three lenses. Aieeee!!!!

The first day with the new A7R IV and her three lenses (shot with the RX10 IV, who was somewhat surprised at these new members of the family): camera body plus two macro lenses and a fast mid-tele prime. Today, that A7R IV and the 90mm f/2.8 macro are still a combination that I reach for frequently: they just seem made for each other.

Sony A7RIV and Lenses.jpeg



Time moved on and much as I love the A7R IV, there were times when shooting wildlife that I wished for something just a bit faster, capable of more fps and such in burst mode. I was vaguely beginning to consider adding an A9 or A9 II to the family when Sony announced the A1. Ahhhhh....as soon as I read the description of its functionality and features, I knew that one would be my next camera. Took a while before it came into the household, given its popularity and in the beginning slow availability, not to mention, ahem, the cost as well.

The day finally came when the A1 became a member of the household, and I love, love, love this camera so much! She heads the list when it comes to ranking the favorites, but in reality each camera is a favorite precisely because of its unique features and functions which suit the way that I like to shoot and the situations in which I see photographic possibilities.

The A1 happily posed for photos, including the ubiquitous camera-body-on-box image, shot by her older. sister, the A7R IV.

A1 Out on the Deck for the First Time.jpeg



The A7R IV contentedly stays home these days and mainly shoots macros with her beloved 90mm or maybe a Voigtlander macro lens mounted on her, while the A1 is delighted to be the one to go out-and-about for walks around the neighborhood, usually with her favorite lens, the 100-400mm, mounted. The A1 and the 100-400mm make a great team, especially when we spot Alfred somewhere along the way......

So, yes, through the years I have had a lot of special cameras (starting with the Brownie Hawkeye when I was about eight years old!) and each has earned its own unique place in my heart. What I have now are wonderful cameras but I still cherish the memories of their predecessors, too.
 
Last edited:

Jumpthesnark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Apr 24, 2022
1,242
5,146
California
oh, what a fun thread! I don't have photos of all my cameras, but here are some.



1. This was my 30d. It was my first dslr, bought in November 2008. It's the camera i learned to shoot manual on. Prior to this I used a Canon Powershot Pro-1, but no photos of it, and of course plenty of other point and shoot film and digital cameras since I was small.

View attachment 2024321



2. In May 2009 I upgraded to the Canon 5D Mark II. I really loved this camera hard while I had it, but over time the focusing system failed and it disappointed me. The images from the beginning months were beautiful and had a quality I've never really replicated on my Nikon bodies.

View attachment 2024324



3. In January 2011, I switched brands to Nikon. To date, this remains my single favorite body ever, and I still have it.

View attachment 2024326



4. In January 2012 I added the Nikon D800 as a second body to the D700. It was a worthy upgrade, but it never felt quite as right in my hands as the D700, and I used it more because it was better on paper than because I really loved it.

View attachment 2024327


My current two main bodies now are a Nikon Z6 & Z6ii. I don't actually have photos of either of these. The Z6 rivals the D700 in terms of "favorite" just because it was the first mirrorless and changed the way I shoot. I do use the Z6ii more often now, but the images are nearly identical, and I'd choose the Z6ii because of the focusing system in general.


5. A couple of summers ago, my mom gave me her father's Kodak folding camera that he bought in December 1928 (I think....I have the exact date written down elsewhere). It needs new bellows but I am at a loss as to how to find new ones. The shutter seems to work, and someday I will get this fixed and converted to 120 film so that I can shoot it. My mom has an album of photos my grandad took with this, and I really need to get on with this project so that I can use it before it's too late to share photos with my mom.

View attachment 2024325


6. In May 2021 I bought a Nikon F100. You may see me refer to images from it as the "broken F100." It had a broken focusing system that confounded even the owner of the camera store where I bought it. He graciously took it back even after the used warranty expired and let me apply the price to a different copy, which has been a joy to use. I don't have a photo of the second copy, but it looks exactly like this one, and actually focuses. 🙂

View attachment 2024341


7. In December 2021 I bought a Fujica STX-1 because I wanted the lens that came with it. But the body that came with it works also, and it's a fun little all manual camera.

