Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Gambet

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 22, 2014
12
1
Some advice will be really appreciated.

I'm going to buy the new 14 Macbook Pro M3Pro, and I'm deciding where to invest extra 200$. Do I invest them in a 1TB SSD, or it's better to invest in 12 core CPU and 18 core GPU??

Thanks for the help!!!
 

Gambet

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 22, 2014
12
1
Good answer 😆. My fault.

I will use it as a daily computer, including photo and video editing (drone video/photo, 360 cameras, some RAW photos…) but not professionally
No Gaming.
Not expecting to have my complete photo library on it, as it is much bigger than 1TB

Thanks!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burnincoco

Delarock

macrumors regular
Dec 25, 2016
183
89
I would go for 1 TB. I dont think you will gain much by buying more GPU, just few seconds during rendering time. I do basic stuff , sometimes some photo editing, and went back from M1 MAX 32 to mac mini M1 and during my workflow i cant see any difference (mac mini is 16 GB ram)
 

1BadManVan

macrumors 68040
Dec 20, 2009
3,285
3,446
Bc Canada
How much do you keep on your local drive vs the cloud or external drives? If you generally store the majority of your pics and video on something else external anyways, I would opt for the more powerful chip instead.
 

danwells

macrumors 6502a
Apr 4, 2015
783
617
Watch out for the 6 e-cores... The entry-level M3 Pro only has one more PERFORMANCE core than a base M3 You might get more speed out of a M2 Pro MBP with more performance cores. If you can get an upper-end M2 Pro for the price of an entry M3 Pro, you're getting eight P-cores instead of five (that will MORE than compensate for the per-core speed difference.
 

playtech1

macrumors 6502a
Oct 10, 2014
695
889
Ultimately it's down to the individual user's storage needs but I find there is a massive difference between 512GB and 1TB in practical terms - with 1TB I can probably carry my whole iTunes music library, a bunch of TV shoes, plus a local mirror of my cloud stored work files of a reasonable size, plus I can install all the apps I want (including a few games) and still have a decent chunk left over.

Extra CPU cores are nice of course, but won't be game-changing for any tasks, they would just in some cases make them complete a little (probably seconds) quicker. Whereas the time you will have to spend dealing with a full SSD can take hours if you regularly bump into capacity limits.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.