Originally posted by e-coli
HATE it. Absolutely positively HATE it.
How original, a "swoosh" inside the Apple.
How generic and late '90s can you get?![]()
Originally posted by dswoodley
The swoosh is suppose to provide a 3-D effect - tough to tell until you see it full size in good lighting. I think it's awesome, much better than the "X"
Originally posted by alset
I like it. I think it's a much cleaner design than the Aqua apple. I understand this also replaced the grey apple on boot.
Dan
Originally posted by cr2sh
I think (?) he was joking... when you look at the silver apple logo on one of the new displays it looks like that. Who knows...
Originally posted by e-coli
Unfortunately, I wasn't kidding.
Maybe I just need to see it full resolution, but to me this whole"swooshing" business has got to stop.
Here's a perfect example of a design / marketing nightmare. The the ditching of Paul Rand's logo for the awful thing below.
At least it has a "swoosh"![]()
Originally posted by cr2sh
Is it even possible to run osX on a 400mhz g3 with 192 mb of ram?![]()
Originally posted by e-coli
Unfortunately, I wasn't kidding.
Maybe I just need to see it full resolution, but to me this whole"swooshing" business has got to stop.
Here's a perfect example of a design / marketing nightmare. The the ditching of Paul Rand's logo for the awful thing below.
At least it has a "swoosh"![]()
One of? Stop fudging, Powerbook G5. Either you think X is the coolest letter of the alphabet or you don't. If we Californians can pick one governor from 135 candidates, surely you can pick one letter out of 26.Originally posted by Powerbook G5
I think that X is one of the coolest letters of the alphabet.
Who should pay royalties to who? *looks at Doctor Q's avatar.Originally posted by Doctor Q
X ain't bad, but in my opinion Q is the coolest letter. Apple simply didn't want to have to pay me royalties for using it.