View attachment 2024328


8. Earlier this year I bought a half frame camera from Japan. It is super fun, although I've only run one roll through completely so far because it takes forever to shoot twice the number of photos. Looking forward to using it at the beach next week. The meter doesn't work, so I have to use a phone app, and it also leaks a bit of light....but I kind of love it, and it's fun to get vertical images from it.

View attachment 2024345

Wow, what a lineup! The Canon 30D was my first DSLR as well. Funny that you went from Canon -> Nikon, and when I went from film to digital, I went the other way, getting Canon gear (the 30D, then some 7Ds, then the 5D MkIIIs, and now 5D MkIVs).

I know what you mean about the 5D MkII focusing system. I borrowed one from a friend once and there was something weird about its focus, moreso with wide lenses than normal or telephoto.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mollyc

Jumpthesnark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Apr 24, 2022
1,242
5,146
California
Oh, what a fun thread! I didn't rummage back into the far past to find photos of my Nikon D70, D200, D300 and D2x, D2XS and D3, but I know that there are images somewhere in my archives, just as there are of the Nikon SLRs which preceded them and the series of Coolpixes that I enjoyed and used, too, for a while. I loved those Nikon DSLRs, which brought me back into the world of using SLR and through-the-lens photography again with the new digital approach. While the shooting experience felt much the same, there now was no more darkroom, but instead, figuring out the challenges of working with images in the computer.

As it happened, about a year or so ago when cleaning out a closet I ran across my very first introduction to digital photography, the Coolpix 900, which I kept for sentimental reasons, and so before putting her away again snapped a photo:

View attachment 2024356


Moving forward into more current times, it's a bit easier to find images of my favorites, starting with the Sony RX10 IV, which really got me back into photography after having a bit of a hiatus. I had bought this camera for a specific trip and had the vague idea that maybe I'd use it once in a while around home.....and to my surprise found myself using it more and more and rediscovering the joy of photography as I did so. The MR POTD thread and the RX10 IV by re-igniting the flame within, gently brought me back "home" to something which I've always loved: taking photographs.

One day, fooling around, I did a sort of "glamor" shot of the RX10, but this doesn't really show her assets. I bought this camera in the summer of 2018 and still use her often as a grab-and-run-out-to-the-deck camera to capture some action going on in the lake. This camera will always be a favorite, even though she eventually made it clear to me that I needed to get back to more "serious" cameras, the kind with interchangeable lenses.....

View attachment 2024357


Much as I love the RX10 IV there definitely are limitations and there were certain kinds of shots I wasn't able to get. Macro in particular. I could get great closeups but that just isn't the same. I used my Nikon gear and my old Sony NEX-7 occasionally but was getting the itch for something new, current and up-to-date. I was already hooked on Mirrorless, and it was obviously the direction in which camera manufacturers were going, so I quickly dismissed the idea of buying a new Nikon DSLR. The problem was, though, that Nikon at that time didn't have any mirrorless offerings. There were plenty of rumors about something coming eventually. Ehhhh... To make a long story short more than a year had passed between the time I initially started thinking about new gear and the time I actually bought anything, because I wanted to wait to see what Nikon would be offering and also what others were offering, too. The RX10 IV and I spent a lot of time together while I explored where I wanted to go next and with what gear.

The upshot of this was that one day in late November of 2019 I made a trip to one of the local camera shops we have in this area, after having already sent an email with a listing of what I had and the staff there returning a preliminary estimate of trade-in value. I already knew that I needed to go full-tilt with this, rather than trying to run two systems. I'd already seen how much of my gear sat in the bags while I was out running around shooting with the mirrorless NEX-7 or the RX10 IV. I figured, best to just take the plunge all the way, go with ONE current mirrorless system. So, the Nikon gear and the old Sony NEX-7 left the house and didn't come back. Instead, when I walked in the front door a few hours later I had several boxes containing a Sony A7R IV and three lenses. Aieeee!!!!

The first day with the new A7R IV and her three lenses (shot with the RX10 IV, who was somewhat surprised at these new members of the family): camera body plus two macro lenses and a fast mid-tele prime. Today, that A7R IV and the 90mm f/2.8 macro are still a combination that I reach for frequently: they just seem made for each other.

View attachment 2024359


Time moved on and much as I love the A7R IV, there were times when shooting wildlife that I wished for something just a bit faster, capable of more fps and such in burst mode. I was vaguely beginning to consider adding an A9 or A9 II to the family when Sony announced the A1. Ahhhhh....as soon as I read the description of its functionality and features, I knew that one would be my next camera. Took a while before it came into the household, given its popularity and in the beginning slow availability, not to mention, ahem, the cost as well.

