Some may argue wether the new iPod nano is a useful new gadget which combines all iPod or if it's redundant since:
Small -> iPod Shuffle
Capacity -> iPod Classic
Touchscreen -> Touch
Still it's a nice and risky new idea from Apple, but is it really worth to switch from an iPod Shuffle 2G user to the nano or just upgrade to the "new" Shuffle.
iPod Shuffle
+ Cheap
+ can be used "blind"
+ Clip
+/- "only" 2GB, what's enough for a gadget without screen
- nothing really new -> Shuffle 2G (yes, it has polished alu)
- no display
- uses 3 pole jack for file transfer and charging (no playing while charging)
iPod Nano
+ something completely new
+ clip
+ touchscreen display
+ 8GB/16GB
+ still uses normal Apple connector rather than audio jack like shuffle
+/- just like a shuffle but with a touchscreen display
- no video playback
- no camera (who used it anyway on the nano)
- expensive for just a shuffle + touchscreen
What do you think guys?
Small -> iPod Shuffle
Capacity -> iPod Classic
Touchscreen -> Touch
Still it's a nice and risky new idea from Apple, but is it really worth to switch from an iPod Shuffle 2G user to the nano or just upgrade to the "new" Shuffle.
iPod Shuffle
+ Cheap
+ can be used "blind"
+ Clip
+/- "only" 2GB, what's enough for a gadget without screen
- nothing really new -> Shuffle 2G (yes, it has polished alu)
- no display
- uses 3 pole jack for file transfer and charging (no playing while charging)
iPod Nano
+ something completely new
+ clip
+ touchscreen display
+ 8GB/16GB
+ still uses normal Apple connector rather than audio jack like shuffle
+/- just like a shuffle but with a touchscreen display
- no video playback
- no camera (who used it anyway on the nano)
- expensive for just a shuffle + touchscreen
What do you think guys?