Apparently, my Dad found out that the new imac and leopard is delayed till October at the least. It's caused by the rushing of trying to get the iphone out. I'll try and find a link to it because im sure alot of people dont believe me.
just because leopard is delayed doesn't mean new imacs are, too. apple doesn't hold back hardware releases because the software isn't ready.
but what if the new iMacs will require Leopard?
but what if the new iMacs will require Leopard?
are you expecting touch screen or some other magic?
How would they? What kind of hardware could they possibly have that would not work without an entirely new operating system? A multitouch screen?
Just wondering, where did all this talk of touch-screen Macs come from? I've seen some of the topics but they're huuuuuuuuuuuuuuge. I'm not entirely sure how practical a touch screen would be on a big iMac in the first place and how many people would use it?
This is what I've been saying as well. It's not like a mouse interface for desktop computing is a terrible thing. I think a touchscreen would annoy the daylights out of me, not to mention require me to shell out even more cash for something that is minimally useful. What would you do with a touchscreen iMac...reach across your desk to browse porn by hand? I wouldn't want to clean off fingerprints daily either. Yes, Mac would get a "woooooooo" factor if they introduced a touchscreen iMac. But unless they have an innovative reason to implement it, it would be wasted energy to design and wasted money to purchase for the vast majority of computer users.
Just wondering, where did all this talk of touch-screen Macs come from?