The day finally came when the A1 became a member of the household, and I love, love, love this camera so much! She heads the list when it comes to ranking the favorites, but in reality each camera is a favorite precisely because of its unique features and functions which suit the way that I like to shoot and the situations in which I see photographic possibilities.

The A1 happily posed for photos, including the ubiquitous camera-body-on-box image, shot by her older. sister, the A7R IV.

View attachment 2024360


The A7R IV happily stays home these days and mainly shoots macros with her beloved 90mm or maybe a Voigtlander macro lens mounted on her, while the A1 is delighted to be the one to go out-and-about for walks around the neighborhood, usually with her favorite lens, the 100-400mm, mounted. The A1 and the 100-400mm make a great team, especially when we spot Alfred somewhere along the way......

So, yes, through the years I have had a lot of special cameras (starting with the Brownie Hawkeye when I was about eight years old!) and each has earned its own unique place in my heart. What I have now are wonderful cameras but I still cherish the memories of their predecessors, too.
That Coolpix is fantastic! As are all the others.

I'm glad you have had such luck with the Sonys. When I wanted to try mirrorless, I bought a Sony Alpha a7II, and though the images are really good, I can't stand the menu system and buttons. It never felt intuitive to me, and it took me out of the moment. As I was trying to find a digital platform for my Leica M lenses, it fell flat. So my whole idea of just having a mirrorless "Leica replacement" that I'd have with me everywhere never panned out. I got a used Fuji X100S instead. And though it doesn't have interchangeable lenses, it feels much better in my hands than the Sony did. I should really sell that camera. It's in great shape and I never use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clix Pix

bunnspecial

macrumors G3
May 3, 2014
8,352
6,495
Kentucky
I should actually be able to set up a proper studio this weekend and I will post photos then, but in the meantime maybe I'll list some significant-to-me ones...

1. The camera that jump started me getting serious about this and made me learn how a camera works-the Canon A-1. I bought that when I was in high school, and used the snot out of it. Of course I have that one too

2. My big upgrade from the A-1 was a Canon T90, Canon's 80s gee-whiz technical camera(and that set the "language" for how their modern cameras work). I sue that one a lot, still have it, and it still feels very natural to me when I used it

3. Canon F-1N-the camera that made me love manual metering and "classic" pro system cameras

4. The beat-to-snot Rolleiflex Automat III(I think) that I bought cheap on Ebay back in 2007, and somehow or another managed to take apart, get working(including the film sensing) and used as my main medium format camera for a long time. I bought a Rolleicord Va along the same time, and while in almost every other way newer Rolleicord was "better", I LOVED that Rolleiflex. I should get it back out and use it again.

5. I had a few DSLRs over the years-a Canon Rebel XS when I first wanted to get my toes wet, then bought a D70 and a D2X when I went to Nikon, but the first DSLR I really clicked with was my D800 when I bought it in 2017. Yes, I still have it, even though the very similar D810 is now my main camera

6. While I was using my Rolleicord, I still lusted after a medium format SLR. I ended up with several, including the Bronica SQ-A which I probably used more than any of them, but I didn't really go all-in until I got my Hasselblad 500C. I LOVE that camera

7. When I just need a big camera and want bigger negatives, it's hard to beat my Pentax 67

8. Finally, how can I forget my Speed Graphic, which I stupidly sold. My only LF camera now is a Calumet monorail, a wonderful camera that I can barely get motivated to use....

9. My first Nikon SLR was actually an F3, and I didn't take to it(and still don't particularly care for it, as much as I try to make myself like it). The first Nikon film SLR I really took to was the F2 Photomic, even though now I grab my F2sb when I want to use an F2. I also LOVE the F4, a camera that seems very polarizing.
 

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
That Coolpix is fantastic! As are all the others.

I'm glad you have had such luck with the Sonys. When I wanted to try mirrorless, I bought a Sony Alpha a7II, and though the images are really good, I can't stand the menu system and buttons. It never felt intuitive to me, and it took me out of the moment. As I was trying to find a digital platform for my Leica M lenses, it fell flat. So my whole idea of just having a mirrorless "Leica replacement" that I'd have with me everywhere never panned out. I got a used Fuji X100S instead. And though it doesn't have interchangeable lenses, it feels much better in my hands than the Sony did. I should really sell that camera. It's in great shape and I never use it.
That Coolpix was a delight, a invitation into a whole new world, even though it was of course a P&S camera. The possibilities inherent in digital photography were apparent immediately. I loved the thing and loved most of its successors until one day I was trying to shoot something and the CP 8800 just was not cooperating. It wasn't acting the way I wanted, it just wasn't as responsive as....DUH!!! A SLR or a DSLR. It was the next day that I went to the camera shop and came home with a Nikon D70, which felt both familiar and yet different....

As for Sony, and moving into that mirrorless FF system, my timing happened to be pretty good, right when Sony was finally coming into its own with its offerings with the A7 III and others. When I first started exploring things in detail, the A7 III definitely caught my interest. By the time over a year later, I was actually ready to make any sort of change, there had been a lot of movement in the offerings that Sony and other manufacturers were promoting.

In my situation it was becoming clear to me that if I chose to go with Sony, this probably would be a matter of totally switching systems and going with native Sony lenses rather than using adapters for lenses from other systems. Then again, I never had a Leica or any Leica lenses so that made the choice much easier for me in the first place. I can understand how, if someone has some of those wonderful Leica lenses, they'd want to keep on using them, even with adapters on camera bodies from other manufacturers.

As for the Sony menu system, yeah, the old one was (and is) a hassle; thankfully with the new menu system that they are using now with the A1 and a couple of their other current cameras, things are much easier and feel more intuitive. I find it frustrating, though, when occasionally, but thankfully rarely, I have to delve into the menu for the older system cameras (RX10 IV, RX100 VII, A7R IV), as I've been nicely spoiled now by the new, current menu in the A1. Whatever my next camera body is, if it's a Sony, which probably it would be, it will definitely be using the new menu and also (hopefully) the same batteries as my A1!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
The digital version of a large format / field camera, eh? Cool looking, and I'll bet it is fun to use, albeit challenging! No bellows? As long as you can buy tilt-and-shift lenses, no problem. Large format shooting can be so frustrating at times, can require a LOT of patience and care in the process, but, ah, so rewarding, the results!
 

r.harris1

macrumors 68020
Feb 20, 2012
2,210
12,757
Denver, Colorado, USA
The digital version of a large format / field camera, eh? Cool looking, and I'll bet it is fun to use, albeit challenging! No bellows? As long as you can buy tilt-and-shift lenses, no problem. Large format shooting can be so frustrating at times, can require a LOT of patience and care in the process, but, ah, so rewarding, the results!
Apparently I mistyped “shift” above as it became a bunch of asterisks :). Indeed, a lot of patience and care is needed. Sometimes I have it, most of the time I don’t. You can also get view cameras with bellows and more movements. Maybe some day. It really is a lot of fun!
 

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
Lo these many, many moons ago I took some photography classes at the local community college. One of them was a one-semester course in Large Format photography. Each student was issued a Calumet field camera for the semester, plus the needed accessories (although of course we had to buy our own sheet film and also enlarging paper to use in the darkroom to print out our results). Everything came in this huge trunk which I could barely fit into my car. I started out the course hating that camera, hating the process, frustrated at the tediousness of lugging the camera, tripod and extra stuff around, and having to slow down in every way (obviously this was long before the era of rapid-fire "burst mode" on the digital cameras that we have today!). By the end of the course, I really hated to say goodbye to that field camera, as I'd finally grown to love it and I had learned so much by working through that seemingly tedious process every time I wanted to shoot something......
 

someoldguy

macrumors 68030
Aug 2, 2009
2,806
13,992
usa
So , in the late 1980's , with a pocketful of money that was burning a hole in said pocket , I got myself a new to me m6 . Unlike my earlier M , this one had a LIGHT METER !!! No more Sunny 16 !

m61024.jpg


Fast forward many years , I'm retired , and another new to me Leica ....

m91024.jpg


Around 1992 or thereabouts I got the lust for an autofocusing camera to replace a long suffering FM2n . The long suffering , but tolerant wife said 'Go out and buy the damn thing" . So I did , got it new , paid way too much , and used it until the end of the bad old days of film . Still works fine...

eos11024.jpg


That got replaced by a 5D2 , which was my daily driver until I got tired of hauling a brick on my shoulder and got my current M43 G9

5d21024.jpg
 

Strider64

macrumors 68000
Dec 1, 2015
1,511
13,531
Suburb of Detroit
The Sony A9 was my second Sony when I got back into photography and the Sony A1 had for about 3 to 4 months. I had a Sony A7 R3, but sold it and I had all the intentions of selling the Sony A9. However, I just can't seem to part with it as I really like that camera and really really like the Sony A1. For now I am keeping the A9, but might sell it down the road.


img-camera-001.jpg
 

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
Put your 100-400mm GM on that A1 and she won't want to let go....these two, the camera body and the lens, just seem made for each other, with or without adding in a TC as well.

Well, actually, my A1 seems to love all the lenses I've put on her so far..... LOL!
 

Allyance

Contributor
Sep 29, 2017
2,074
7,662
East Bay, CA
My first camera, used all through high school. B&W polaroid reproduced much better than standard prints in the newspaper and yearbook. Film was expensive, my father never complained.
First camera.jpg

photo from internet site, camera is stored in my container, wasn't going to dig it out for this! I made myself a lens hood on my father's lathe out of aluminum.

First 35mm camera was a Miranda, good little camera. When I got to RIT I got a Bessler Topcon, nice but unknown. Then moved on to a Nikon.
IMG_1421.jpeg

IMG_1292.jpeg

When I went digital, I got a Olympus E-10. Because I like my Nikon SLRs, I got a CoolPix first, similar to yours "Clix Pix", paid like $900 for it. Hated so much I just gave it to my youngest son. It took forever to decide take a picture, kids got up and left the room before it would fire. Olympus has been a great camera, but iPhone is convenient. Had to make my own battery for the E-10, Olympus no longer makes one, cable coming out of battery goes to external power input, works great.
 
Last edited:

stillcrazyman

macrumors 603
Oct 10, 2014
5,649
65,006
Exile
I’ve only been in the photography world for about 10 years….
I started with a Sony a55 and a kit lens. I literally wore that little camera out. Then I moved on to the a77 and more ‘pro’ lenses.
E1D57C85-1D91-4E08-9A4C-2F5E6ECE7884.jpeg


After carrying that heavy camera around for a year or two…. Time for a change to small and light setup - Olympus EM5 Mk II and some nice lenses.

C31A300D-4309-4498-BA21-2C26FDD20FEE.jpeg


I did like the image quality of the m4/3 format and the lens combos - just one thing kept bothering me. Moving the focus point around was difficult for me without having the little stick on the back of the camera. So, research began on a new system….
Onto the Fuji XT3
43E14B72-04F7-485F-93C6-997D68485CD8.jpeg


I’ve been using this camera for a few years now and I find it really fits me and the style of photography I do.

4E6C7FBF-AA6A-4DF8-AF41-5A43927706DD.jpeg
 

Allyance

Contributor
Sep 29, 2017
2,074
7,662
East Bay, CA
Did a little research on my Besler Topcon Super D. It seems it had a good reputation at the time, solid camera.
"The Beseler Topcon Super D was the combat camera for the US Navy and the US Airforce from the 1960s to the 1980s after winning a competitive test with the Nikon F and several other Japanese and German cameras. It won for much stouter construction and better ergonomics. The US Army and US Marines went with Leica for silence. It fits to your hand like a perfect weapon, with the front-facing shutter button right under your right forefinger. Also, that huge, 5.8 cm f/1.4 lens is one of the sharpest ever honed and does not vignette, even when shot wide open."
Didn't know what I had at the time.
Topcon.jpg


Photo from the internet.
Edit: At the time Beseler was one of the largest enlarger manufactures, which added to Topcon's reputation.
 
Last edited:

dwig

macrumors 6502a
Jan 4, 2015
908
449
Key West FL
Did a little research on my Besler Topcon Super D. It seems it had a good reputation at the time, solid camera.
"The Beseler Topcon Super D was the combat camera for the US Navy and the US Airforce from the 1960s to the 1980s after winning a competitive test with the Nikon F and several other Japanese and German cameras. It won for much stouter construction and better ergonomics. The US Army and US Marines went with Leica for silence. It fits to your hand like a perfect weapon, with the front-facing shutter button right under your right forefinger. Also, that huge, 5.8 cm f/1.4 lens is one of the sharpest ever honed and does not vignette, even when shot wide open."
Didn't know what I had at the time.
View attachment 2024897
Photo from the internet.
Back during the heyday of the Topcon Super D, that is the early to mid 1960s, there were two solid SLR brands for real professionsals, Nikon and Topcon. Leica RFs were also, but their SLR ranked down a notch along with Canon and Pentax. As per the marketing common in the era, the American importer frequently added their name to the brank. Hence, in the US and Canada, Topcons were "Beseler Topcons" and Asahi Pentax models were "Honeywell Pentax".

Topcons were some of the best 35mm SLRs in that era. Their "win" with the US military was largely due to their interchangeable motor drives. The Nikon F could pretty much match the Topcon in brute force ruggedness, but the motors had to be custom turned to mate with a specific body. You couldn't mix and match bodies and motors the way you could with the Topcons.
 

Jumpthesnark

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Apr 24, 2022
1,242
5,146
California
Had to make my own battery for the E-10, Olympus no longer makes one, cable coming out of battery goes to external power input, works great.

Wow, did you ever give me a great idea, @Allyance! My second digital camera (after a small and really mediocre Nikon Coolpix 880 point & shoot) was the Panasonic DMC-LC1. This camera had but a 5MP sensor (not too bad in 2004 when it came out), but it was the product of a joint effort between Panasonic and Leica. Panasonic made most of the camera, and Leica made the lens, a gorgeous 28-90mm f/2 Vario-Summicron. That lens is an absolute jewel. Leica sold their own version (in a chrome body complete with a red dot, but otherwise basically identical) called the Digilux 2.

Problem is, I haven't used it in several years and when I took it out recently I found that none of the batteries can even hold a charge any more. And when I looked for a replacement battery, it was tough to find one. The only seller I found was a scammer, and I had to get PayPal to send me a refund after the guy didn't send me anything.

That said, I love your idea of adding a battery pack under the camera body. I'm going to try to make something like you did. Even though it would ruin the lines of this really nice looking camera.

220630-DMCLC1_001.jpg
 

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,424
48,308
Tanagra (not really)
The thing that makes M43 so much fun. E-M5iii, 25mm 1.8, 9-18, and the 75-300, all fits on a cooking scale and stays under 3lbs. Fantastic IBIS means 1s+ shutter speeds are snap (I've handheld up to 8s with some success), so you can even leave the tripod at home. Every format can have its trade-offs, but if you're looking to travel light and be adventurous, it's a great option. I've tried other brands and formats, including a venture into Fuji recently, but I just settle back in to M43 for the great portability and flexibility it offers. It's also pretty affordable for ILC, with a good range of excellent glass choices.
IMG_0580.jpeg

Recently I discovered quite the photographic irony. The first camera I ever owned was back in the 80s. I can't recall the brand, Vivitar perhaps, but it was a 110 format cartridge loader, which was a great no-fumble option for me as a kid. The irony? If you look up the dimensions of 110 format film, one frame is 13mm x17mm. What are the dimensions of the M43 sensor? 13mm x 17mm! Apparently I've been a M43 format user off-and-on for almost 40 years! :D
 

Allyance

Contributor
Sep 29, 2017
2,074
7,662
East Bay, CA
Wow, did you ever give me a great idea, @Allyance! My second digital camera (after a small and really mediocre Nikon Coolpix 880 point & shoot) was the Panasonic DMC-LC1. This camera had but a 5MP sensor (not too bad in 2004 when it came out), but it was the product of a joint effort between Panasonic and Leica. Panasonic made most of the camera, and Leica made the lens, a gorgeous 28-90mm f/2 Vario-Summicron. That lens is an absolute jewel. Leica sold their own version (in a chrome body complete with a red dot, but otherwise basically identical) called the Digilux 2.

Problem is, I haven't used it in several years and when I took it out recently I found that none of the batteries can even hold a charge any more. And when I looked for a replacement battery, it was tough to find one. The only seller I found was a scammer, and I had to get PayPal to send me a refund after the guy didn't send me anything.

That said, I love your idea of adding a battery pack under the camera body. I'm going to try to make something like you did. Even though it would ruin the lines of this really nice looking camera.

View attachment 2025062
I got the battery attachment when I got the camera, it had a slide out battery and a separate charger. The camera was in storage for a number of years and when I got it back, battery wouldn't hold charge. I tried to find a replacement, but Olympus stop making them years ago which meant any battery I could find would be too old, plus they were $150! Stock battery had multiple connections to the camera, so I had to use external power port on the side of the camera. Bought the batteries, holder and cable on Amazon, drilled a hole in the end of the battery slot and soldered cable to battery holder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark

BotchQue

macrumors 6502a
Dec 22, 2019
583
791
Agreed; fun thread!

My rough camera history:
- Kodak pocket Instamatic, ~1973
- Nikon N6006, 1991
- Nikon FM-2, 1992
- Nikon F-4s, ~1994?
- Nikon D-200, 2007
- Nikon Df, ?
- Nikon D-500, ?

Two are special to me. My FM-2:
FM-2.jpeg


...I just about wore it out, my first camera with a DoF preview, which changed everything for me. In those days AF was slower/less accurate than I was manually focusing, so this beast was fine. Still have it, although I'm not going to pay for film developing anymore, even if I could find it (have a half-brick of film still stashed in my freezer, need to get rid of that).
When DSLRs hit the market, what I really wanted was a digital FM-2: completely manual controls, no AF, no f*** screen, just like the FM-2 but with the possible addition of a spotmeter. Closest to the dream come true, Nikon released the mighty Df:

Df.jpeg


Although it was loaded with so many gew-gaws that I didn't want, it was essentially what I was hoping for; it even LOOKS like an FM-2! I read the reviews, and it was a very polarizing camera, and I waited until the barely-used copies started hitting the market, and got one (virtually untouched) for $1,900, not the ridiculous $2,750 they wanted for it, new. D-4 sensor, and Manual controls! Mine is set to Manual Exposure, back screen turned off, and I gots me a Spotmeter! Love this camera, and it works with all my old glass.

Nikon has since released the Z-fc (think that's right) and it is styled similarly but its taken me 35 or so years to get all the Nikkors I've wanted; in my 60's, I don't want to start over again buying newer Z glass. The Z-fc does have Eye Focus Control, and an adapter for "F" series glass; my D-500 does AF quicker than I do, now, so who knows? Right now, I'm good for this lifetime. :)
 

sparksd

macrumors G3
Jun 7, 2015
9,989
34,245
Seattle WA
Agreed; fun thread!

My rough camera history:
- Kodak pocket Instamatic, ~1973
- Nikon N6006, 1991
- Nikon FM-2, 1992
- Nikon F-4s, ~1994?
- Nikon D-200, 2007
- Nikon Df, ?
- Nikon D-500, ?

Two are special to me. My FM-2:
View attachment 2026653

...I just about wore it out, my first camera with a DoF preview, which changed everything for me. In those days AF was slower/less accurate than I was manually focusing, so this beast was fine. Still have it, although I'm not going to pay for film developing anymore, even if I could find it (have a half-brick of film still stashed in my freezer, need to get rid of that).
When DSLRs hit the market, what I really wanted was a digital FM-2: completely manual controls, no AF, no f*** screen, just like the FM-2 but with the possible addition of a spotmeter. Closest to the dream come true, Nikon released the mighty Df:

View attachment 2026657

Although it was loaded with so many gew-gaws that I didn't want, it was essentially what I was hoping for; it even LOOKS like an FM-2! I read the reviews, and it was a very polarizing camera, and I waited until the barely-used copies started hitting the market, and got one (virtually untouched) for $1,900, not the ridiculous $2,750 they wanted for it, new. D-4 sensor, and Manual controls! Mine is set to Manual Exposure, back screen turned off, and I gots me a Spotmeter! Love this camera, and it works with all my old glass.

Nikon has since released the Z-fc (think that's right) and it is styled similarly but its taken me 35 or so years to get all the Nikkors I've wanted; in my 60's, I don't want to start over again buying newer Z glass. The Z-fc does have Eye Focus Control, and an adapter for "F" series glass; my D-500 does AF quicker than I do, now, so who knows? Right now, I'm good for this lifetime. :)

I had an F2 Photomic. Wish I still had it as a keepsake!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BotchQue
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.